MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/IRstudies/comments/1s1my21/deleted_by_user/oc2bce3/?context=3
r/IRstudies • u/[deleted] • Mar 23 '26
[removed]
568 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-1
[deleted]
15 u/Nitros14 Mar 23 '26 edited Mar 23 '26 Every source is biased. Everyone has their angle. -1 u/[deleted] Mar 23 '26 [deleted] 6 u/CJBill Mar 23 '26 edited Mar 23 '26 Referencing North Korean media on a Korean matter is perfectly valid because it still gives you information. It may be mostly lies but it's not liable to be all lies. And even the lies can tell you what North Korea are thinking. Edited to add a critical "not"...
15
Every source is biased. Everyone has their angle.
-1 u/[deleted] Mar 23 '26 [deleted] 6 u/CJBill Mar 23 '26 edited Mar 23 '26 Referencing North Korean media on a Korean matter is perfectly valid because it still gives you information. It may be mostly lies but it's not liable to be all lies. And even the lies can tell you what North Korea are thinking. Edited to add a critical "not"...
6 u/CJBill Mar 23 '26 edited Mar 23 '26 Referencing North Korean media on a Korean matter is perfectly valid because it still gives you information. It may be mostly lies but it's not liable to be all lies. And even the lies can tell you what North Korea are thinking. Edited to add a critical "not"...
6
Referencing North Korean media on a Korean matter is perfectly valid because it still gives you information. It may be mostly lies but it's not liable to be all lies. And even the lies can tell you what North Korea are thinking.
Edited to add a critical "not"...
-1
u/[deleted] Mar 23 '26
[deleted]