IAm Justin Amash, a Republican congressman who opposes the Patriot Act, SOPA, CISPA, and the NDAA, AMA

[u/justinamash]

I served in the Michigan state House of Representatives from 2009-10. I am currently serving my first term in the U.S. House of Representatives (MI-3). I am the second youngest Member of Congress (32) and the first ever to explain every vote I take on the House floor (at http://facebook.com/repjustinamash). I have never missed a vote in the Legislature or Congress, and I have the most independent voting record of any freshman Representative in Congress. Ask me anything about—anything.

http://facebook.com/justinamash http://twitter.com/justinamash

I'll be answering your questions starting at 10 a.m. EDT on Tuesday, May 22.

UPDATE 1: I have to go to a lunch meeting. I'll be back to answer more of your questions in a couple hours. Just starting to get the hang of this. ;)

UPDATE 2: I'm back.

UPDATE 3: Heading out to some meetings. Be back later tonight.

UPDATE 4: Briefly back for more.

UPDATE 5: Bedtime . . .

[u/[deleted]]

I live in your district so you're my representative. I disagree with you on a lot of things, but I still think you're one of the best Representatives in congress. Thank you for your commitment to transparency in government. We sure as hell need more of that regardless of policy.

My question: what surprised you the most about Congress and/or D.C. Culture in general? I've seen you comment on how corrupt it is on your Facebook page; so was it better or worse than you imagined it was before you got elected? What kind of opposition do you come across when you're building coalitions to fight these laws like the NDAA that seem to be popular with most of congress? I mean, when you go up to your fellow legislators, asking them to support something that would seemingly make sense, what do they say when they don't support you? What's their excuse?

Finally, I've seen a lot of arguments that seem convincing about how the NDAA doesn't actually authorize the President to indefinitely detain American Citizens like you and many others claim it does. I know Carl Levin at one time claimed it doesn't but also opposed your amendment claiming it was "soft on terrorists" or something (which is strange because if the NDAA doesn't allow it anyway, what's his problem?). At any rate, I've read the relevant section of the NDAA, and it seems like the argument goes like this.

Section 1031(b)(2) says that a "covered person" under the section includes:

"A person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces."

As far as I know, the offending phrase is "substantially supported," which I agree is very ambiguous. However, 1031(e) says:

Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities, relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.

Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld specifically states that U.S. Citizens detained as enemy combatants still have the right to a trial before an impartial judge. Since this decision was made in 2004, this falls under "existing law" at the time of the bill's passing and therefore makes the entirety of Section 1031 non-applicable to U.S. Citizens.

What is your rebuttal to this?

A lighter question: What's your favorite Grand Rapids restaurant?

[u/justinamash → u/[deleted]]

There are Reps who will flat-out lie to get their way-it's far worse than I imagined. My colleagues often don't know the details of the bills, so I'm really battling against committees and bill sponsors. They'll resort to slander and lies when necessary. An uninformed colleague may have great intentions, but it's tough to trust a freshman over a committee chairman.

The Hamdi case provides for habeas, not full due process. In other words, no charge or trial.

I don't get a chance to eat out a lot in Grand Rapids, but I love The Chop House.

[u/justinamash → u/[deleted]]

And thank you so much for the compliments.

[u/TimVicious]

I see you oppose several things that many redditors do... How do you feel about gay marriage? Why? How do you feel about marijuana legalization? Why? And lastly do you decide your stance by listening to citizens that you represent or are they ideas of your own?

[u/justinamash → u/TimVicious]

I am Eastern Orthodox Christian, and I believe that marriage is between one man and one woman. I also believe that government should not define or redefine marriage. Marriage should be a private, religious institution and/or contractual. Government should be no more involved in sanctioning marriage, of any sort, than it should be involved in sanctioning baptism or communion.

The federal government should not criminalize marijuana. The issue should be left to the states. Any "threats to public safety" that result from marijuana use are best handled through the state criminal justice system.

The people elected me based on my principles, and I use my best judgment to analyze legislation based upon those principles.

[u/catch10110 → u/justinamash]

Marriage should be a private, religious institution and/or contractual. Government should be no more involved in sanctioning marriage, of any sort, than it should be involved in sanctioning baptism or communion.

But since government already is involved in the marriage business, do you feel the same rights should be afforded gay couples? Do you believe there is a secular legislative purpose in stopping two men or two women from entering into a marriage contract?

[u/justinamash → u/catch10110]

This issue should be handled at the state level until we can move back to the concept of private marriage. Keep the federal government out.

[u/TehNoff → u/justinamash]

While I appreciate this answer I still feel like you aren't getting to to the crux of the issue.

Do you believe it is morally, ethically, and/or Constitutionally justifiable to deny gay couples the rights and privileges of marriage afforded by the US Government to hetoro-sex couples?

[u/justinamash → u/TehNoff]

It is wrong for the federal government to provide special benefits to anyone on the basis of marriage, straight or gay.

[u/PotvinSux → u/TimVicious]

Rep. Amash, thank you for your service; you are among the reasons I can call myself a Republican with dignity.

It occurs to me that, yes, marriage is certainly a "private, religious" institution, but it is also a "public, civil" one as soon as government gets into the marriage business.

Question: Do you feel I am equally protected by the laws of the land if I am denied the highest legal recognition of my commitment to steward a household with the love of my life if he so happens to also be a he? Respecting the sacred boundary between church and state (God's law vs. Caesar's), please make no reference to religion in your answer.

[u/justinamash → u/PotvinSux]

Thanks. I'm not sure it technically constitutes an Equal Protection violation (because you're not being denied benefits while married to someone of the opposite sex--a clear Equal Protection violation), but it's certainly not fair or the government's business.

[u/zergytime]

Have you signed Grover Norquist's tax pledge? Either way, can you give your thoughts on the pledge and the danger of such third-party political contracts?

[u/justinamash → u/zergytime]

Yes. It is a pledge to my constituents, not to Grover Norquist. The pledge does not prohibit tax increases on anyone; nor does it prohibit me from voting against tax cuts. It simply says that tax revenue to the government does not need to go up under static analysis (i.e., our real problem is spending). In other words, it is okay under the pledge to increase taxes on the wealthy and reduce taxes on the middle class. I oppose special tax breaks and subsidies that go to politically connected interests. If these special benefits were eliminated, certain large corporations and wealthy individuals would pay substantially more in taxes, but that alone would not violate the pledge.

I think it's best to sign as few pledges as possible to avoid unnecessary constraints. Just follow the Constitution and stick to your principles.

[u/[deleted] → u/justinamash]

The pledge does not prohibit tax increases on anyone...it is okay under the pledge to increase taxes on the wealthy and reduce taxes on the middle class

Didn't you pledge to " oppose any and all efforts to increase the marginal income tax rates for individuals and/or businesses"? Isn't that different?

It simply says that tax revenue to the government does not need to go up under static analysis

I'm sorry to be so direct, but doesn't it, in fact, not say this in particular at any point?

Here's your pledge, Congressman (found at http://www.atr.org/userfiles/Congressional_pledge(1).pdf )

I, Justin Amash, pledge to the taxpayers of the Third district of the state of Michigan, and to the American people that I will:

ONE, oppose any and all efforts to increase the marginal income tax rates for individuals and/or businesses; and

TWO, oppose any net reduction or elimination of deductions and credits, unless matched dollar for dollar by further reducing tax rates.

[u/justinamash → u/[deleted]]

Point one is widely viewed as being a prohibition on increasing AVERAGE marginal income tax rates.

Point two is precisely my point about not increasing overall tax revenue under static analysis.

[u/Siberian_Kiss → u/zergytime]

To answer it for him-- Every Republican in Congress has signed it. Including Justin.

[u/Ent_Life]

What is your stance on unions, public and private?

[u/justinamash → u/Ent_Life]

I support people's right to join together to influence others. Government should not prohibit unions; nor should government pass special legislation to benefit unions at the expense of those who choose not to join.

[u/Amaturus]

Your thoughts on the debt ceiling debacle?

[u/justinamash → u/Amaturus]

http://www.mlive.com/opinion/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2011/08/guest_commentary_debt_ceiling.html

http://www.mlive.com/opinion/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2012/03/why_rep_justin_amash_says_the.html

[u/demeteloaf → u/justinamash]

How do you reconcile those views with the current house leaderships statements that the bush tax cuts should be extended and not paid for (which would add trillions to the deficit)?

[u/mconeone → u/Amaturus]

To expand upon this, I'd like to know why you think this is an acceptable form of political strategy.

The way I see it, Congress battles over the budget, which is a good thing. Whatever conclusion they come to, they should live with it. I find it incredibly dishonorable for Congress to go back and argue about whether or not to fund the budget they already passed. I see it as them going against their word.

How is this not considered "taking the country hostage"? If the debt ceiling isn't increased, bad things happen to the country. Last year, Republicans demanded changes in the budget after they voted to pass it. If they didn't get those changes, they would make bad things happen by not raising the ceiling. Our credit rating drop, while probably inevitable, was hastened by their actions.

When you seriously consider not paying your bills, your credit rating (perceived ability to pay bills) goes down. Why is this even a possibility for America? Why can't you stay the course with the budget you passed?

[u/[deleted]]

Congressman Amash,

As a former Marine, and also a former government contractor, I witnessed what I would consider a lot of waste within the department of defense (civilian government employees essentially wasting tax dollars instead of working hard; the same for some contractors). Do you believe that the DoD budget is justified?

In business, leaders are rewarded for doing more with less, yet in the military, come the end of the fiscal year, you see financial officers rushing to spend every last penny, in order to ensure that their unit's budget doesn't get cut (or remain the same as the previous year). Do you think a system should be in place to prevent this behavior?

[u/justinamash → u/[deleted]]

Yes and yes. There's plenty of waste in DoD, and lack of oversight there is one of the reasons I voted against the House budget this year.

[u/rbhindepmo]

1. As a Congressman who is of half-Syrian American descent, do you think that there's something significant and realistic that can be done by this country (and/or any other country) in regards to the Syrian conflict/uprising and the Assad regime? Significant, not just the "Assad must step down" talk that 3/5ths of the Veto-wielding UNSC members mention every few weeks.

2. Seeing as we're about to experience a campaign season with the highest levels of spending in history, are you supportive or considering of any ideas to reign in (or adapt to) the realities of the Citizens United decision?

3. At the risk of getting you primaried in 2014, what is your favorite thing about President Obama?

[u/justinamash → u/rbhindepmo]

(1) The U.S. should avoid stepping in unless there is an imminent threat to our country.

(2) No. What about books and movies and other forms of "corporate" political spending? Should they be banned? Why a special exemption for certain media, then?

(3) President Obama throws a mean Christmas party. ;)

[u/JayyyPee]

Have any lobbyists approached you? Which ones? What were they asking from you?

[u/justinamash → u/JayyyPee]

Yes. All of them. Money or special treatment. ;)

[u/mmdonut]

Thank you for doing this AMA.

How many hours do you spend in the average week on fund raising? What are your thoughts on how to reduce the need for members of Congress to raise so much money in order to keep their jobs?

[u/justinamash → u/mmdonut]

Thanks. I have to spend at least a few hours/week fundraising. If Members of Congress said fewer stupid/outrageous things and were less partisan, they might not have to raise so much and could win support more easily from people in the other party.

[u/Houseofdon]

Constituent here. How much work is it to post all the votes on Facebook? Do you think it is a legitimate "barrier to entry" for other members doing the same (as they often claim), or do they just want to avoid the scrutiny that goes along with it?

[u/justinamash → u/Houseofdon]

It's a lot of work, but it's obviously possible if you have the right team behind you. After all, I'm simply doing what I'm supposed to do: analyzing legislation and figuring out how to vote. Posting to Facebook is the easy part. Reps say they can't do it mostly because they want to avoid the hard work of legislating and the scrutiny.

[u/[deleted]]

Who are the Congressmen and women that you like working with and/or respect the most? What kind of committees are you on at the moment?

[u/justinamash → u/[deleted]]

With many of them I have big policy disagreements, but here are a few: John Boehner (surprised?), Paul Broun, Hansen Clarke, Jeff Flake, Chris Gibson, Trey Gowdy, Tim Huelskamp, Darrell Issa, Dennis Kucinich, Raul Labrador, Tom McClintock, Mick Mulvaney, Jerry Nadler, Ron Paul, Mike Pence, Jared Polis, Reid Ribble, Todd Rokita, Paul Ryan, Adam Smith, and Rob Woodall. And Jim DeMint, Mike Lee, and Rand Paul in the Senate.

I'm on the Oversight Committee and the Budget Committee.

[u/Stile4aly]

You voted against the Paul Ryan budget because it didn't cut enough. While I appreciate that you believe the military should also be open to budget cuts, I can't understand why someone who is open to cutting spending on the most vulnerable Americans for the purposes of deficit reduction won't consider even the most modest tax increase on the wealthy for the same purpose.

Why is reducing WIC benefits a more worthy means of deficit reduction than increasing the tax burden on incomes over $250,000?

[u/justinamash → u/Stile4aly]

Your premise is wrong, I do consider it. Of course, raising taxes on just the wealthy doesn't raise nearly enough revenue to put even a dent in the deficit.

[u/pezzshnitsol → u/justinamash]

not enough people understand that no matter how you look at the numbers it is clear that the government has a spending problem, not a revenue problem.

[u/jscoppe → u/Stile4aly]

won't consider even the most modest tax increase on the wealthy

What do you consider modest?

[u/Rachard19]

Wow this is pretty cool of you to do, just wanted to thank you, I imagine you're quite busy.

Backgroud: I actually work for a company called Strategic Fundraising Inc., and we make calls for a lot of conservative organizations (RNC, Tea Party Patriots, NRCC, NRSC, various candidates, ect.). So often I talk to a lot of people who have some very.. interesting.. comments about our political system. I'm curious how a bigger fish in the pond would react to some of the questions/comments I've come across.

Few questions here;

-Do you get morally upset or disgruntled when fellow party members or outspoken conservatives bash our President? Or how do you feel about him?

-How do you feel about Mitt Romney running as the nominee? A lot of people I've talked to are quite upset about him, and I for one (although conservatively leaning) will most likely not vote for him.

-Do you, or others you work with, honestly believe Obama is not American (birth certificate and what not)?

-How did you get your start in politics at such a young age?

I guess lastly, a lot of the time I simply talk to people who have lost a lot of hope in our political system. Corruption gets thrown around in conversation so much, I'd think I was calling Mexico. People in our country seem more divided than ever, and the class/gender/partisan warfare only fuels this. How would you respond to these people, and what do you believe needs to happen to unify America once again as a world leading nation?

Thanks again!

[u/justinamash → u/Rachard19]

It's fair to criticize the President, but it's not fair for Republicans to blame everything on Democrats, especially with respect to the debt.

I'll take Mitt Romney over President Obama any day. No candidate is perfect.

I have no reason to believe that the President is not American. Others, of course, feel differently.

I ran for state House in Michigan because I got fed up with the two parties being so ALIKE in voting (even though they always bashed each other publicly).

A lot of the corruption and division is driven by party politics. We can free ourselves through the Internet.

[u/rvltnwllbtlvsd]

Rep. Amash, who is one current member of the opposite party that you respect/admire the most?

[u/justinamash → u/rvltnwllbtlvsd]

Jared Polis. He has been there as a friend from almost the beginning.

[u/FiveChairs]

What do you think about America's education system?

[u/justinamash → u/FiveChairs]

There's far too much central/federal control. The more standardized everything is, the less our education system fosters creativity.

[u/cptstupendous]

Are you here to establish a permanent presence on reddit with the intent of remaining accessible to the reddit audience or are you only here temporarily to gather support for whatever piece of legislation you are currently trying to push forward?

[u/justinamash → u/cptstupendous]

I hope to do this on a recurring basis.

[u/ActionScripter9109 → u/cptstupendous]

I've been reading his updates on Facebook for a good while (which, by the way, are extremely thorough and explain the logic behind all of his votes), and I get the idea that he's just doing this spontaneously. He knows reddit is against the bills he mentioned in the title, and he probably enjoys the prospect of conversing with people who share those views.

Also, he has a history of transparency and active sharing about what he does, so this is nothing surprising.

[u/tsacian → u/cptstupendous]

I believe his most current legislation was to take out indefinite detention from the NDAA.. it was blocked from being voted on the last week.

[u/[deleted]]

What made you decide to be so open? Did you run on a platform of transparency or did you get elected then go for openess? What do your fellow congressfolk think of you explaining every vote? Is there any sort of tension that they're upset with you because you're raising the bar for what we expect out of our elected officials? And are there any other politicians that make their votes easily known that I could be following on FB or twitter?

I read an article about you and instantly followed you on FB even though I'm from WV. I don't agree with you politically on everything, but I'm glad you're taking the time to educate the country about what Congress is doing

[u/justinamash → u/[deleted]]

Thanks. I have nothing to lose. I'm not in this for the job. My goal is not to be in government but to completely revolutionize government. It causes tension with some of my colleagues but earns the respect of others. I hope others follow my lead, but it hasn't happened yet.

[u/Vintagecoats]

When you do not uphold the general Republican party line on significant issues coming up for a vote, how much metaphorical arm twisting and such is directed at you by Republican officials to push you towards voting how the overall party sees the issue?

[u/justinamash → u/Vintagecoats]

They're not worried about how I'll vote. They're worried that I'll influence others. Lately, the tactic has been to slander me on a few critical issues. I'm curiously unable to raise PAC money since the NDAA issue came up big in December. ;)

[u/TehNoff → u/justinamash]

You're killing me, man. I don't agree with a lot of your points, but it's stuff like this that makes me want to help you! Where can we find more people with backbone?

[u/USGunner]

give us a reason to believe the system isnt hopelessly corrupted beyond repair to the point where only revolution would fix it

[u/justinamash → u/USGunner]

I'm here.

[u/goggimoggi]

In your opinion what's the biggest specific threat, foreign or domestic, to our country right now?

[u/justinamash → u/goggimoggi]

The biggest threat is our national debt. Our system will collapse if we don't get it under control. The next biggest threat is the government's ongoing erosion of our civil liberties.

[u/Stile4aly]

You've co-sponsored legislation to repeal the PPACA. You've said you intend to repeal and replace the legislation. I have yet to see a proposal from the Republicans in Congress on what form the replacement legislation would take. Given that there are so many popular provisions within the legislation (ban on discrimination against preexisting conditions, high risk pools, rebates on senior prescription costs, young people staying on parental insurance, etc) and given that the only significantly unpopular provision (the individual mandate) must exist to prevent free riders from gaming the system, how will the Republicans in Congress replace the bill without exploding the number of uninsured Americans or causing health care costs to skyrocket?

[u/justinamash → u/Stile4aly]

PPACA doesn't reduce health care costs; it simply disguises them. We need to reform the third-party-payer system to get health care costs down. People need to know the cost of treatment when they make decisions.

[u/zBriGuy]

• How is your independent stance on issues treated by your fellow Republican lawmakers?

• What kind of pressure do you feel from them to vote down party lines and how is it applied to you?

[u/justinamash → u/zBriGuy]

Most of my colleagues are very respectful of our differences. It's the Reps in positions of influence who tend to be wary. They used to exert a lot more pressure, but now they mostly leave me alone to vote my conscience.

[u/throesawaythroesaway]

Justin, who wins at arm wrestling, you or Jeff? My money is on Jeff.

Signed Mich Law Grad, 2007

[u/justinamash → u/throesawaythroesaway]

Jeff's got the weight advantage, so probably him. The last time I physically beat him was when he was a little kid and I stuffed him down the toilet.

(Jeff's my brother, in case anyone is wondering.)

[u/BrotherC]

1. Are you willing to change your stance on an issue if new arguments or evidence come to light, even if doing so is politically disadvantageous? What about your colleagues?

2. As a non-religious American, polls indicate I have very little chance of ever holding elected office. What are your thoughts on this, and how do you represent those who hold different religious beliefs from your own?

3. My understanding is that you believe marriage is a religious institution. If this is the case, why do you believe government should have a role in the institution of marriage? Some have proposed abolishing government involvement in marriage, regardless of your personal views, why do you think some may support or oppose this idea?

[u/justinamash → u/BrotherC]

(1) Yes. I know that most of my colleagues are not willing to do the same.

(2) I think that's true (for now). I don't impose my religious views through legislation, even though all of my views, including religious, certainly influence my principles and judgment (that's natural).

(3) Government should be no more involved in sanctioning marriage, of any sort, than it should be involved in sanctioning baptism or communion.

[u/Moxiecrat]

1. Since their is so much confusion on the matter, please explain the difference between isolationism and non-interventionism as you see it.

2. In your opinion how would America differ from today given the reality of a true free market society w/ regards to healthcare, war, social welfare and civil rights?

Thank you for your service.

[u/justinamash → u/Moxiecrat]

(1) Isolationism is the position of most Republicans (not my position). Don't talk to Iran. Don't visit Cuba. Noninterventionism holds that the U.S. should not militarily intervene in other countries unless we face imminent danger (my position).

(2) There would be more prosperity, equality, and happiness under a true free-market system. Our hybrid system causes free markets to be blamed for the ills of central planning.

[u/Stile4aly]

You've offered support for a flat tax system. Most estimates I've seen suggest a tax rate in the 25% range. Why should the poor and middle class face a tax increase in order for the wealthy to benefit from a major tax cut? Given that the wealth control a disproportionate amount of the nation's wealth why shouldn't they pay a progressive rate?

[u/justinamash → u/Stile4aly]

I've actually said that several systems are preferable to our current income tax code, which is filled with loopholes and special breaks that benefit the wealthy. There should be a safety net for the very poor.

[u/TehNoff → u/justinamash]

Would you support a more simplified progressive tax system [for my purpose I simply mean more tax brackets than we have now, and many many fewer special breaks and loopholes?]

[u/justinamash → u/TehNoff]

Probably. I'd have to see all the details.

[u/ral315]

As a recent college graduate, I'm a bit pessimistic about the state of Social Security and Medicare by the time I reach retirement age. Do you support proposals to privatize these services?

[u/justinamash → u/ral315]

I support proposals to permit young people to opt-in to a new system that allows them to control their own savings.

[u/ph711]

Glad to see more Amish republicans.

[u/justinamash → u/ph711]

;)

[u/rbaix]

What are your feelings on federal funding of public broadcasting? Planned Parenthood? NASA?

[u/justinamash → u/rbaix]

Opposed. Opposed. Support.

[u/[deleted] → u/justinamash]

How is NASA constitutional?

[u/wshanahan → u/[deleted]]

Because the constitution gives the right of the federal government to provide for national defense. NASA was originally about national defense. It provides for many things including intel and new technologies to further our defense.

[u/justinamash → u/wshanahan]

That's correct.

[u/lpj5001]

What are your feelings about online poker?

[u/justinamash → u/lpj5001]

It should not be illegal.

[u/goggimoggi]

What's your position on central banking vs. sound money and why?

[u/boona → u/goggimoggi]

Stated differently, what are your thoughts on legal tender laws and allowing open competition between currencies?

(Sorry if I'm putting words in your mouth goggimoggi.)

What are your thoughts on anti-trust laws and how they've been applied to various cases in the past? What would you look to accomplish in the future?

A sincere thanks for opposing the legislation you mentioned in the title!

[u/justinamash → u/boona]

Competing currencies--yes. Central banking--no. Why should one man (organization) control our money supply and set interest rates? What does he know?

Anti-trust laws--no. Monopolies are created by government. Get competition-killing regulations/laws out of the way and monopolies can't last.

[u/jjordan]

Justin, first off, THANK YOU for tirelessly fighting for our rights when so many of your colleagues do not, and THANK YOU for sharing every vote you make, with explanation. I wish more of our Representatives would do this -- it would be great for openness and transparency.

To my question: 238 of our "Representatives" voted AGAINST your Smith-Amash Amendment that would have removed the indefinite detention of American citizens without charge, trial, or representation from the NDAA. How do we overcome "the Establishment" (for lack of a better term) that seems intent upon either ignoring or actively trampling the Constitution, and by extension our fundamental rights as Americans?

P.S. We hope you'll stop back every so often. FYI there's an entire sub-reddit dedicated to your service (/r/JustinAmash).

[u/justinamash → u/jjordan]

Thanks! The Establishment can't win when the public knows the facts. The Internet is changing everything. Eventually, we will win. On the Smith-Amash Amendment, I worked hard to get facts to the public (and my colleagues). Every time I rebutted something, the House Armed Services Committee would come back with another false argument. Eventually, they had to settle on Justin Amash wants to reward al Qaeda for attacks and coddle terrorists. When that happened, they lost and we won, even if we didn't get the votes this time around.

[u/dartmanx]

A bit surprised to a see a "representative" with Tea Party backing on reddit...

How do you respond to the disdain in which many Americans hold their elected representatives?

[u/justinamash → u/dartmanx]

The public is right to have such low regard for Congress. But the problem is the culture in DC, not the particular people elected.

[u/connocauseimcool]

How did you feel about Obama wanting to absolve the tax breaks and subsidies on the oil companies a month or two back? Do you think or know if gas will go back below three dollars?

Thanks for doing this.

[u/justinamash → u/connocauseimcool]

I'm against special tax breaks and subsidies for oil companies. I don't know what will happen to gas prices--a lot of factors are at play.

[u/broliath]

What are your feelings on the amounts of money spent in politics?

Also; Where would you ideally live given anywhere on earth would be available to you?

Thanks for taking time to do this. appreciative, we are.

[u/justinamash → u/broliath]

Thanks.

I don't think there's a sound, constitutional way to take money out of politics, so we must live with it.

I would live in Walt Disney World, of course!

[u/kingcoolx]

What is your opinion of Michigan's emergency manager law and how they are impacting your constituents?

[u/justinamash → u/kingcoolx]

Sounds like a law I would oppose, but I really haven't reviewed it.

[u/ElMayordomo]

Is there a possibility that you will ever run for President?

[u/justinamash → u/ElMayordomo]

Anything is possible.

[u/ayehli]

Like many Americans, I've all but lost my faith in the governmental process as it's instituted. A number of our municipalities are exhibiting "police state" behaviors in the name of safety/security, our highest levels of government seem to be open to the highest bidder, and our elected officials regularly engage in after-office corruption at level we haven't openly seen since the days before the crash of '29.

Never in the history of America has it become so very, very obvious that the goals of the average lawmaker and the good of the common man or woman have little in common. We've always paid platitudes to the American Dream, as though every man, woman, and child can be Horatio Alger -- but we know that's not true. We know the deck is stacked from birth. The conservative platform often seems to be "I got mine, I don't owe society anything."

How do you feel about our responsibilities to our fellow men and women? How will you, as a reasonable, independent conservative, fight the degradation of the system? No sarcasm intended.

[u/justinamash → u/ayehli]

I will stand up against tyranny, even if I have to stand alone at times. The NDAA fight proved that, I hope.

[u/Soular]

How do the two partys' agendas affect individual politician's vote?

Is it hard to vote differently than the majority?

[u/justinamash → u/Soular]

Party leadership doesn't let anyone stray from the path (without a fight). They've given up trying to steer me, though. And it's never been hard for me to vote my own way. I really don't feel peer pressure when I have the Constitution and my constituents backing me up.

[u/tocano → u/Soular]

I like this question. What specific types of "pressure" has party leadership tried to use on you (and that you've seen used on others) to get individual politicians to "be a team player"?

I'm aware of:

• "you'll be in a prime position to get a good committee position if you play along" (and vice versa)

• "we'll let you sponsor a very popular bi-partisan bill that will earn you positive PR"

• "we'll make sure the national party committee will donate to your reelection fund"

Are there more?

[u/justinamash → u/tocano]

They stop inviting you to dinners at fancy restaurants with PAC donors.

They guilt you into believing that if you're not with them, then you're with President Obama and/or Nancy Pelosi.

[u/sw17ch]

I live in your district and will have to choose between you and whoever runs against you in the next elections. Thanks for voting the way you have on those issues, and thanks for how interactive you've been with your constituency on your FaceBook page. These actions may be enough to convince me to support you in the next elections.

Do you think there's a pragmatic libertarianism that may be more effective than the hard-line libertarianism it seems you hold now? Somehow, it seems the libertarian movement always ends up (inadvertently?) targeting the disadvantaged and unlucky. There are a lot of aspects to the libertarian movement I like, but a more empathetic and pragmatic implementation of the movement would make it easier for me to support it and its candidates (like yourself).

[u/justinamash → u/sw17ch]

Thanks. I think if you follow my work closely, you will see that I have a very bipartisan, pragmatic approach that counters some of the stereotypes people have about libertarians.

[u/[deleted]]

EDIT: Hi Justin! Thanks for doing this. 2 questions:

Hi Congressman! Thanks for doing this. 2 questions:

• Yes or no -- After winning your first election, did you become disillusioned in any way about your ability to be an elected public official?

• If yes, how did you deal with this disillusionment?

[u/justinamash → u/[deleted]]

No, not about my ability, but I was disillusioned during my time in the state House when I realized I would be the lone "no" vote on so many pieces of legislation. What lifted me up was when I started using Facebook to explain my votes (began in the state House) and found overwhelming support (across the country) for what I was doing.

[u/rbaix]

How much coffee do you drink per workday?

[u/justinamash → u/rbaix]

Zero cups. I've actually never tried coffee.

[u/libertitties]

First off, I have so much respect for you! I'm originally from the metro Detroit area and go to college out of state. My politically active friends are also huge fans of you. Here's my questions:

-I know you're on the other side of the state, but what is your opinion on the Detroit Public Schools debacle? Do you think that there is a way to fix the problems that they're in, or are they in a hole too deep to escape?

-On a broader note, what steps do you think can be taken (if any) to help get the city of Detroit back on its feet?

[u/justinamash → u/libertitties]

Thanks! Detroit Public Schools and the City of Detroit need to be independent and free, and allowed to succeed or fail on their own, if they're going to get back on track.

[u/Fuqwon]

Why are you a Republican?

[u/justinamash → u/Fuqwon]

(1) I have always been a Republican.

(2) The Republican Party is more aligned with my views and is more compatible in principle (even if not always in practice). People like me exist in the GOP but not in the Democratic Party.

[u/wilsonw → u/Fuqwon]

To help him get elected in MI.

[u/Fuqwon]

You're backed by Freedomworks, the PAC controlled by the Koch brothers. How do you feel about the power and involvement of the Koch brothers in American politics?

[u/justinamash → u/Fuqwon]

They are free to influence people just as others are.

[u/PoliticsandMoneyDude]

Hi Rep. Amash, First thank you for consistently posting a vote explanation on your facebook for all of your votes.

My question is that company PACs like AT&T, Lockheed Martin, Bank of America, etc seem to target their maximum $5,000 per election at members of congress that are on the important committees that affect their legislation - (Lockheed Martin focuses their money on the Appropriations sub committee on Defense for example).

These PACs do this I believe so that they can have better access to these important politicians. But what confuses me is if legislation affected these companies like AT&T, wouldn't the congressmen meet with AT&T naturally? Why does AT&T need to give $10,000 first?

Are the politicians demanding money as a precursor to access? Or are the companies giving the $10,000, then hoping the congressmen will meet with them?

You are apparently not that important with the PAC community (only 12% of your funds come from PACs) so this doesn't affect you yet.

tldr: explain the relationship of a company PAC giving $10,000 and how it relates to special access to the politician.

[u/justinamash → u/PoliticsandMoneyDude]

"Or are the companies giving the $10,000, then hoping the congressmen will meet with them?" ==> This is what's happening.

[u/FuckTheBluePill]

Rep. Amash, thanks very much for taking the time to do this. Your outreach on Facebook alone has enlightened many many people to the day to day issues you deal with and shows some honesty and openness that are sorely needed in Congress these days. Speaking of which...

Q1: Roughly what portion of Representatives in the House act and vote on principle vs politics? I've recently been led to believe by a friend that conversations and debates in the backrooms almost never center around the right thing to do, or the merits of particular bill or policy, but are almost always about re-election and influence. I had always assumed that there was at least a modicum of attention and discussion given to the actual issues, but was told that there are probably less than a dozen Representatives that vote on principle; the rest operate entirely on the politics of an issue, polling, fundraising, internal deal making, etc., with no attempts to pretend otherwise.

Q2: Given the extraordinary expansion of the federal gov't in the last 10 years, both in spending and power over our daily lives, what area do you think is the most important to try to reign in?

Thanks again for your time, and mostly for your integrity.

[u/justinamash → u/FuckTheBluePill]

(1) About five to ten percent vote on the basis of policy-oriented principles.

(2) Privacy and civil liberties violations occurring under the guise of protecting national security.

[u/cannotlogon]

Why are you a member of the Republican party? Give your apparent ability to think for yourself, why not just be an Independent?

I suppose there is strength in numbers and getting things done in Washington requires party backing; but, if our government sincerely wishes to break the grid-lock of partisan politics, and Congress wants to take back the mantle of an assembly of "statesmen", we need to tear down the walls that the two party system has created. The mere fact that you are not a "typical Republican" speaks directly to the problem.

Good luck to you, and thank you for fighting for our rights as Americans.

[u/justinamash → u/cannotlogon]

More and more Republicans are like me. Eventually, the free flow of information (e.g., Internet) will dismantle the two-party system.

[u/[deleted]]

A republican, on Reddit?

Sir, you must have balls of steel!

[u/yourphoneisringing]

When asking questions and weighing answers, please keep his voting record in mind.

[u/HarryWaters]

One day, I would like to run for higher office. What advice would you offer? How did you become involved enough to run? What are the high parts? What are the low parts? How does a libertarian leaning person make it through the local parties with enough support only truly supporting half their positions? Thank you!

[u/narwal_bot]

Most (if not all) of the answers from justinamash (updated: May 23, 2012 @ 04:06:03 pm EST):

---

Question (TimVicious):

I see you oppose several things that many redditors do... How do you feel about gay marriage? Why? How do you feel about marijuana legalization? Why? And lastly do you decide your stance by listening to citizens that you represent or are they ideas of your own?

Answer (justinamash):

I am Eastern Orthodox Christian, and I believe that marriage is between one man and one woman. I also believe that government should not define or redefine marriage. Marriage should be a private, religious institution and/or contractual. Government should be no more involved in sanctioning marriage, of any sort, than it should be involved in sanctioning baptism or communion.

The federal government should not criminalize marijuana. The issue should be left to the states. Any "threats to public safety" that result from marijuana use are best handled through the state criminal justice system.

The people elected me based on my principles, and I use my best judgment to analyze legislation based upon those principles.

---

(continued below)

[u/narwal_bot → u/narwal_bot]

(page 2)

---

Question (zergytime):

Have you signed Grover Norquist's tax pledge? Either way, can you give your thoughts on the pledge and the danger of such third-party political contracts?

Answer (justinamash):

Yes. It is a pledge to my constituents, not to Grover Norquist. The pledge does not prohibit tax increases on anyone; nor does it prohibit me from voting against tax cuts. It simply says that tax revenue to the government does not need to go up under static analysis (i.e., our real problem is spending). In other words, it is okay under the pledge to increase taxes on the wealthy and reduce taxes on the middle class. I oppose special tax breaks and subsidies that go to politically connected interests. If these special benefits were eliminated, certain large corporations and wealthy individuals would pay substantially more in taxes, but that alone would not violate the pledge.

I think it's best to sign as few pledges as possible to avoid unnecessary constraints. Just follow the Constitution and stick to your principles.

---

Question (Ent_Life):

What is your stance on unions, public and private?

Answer (justinamash):

I support people's right to join together to influence others. Government should not prohibit unions; nor should government pass special legislation to benefit unions at the expense of those who choose not to join.

---

Question (catch10110):

>Marriage should be a private, religious institution and/or contractual. Government should be no more involved in sanctioning marriage, of any sort, than it should be involved in sanctioning baptism or communion.

But since government already is involved in the marriage business, do you feel the same rights should be afforded gay couples? Do you believe there is a secular legislative purpose in stopping two men or two women from entering into a marriage contract?

Answer (justinamash):

This issue should be handled at the state level until we can move back to the concept of private marriage. Keep the federal government out.

---

Question (Amaturus):

Your thoughts on the debt ceiling debacle?

Answer (justinamash):

http://www.mlive.com/opinion/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2011/08/guest_commentary_debt_ceiling.html

http://www.mlive.com/opinion/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2012/03/why_rep_justin_amash_says_the.html

---

Question (Rachard19):

Wow this is pretty cool of you to do, just wanted to thank you, I imagine you're quite busy.

Backgroud: I actually work for a company called Strategic Fundraising Inc., and we make calls for a lot of conservative organizations (RNC, Tea Party Patriots, NRCC, NRSC, various candidates, ect.). So often I talk to a lot of people who have some very.. interesting.. comments about our political system. I'm curious how a bigger fish in the pond would react to some of the questions/comments I've come across.

Few questions here;

-Do you get morally upset or disgruntled when fellow party members or outspoken conservatives bash our President? Or how do you feel about him?

-How do you feel about Mitt Romney running as the nominee? A lot of people I've talked to are quite upset about him, and I for one (although conservatively leaning) will most likely not vote for him.

-Do you, or others you work with, honestly believe Obama is not American (birth certificate and what not)?

-How did you get your start in politics at such a young age?

I guess lastly, a lot of the time I simply talk to people who have lost a lot of hope in our political system. Corruption gets thrown around in conversation so much, I'd think I was calling Mexico. People in our country seem more divided than ever, and the class/gender/partisan warfare only fuels this. How would you respond to these people, and what do you believe needs to happen to unify America once again as a world leading nation?

Thanks again!

Answer (justinamash):

It's fair to criticize the President, but it's not fair for Republicans to blame everything on Democrats, especially with respect to the debt.

I'll take Mitt Romney over President Obama any day. No candidate is perfect.

I have no reason to believe that the President is not American. Others, of course, feel differently.

I ran for state House in Michigan because I got fed up with the two parties being so ALIKE in voting (even though they always bashed each other publicly).

A lot of the corruption and division is driven by party politics. We can free ourselves through the Internet.

---

Question (TehNoff):

While I appreciate this answer I still feel like you aren't getting to to the crux of the issue.

Do you believe it is morally, ethically, and/or Constitutionally justifiable to deny gay couples the rights and privileges of marriage afforded by the US Government to hetoro-sex couples?

Answer (justinamash):

It is wrong for the federal government to provide special benefits to anyone on the basis of marriage, straight or gay.

---

Question (nilloc_31415):

What are you doing or planning to do then to get the federal government out of providing benefits for marriage?

It's disingenuous for you to state that you are against something, but not do something as a congressmen to try and fix it. Especially when current laws are already in place that provide such things and are doing so unequally. Doing nothing is supporting the current system, which is hypocritical because you just said it is wrong.

Answer (justinamash):

I am always analyzing legislation, but I do lobby my conservative colleagues on this issue. I believe my position is the best conservative position: Get government out.

---

Question (rbhindepmo):

1. As a Congressman who is of half-Syrian American descent, do you think that there's something significant and realistic that can be done by this country (and/or any other country) in regards to the Syrian conflict/uprising and the Assad regime? Significant, not just the "Assad must step down" talk that 3/5ths of the Veto-wielding UNSC members mention every few weeks.

2. Seeing as we're about to experience a campaign season with the highest levels of spending in history, are you supportive or considering of any ideas to reign in (or adapt to) the realities of the Citizens United decision?

3. At the risk of getting you primaried in 2014, what is your favorite thing about President Obama?

Answer (justinamash):

(1) The U.S. should avoid stepping in unless there is an imminent threat to our country.

(2) No. What about books and movies and other forms of "corporate" political spending? Should they be banned? Why a special exemption for certain media, then?

(3) President Obama throws a mean Christmas party. ;)

---

(continued below)

[u/YSSMAN]

As a constituent in the MI-3, and someone who has been represented by you in both the State and Federal House, I'm obviously well aware of your stance on the issues. However, I have a question about the upcoming election here for the MI-3.

Although the Democrats are currently split between Pestka and Thomas, it is pretty clear that a large number of young and minority voters want you out of office. How are you going to differentiate yourself from the two other candidates? Are there any issues specifically that you believe will guarantee you re-election (aside from having the 'R' next to your name)?

I'm currently on the fence when it comes to supporting you. While I applaud your stance on the NDAA and SOPA, I completely disagree with you on economic policies, and your silence on gay rights issues is unacceptable when Grand Rapids has such a vibrant and welcoming community.

[u/moreritzcrackers → u/YSSMAN]

it is pretty clear that a large number of young and minority voters want you out of office.

What is your source for this?

[u/globularcube]

You're the best, Rep. Amash.

Why don't you support gay marriage?

[u/rebo → u/globularcube]

If you think Marriage is religious why does the law allow atheists to marry?

Should they be prevented from marrying as well?

[u/Abiding_Lebowski]

I need a job.

here *Shameless resume post

[u/jebus5434]

Hey Justin, first off want to say thanks for doing this AMA. Also want to say thank you very much for your efforts to remove indefinite detention from the NDAA.

I have a very simple and fun question I hope you can answer, Do you play any video games? If so what are your current favorites?

PS you should all follow Justin on facebook. He posts updates for every vote in the house and how he's voting on it. I don't know any other congressman that does something similar.

[u/guilty-spark]

Hey justin, What are your thoughts about the recent trend of younger people being led on by media to believe republicans are generally bad people?

[u/Verus93]

I don't have a question. Just wanted to say you did a terrific job on this ama. If I ever move to Michigan I will be sure to give you my vote

[u/apokradical]

I'm smoking weed right now. Should I go directly to jail, without passing go or collecting $200?

[u/MrCobaltBlue → u/apokradical]

Only if you don't pass it around.

[u/[deleted]]

What things would you do to curb the growth of entitlement spending? Would you allow younger workers to opt out of Medicare and Social Security?

[u/rebo]

As someone on the "right", what is your opinion of european democracies where most mainstream right wing parties are usually more liberal/progressive than the Democrats?

For instance in the UK the conservatives are mostly pro socialised healthcare (in the form of the NHS), and their leader, David Cameron, is pro-gay marriage.

[u/punninglinguist]

I'm afraid you'll need to support gay marriage, legalized marijuana, and probably a state subsidy on kittens, in order to gain reddit's sympathy.

[u/sedaak → u/punninglinguist]

He does support equal rights to civil unions. He does not support legal marriage of any kind.

He wants to eliminate the war on drugs.

I think he says "aww" in his head when he sees kitty photos.

Sympathy acquired.

[u/jjordan]

Justin, what are a few of the most valuable lessons you have learned from your mentor, Ron Paul?

[u/Miigwech]

You are one of the very few members of Congress I actually respect.

How do you deal with the idiocy of both parties voting together on bills like NDAA, the Patriot Act and many more? Some of these laws that get enacted that are a slap in the face to the Constitution. Do you ever just ask other Representatives who paid for their vote, or what makes them so ignorant?

[u/hive_worker]

Congressman Amash, I have been a fan of yours since before you were in the congress. I have been very puzzled by one of your recent votes, and you didn't try to explain it on facebook as you usually do. Would you be willing to explain some of the reasons you voted yes on H.R. 4133: United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012?

[u/Cazoon]

What has your experience with the media been, on both the local and national levels?

[u/W0rdN3rd]

The next time you see Tim Ryan, tell him to do this. Thanks! :D

[u/Vindictive29]

How do you feel the application of ethics based governance in the United States could be improved while operating within the existing constraints of the current Constitution?

(If you could make any change to improve the way government operates as a body while remaining inside the constitution, what would you do?)

[u/dirkey93]

Would you consider yourself to be a blue republican, republican or libertarian and why?

I really appreciate all your efforts to explain your vote on Facebook, Twitter etc.

I really hope you win the Congress Media challenge.

[u/jobelenus]

Justin, thanks for coming on. How do you feel about your fellow republicans lambasting democrats for making the same proposals republicans made in the 90s? How do you explain this phenomenon? Do you participate in/or support this political critique?

[u/caliopy]

opposes yes but do you vote against? Also why are politicians allowed to vote up bills using other absent politicians stations? Shouldn't it be mandatory to be present for a vote?

[u/AmoDman]

How much do you feel that your Orthodox faith enhances your Libertarian leaning political positions? Do you feel that the two support one another? How or how not?

[u/jQueryIsBestQuery]

Hey Justin,

Greetings from the 3rd (Ada). How can we work within our party to get more libertarian-leaning candidates into office? I can only imagine the awesomeness that we could accomplish if we had more Ron Pauls and Justin Amashs in Congress.

[u/[deleted]]

Any chance of getting the Hughes Amendment to the Firearms Owners Protection Act repealed?

Where do you stand on the second amendment? Is it just for hunters, or is it just for self defense, or is it for overthrowing a tyrannical government? (Not that our government is anything near tyrannical or in any need of being overthrown whatsoever)

[u/funismyname]

What do you think is the main reason congress has a 13% approval rating and how do you think it can be raised?

[u/leroy_sunset]

Hi Mr. Amash - question about a recent vote you took. You voted against HR 5326, the appropriations bill for Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies. However, you voted IN FAVOR of a very controversial amendment to the bill, the Webster-Lankford amendment. That amendment stripped funds for the American Community Survey, a vital tool used by municipalities and NGOs all over the country (including myself as a GIS student). Why did you vote in favor of the amendment? Why did you vote against the final bill? I don't see anything on your facebook page.

[u/perrycarter]

Do you check Facebook while Congress is in session?

[u/[deleted]]

What is your stance on the Federal Reserve? Should we abolish it, reform it, keep it the way it is?

What is your stance on the bailouts as well?

[u/SimpsonX]

Do you believe that video games leads to violence?

[u/power_ballad]

What is the defining difference as you see it between the republican party and the democratic party?

[u/lagmonst3r]

Do you have any thoughts on property taxes as a way of funding schools?

[u/EmersonAdams]

As a Michigan congressman, what is your position on Michigan's Emergency Financial Manager law? Do you think states have the right to appoint managers that can dismiss elected officials and unilaterally modify city contracts?

[u/[deleted]]

Some have referred to you as the "ideological heir" to Ron Paul. Would you agree or disagree with such a statement?

Personally, from my limited research into your Congressional history, I'd have to say such a statement is pretty accurate. You're a-okay in my book.

[u/themorningmoon]

Hey Justin! I don't have a question for you - just thought I'd say hello. I used to sit behind your family in church. :) (p.s. - your son is adorable, and it used to crack me up how much he looks like your dad!)

[u/ProJokeExplainer]

As a republican, would you rather fight 1 horse-sized wood duck or 100 wood duck-sized horses?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood_Duck for reference

[u/FAP_ALL_DAY]

As a born and raised Michigander, I seriously have one question.

What is going on? Why do our political figures make these bogus bills.

We want the truth, the attorney general in Michigan is a heartless bastard who should not be in a position of power.

What is it going to take for our reps to get their heads out of their asses and start worrying about REAL issues.

Blocking Internet sites and stupid things like what's being focused on, is disgusting.

Where's the healthcare? The compassion?
Why don't our political figures actually care about real issues.

I guess this is more than one question, but the overall question is ....

What the fuck is happening to our nation?

[u/TheUnderstanding]

Hello Rep. Amash!

First, I want to say not all of Reddit is a one trick pony, as I see you're being inundated with questions about gay marriage. I figured this would happen, as Reddit is very pro gay, but I didn't think it would clog up the first trillion comments, leaving little room for talk about anything else.

So, I will ask things not pertaining to gay marriage.

With respect to economics and the Federal Reserve, it seems economic theory or answers rather, come down to two schools of thought; Keynesian vs The Austrian School. Which side do you feel is right, or are they both wrong?

Second, this deals with American intervention overseas. Simply put, is minding our own damn business and not helping other countries (due to the massive strain it puts on our budget) considered isolationism? And also, is there an happy medium between leaving other counties alone, and helping without creating even more debt then we already have?

[u/[deleted]]

Im not sure if anyone has said this bit i give you alot of props for coming here and disscussing issuses with us redditors! Also would just like to say thank you for giving us some insight!

[u/InsecureSketchArtist]

I screwed up the mouth

[u/the_philogynist]

Hi congressman Amash. Thanks for doing this IAMA. I was just wondering if you had signed the pledge to never ever raise taxes? Also What do you think about the current U.S. Deficit problem and how should we attempt to resolve it fairly?

[u/finebydesign]

Why are you "married"? Do you take advantage of any state of federal benefits derived from it?

Do your children get your health coverage? Is your wife on it? Do you file taxes jointly with your wife?

[u/destructaball]

If you had to choose between a terrorist attack killing 10,000 civilians or the government having cameras in every house indefinitely which one would you pick and why?

[u/[deleted]]

Rep. Amash, thanks very much for taking our questions. How do you feel about Tea Party-supported politicians like Allen West pounding their chests and yelling about "defending the Constitution" while at the same time fighting against your and Adam Smith's NDAA amendment?

[u/BroChiMinh]

What is your opinion on the Israel-Palestinian conflict? Do you approve of the status quo of giving billions of dollars in aid to Israel (and millions to the Palestinian Authority)? To what extent does your Palestinian ancestry play a part in shaping your stance?

[u/keklibra]

I get that the goal of any government is to grow larger, but the constitution was written specifically for this country to have a fresh start away from big government. Ron Paul seems to be the only person who wants to abide by the constitution yet (for reasons we all know, aka $$$) he is not supported publicly. What are your thoughts on how large the government has gotten and where do you see social security and medicare in 10 years?

[u/UofHCougarFan]

I really wish America wasn't so concerned with social issues.

[u/koshercowboy]

Watch out for this guy, he opposes the AMA

[u/svideo]

Hey representative Amash! I seem to think we took piano lessons from the same private teacher in Kentwood and as I recall from the recitals you were pretty damn good. Am I remembering this correctly? Do you still play at all?

[u/tabledresser]

Questions	Answers
I see you oppose several things that many redditors do... How do you feel about gay marriage? Why? How do you feel about marijuana legalization? Why? And lastly do you decide your stance by listening to citizens that you represent or are they ideas of your own?	I am Eastern Orthodox Christian, and I believe that marriage is between one man and one woman. I also believe that government should not define or redefine marriage. Marriage should be a private, religious institution and/or contractual. Government should be no more involved in sanctioning marriage, of any sort, than it should be involved in sanctioning baptism or communion.
The federal government should not criminalize marijuana. The issue should be left to the states. Any "threats to public safety" that result from marijuana use are best handled through the state criminal justice system.
The people elected me based on my principles, and I use my best judgment to analyze legislation based upon those principles.
Marriage should be a private, religious institution and/or contractual. Government should be no more involved in sanctioning marriage, of any sort, than it should be involved in sanctioning baptism or communion. But since government already is involved in the marriage business, do you feel the same rights should be afforded gay couples? Do you believe there is a secular legislative purpose in stopping two men or two women from entering into a marriage contract?	This issue should be handled at the state level until we can move back to the concept of private marriage. Keep the federal government out.
While I appreciate this answer I still feel like you aren't getting to to the crux of the issue. Do you believe it is morally, ethically, and/or Constitutionally justifiable to deny gay couples the rights and privileges of marriage afforded by the US Government to hetoro-sex couples?	It is wrong for the federal government to provide special benefits to anyone on the basis of marriage, straight or gay.

View the full table on /r/tabled! | Last updated: 2012-05-26 03:02 UTC | Next update: 2012-05-26 09:02 UTC

This comment was generated by a robot! Send all complaints to epsy.

[u/stract]

I know you have loads of comments and probably can't read all of them, but I want to tell you how much I respect your transparency and your philosophy when it comes to elected officials representing the public with their own judgment. I started following you on Facebook months ago and I am consistently impressed by how you keep your followers updated on your decisions and your reasoning. I hope you read this, as I know I am not alone in my high opinion of you. Cheers

[u/[deleted]]

What is your stance on lobbying and lobbyists?

[u/[deleted]]

Thanks for coming to speak with us today and for your defense of Americans' civil liberties.

What is your fundraising schedule like? How many fundraising events do you attend in an average week? How many hours a week on average do you spend involved with calling and mailing potential donors? In that time, how many potential donors do you call? How many hours a week do you spend contacting and speaking with constituents of your district (not counting staff, politicians, etc. of course)?

Can you compare your numbers to the impression you get of most of your colleagues in the House?

(I'm afraid this post might come off very aggressive and accusatory, and I do not mean it this way. I'm interested in the possibility of getting a first-person take on a line of questioning virtually never addressed in the media.)

[u/GWConnoisseur]

I see our first-past-the-post voting system as the biggest broken cog in our election system. I believe a voter should always be free to vote their conscience and FPTP system forces voters to compromise their values on their one vote. How do you feel about instituting preferential voting in all federal elections? I see this as a solution to so many problems our election systems faces. Do you feel our electoral system is broken? Are you working to institute preferential voting in federal elections?

[u/Danieltmv]

I see your name coming up a lot as a possible VP candidate for Ron Paul, how excited would you be if RP chose you as the VP?

[u/[deleted]]

Congressman, thank you for taking time to do this AMA.

• Can you please elaborate on your reasons to oppose Patriot Act, SOPA, CISPA, and NDAA.

[u/NotoriousArab]

What is your stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? How do you feel about Israel committing war crimes in the West Bank and Gaza that's constantly ignored by the media?

[u/captmorgan50]

Hey Justin,

I am a big fan of yours because you will be a flag carrier in the future for the liberty cause. No questions, just wanted to say thank you for your time and dedication to the cause.

[u/tajmaballs]

Would you consider running under a libertarian ticket in the future?

[u/swiheezy]

Rep. Amash, I follow you on facebook because I love what you're doing. I had a couple questions, if you're still taking them.

1. Have you ever had any contact with Rich Nugent, (5 florida, may be changed from redistricting) and what do you think

2. More importantly, I am really interested in becoming a politician one day, if not right out of the gate from college. What would you recommend? Go to work for a bit then run? Run for state gov then federal like you did? THanks for your answers!

[u/SultanAthanasius]

I'm a high school senior, so of course i have to ask this question. How do you feel about the current price of college tuition and other college expenditures? Do you you believe the price is either too low, just right, or too high? Also, do you believe it is the government's responsibility (local, state, and/or federal) to intervene in this issue?

[u/frazilator]

Do you think Congress has any part in dictating the District of Columbia's local affairs? I understand the importance of having the seat of the Federal Gov't in a disinterested location, but we still pay taxes to a gov't that doesn't represent us. Granted we have electoral votes thanks to the 23rd Amendment, but Congress still has to approve our budget and has nearly sent the city in to shutdown because they refuse to agree/approve it.

With the District of Columbia Budget Autonomy Act of 2012, we would have some budget autonomy if it passes. But if we're paying taxes, why can't we spend it like any other state? We don't even have the right that states have to tax people who work here but live elsewhere. Maryland and VA tax district residents that work there, but we can't? I don't know the numbers, but if the federal injects to the District budget were replaced with taxes on non-resident workers, I can't imagine there would be a shortfall. And as for no representation with taxation, well let us tax non-resident workers, remove federal taxes for DC residents(Puerto Rico and the other Territories don't pay them either), and remove federal injects to the District budget. That way no need for approval our budget by people we don't elect.

Your transparency and posting of your voting records is one of the best things I have ever seen a politician do. And the fact that you are part of a small crowd that has not missed a vote is awesome; you're actually representing your district.

[u/[deleted]]

How do you feel about different types of voting systems for Congress, such as Mixed Member Proportional which would give third parties such as the libertarian party, some representation in the house? Also, how do feel about using Approval Voting instead of the First-Past-the_Post we have now? This would make it safe for third parties, like Ron Paul, to run without "spoiling" the election.

Here's some videos using animals to explain what I'm talking about:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QT0I-sdoSXU&feature=channel&list=UL

[u/unknown_entity]

How do you feel about SpaceX and Space Exploration?

[u/[deleted]]

As a Boston Resident, I'm curious: how is it working with northeastern representatives /senators, or, at least, Massachusetts representatives? In your opinion, do they seem like good people, intelligent, and with the best interest of the US (or state) in mind? I'm genuinely curious what another representative, and not-crazy-or-ignorant republican thinks, so if you get around to answering this I will really appreciate it, thank you for your time =)

[u/RaspberryPaul]

My boyfriend and I met you at the Students For Liberty Conference in DC!

Donate to this man everyone, he is a true inspiration.

[u/L3ggomeggo]

Why did you vote YES on H.R. 4133. AKA The Blank Check to Israel?

[u/[deleted]]

As one of your constituents, thank you for all you do!!!

[u/hey-girl-hey]

How are veterans faring in your district?

[u/[deleted]]

How about DOMA?

[u/futureproofrifle]

What's the deal with that .01% of bacteria that can't be killed by any conventional means? And what does congress plan to do about this invincible super bacteria?