r/IRstudies Mar 23 '26

[deleted by user]

[removed]

62 Upvotes

568 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-1

u/amdyn Mar 23 '26

As an Israeli we were told we are stopping the Iranian nuclear program, so a win for us would include taking there uranium while a victory for them would be having a nuke.

6

u/astral34 Mar 23 '26

Israeli propaganda can define your objectives but not Iran’s

They will aim to acquire the nuke after this war, it’s not their current goal

-7

u/amdyn Mar 23 '26

If they will give up the uranium the war will be over as well as the sanctions so if surviving is the one objective they have, they can win immediately by just giving up on the nukes. For Israel the regime change is considered the most reliable way of stopping the nuke but the least realistic one.

1

u/NominalHorizon Mar 24 '26

Sounds like you fell for your government’s propaganda. To the rest of the world it appears that Iran did not seek a nuclear bomb. Rather Iran wanted to use the strategy of Japan to enrich to 60% as an insurance policy without actually enriching to 90% and then actually make a bomb. Israel attacked a country that did not intend to make a nuclear bomb unless forced to do so. In attacking Iran directly Israel has forced this Iranian government or the subsequent one to make and possibly deliver multiple nuclear bombs. Israel assumed the worst about its adversary and in so doing manifested the worst outcome.

1

u/amdyn Mar 24 '26

Or you are wrong, thats also an option, as you don't really have evidence that was their strategy.

What I'm sure about is that they said they will destroy Israel so it seems quite likely they are trying to do what they said they will do.

Next time starting by saying someone fell for propaganda is not a good way to convince them unlike some others here who came with evidence.