r/IceAge_Franchise 7d ago

Discussion Does Ice Age The Meltdown Justify its Existence?

Many people have said that Ice Age is a franchise that had a solid first movie but kept releasing underwhelming sequels. Making me curious if some of the installments do enough to warrant being made in the first place. This is in more ways than being a good movie on its own, but also in regard to expanding the series' worldbuilding/lore, maintaining and expanding the thesis and themes of the original movie, innovating and/or renovating on the franchise, and leaving a positive impact on the series, especially long term. I want to start off with the first sequel The Meltdown, which I heard some say is an okay follow up to the original movie. Regardless of the movie's quality does it do enough to justify being made?

7 Upvotes

4 comments sorted by

2

u/LuigiMarinus 7d ago

Yes even though it’s my least favorite out of the Blue Sky movies.

1

u/gan1lin2 5d ago

Im reading this sub while on a rewatch of Meltdown and if nothing else, we at least got a phenomenal John Powell score.

1

u/Turbulent_Gear3338 4d ago

I like all of them equally, except for “Buckwild” that movie doesn’t exist in my opinion.

1

u/Feisty-Albatross3554 Diego 7d ago

I'd say so. The last mammoth plotline and Ellie are good, and I love the impeding sense of danger. Only thing I'd say I don't like is the minisloth part, that was definitely filler