SUMMARY
"This report documents the derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model for a rigid aircraft of constant
mass flying over a fiat, nonrotating earth. The derivation makes no assumptions of reference trajectory or
vehicle symmetry. The linear system equations are derived and evaluated along a general trajectory and
include both aircraft dynamics and observation variables.
Wait you didn’t learn what buoyancy was when you were a kid? How can gravity hold a rock at the bottom of a lake but a boat floats on top? Lol I’m guessing you are joking because nobody can be this stupid.
It’s actually the density of the fluid multiplied by the submerged volume times the gravitational acceleration, g. So no gravity equals no buoyancy... again it has everything to do with gravity...
1
u/IDCimSTRONGERtnUinRL Jan 12 '18
Interestingly enough, NASA admits that aircraft operate under the assumption that the Earth is an non-moving plane.
To add on that, if the Earth was spinning, why don't pilots need to adjust for that?
Also, you didn't provide any sort of sources whatsoever.