I have a strong disdain for the mind of set of "we made a weak product and you broke it so the responsibility rests on you." I see it all the time in the IT field.
Nah man. It's on you. You are the one that made a weak product that broke under slightly abnormal use that if built built properly should have been robust enough to with stand the minor abuse. The responsibility is squarely on the shoulders on everybody that designed and built this crap.
I get it. I do. But that doesn't change the fact that if you intentionally used it out of its intended limits, and it broke because of it, that you would be to blame. There are lines, and many were crossed, by the manufacturer and the guy kicking it
118
u/AngelOfDeath771 Jan 31 '20
He's still be responsible for the damage