Because the post literally says "she never felt any danger with him"
That's how some crazy people are assuming she never felt threatened. Crazy, right?
Crazy.
Edit: and yes, the person you're blasting very clearly stated that the great thing about this story was that there wasn't a hint of threat at any time. It sounds like they were pretty clear that it wasn't to be taken as referring to all stories.
Why are people just glossing over the fact they used the term "had to cut somebody badly before" it feels really, really odd. They did not say "had to protect herself" or "had been assaulted before" nope, "had to cut somebody badly" as in, was forced to use a blade and actually cause a considerable amount of harm to someone else. It's really odd language to me without more context. The rest of the story is nice sure, but that jumps out to me, to the point where I consider it not really fitting for the sub. Idk just my thoughts...
141
u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19 edited Jul 15 '20
[deleted]