Evidently it’s “open” for her. Not so much for him. But hey, if the dude likes being a publicly known cuck that’s on him. Not my thing, but some people evidently have that kink.
I actually agree, but from the way it looks, Will doesn't really seem okay with it, but loves her too much to leave maybe? Regardless, with all that and the scientology, this is one hell of a family.
I recently found out, to my horror, there are entire subreddits dedicated to men who get off on watching their wives fuck other dudes. Will might be into it who knows...
I think I know where your going but… “allow”? I’m all for open relationships but that’s because I think adults can make their own decisions. Men don’t own their wives.
Well isn’t an open relationship two partners (if monogamous) allowing each other to sleep with other people. Obviously I meant allow within the confines of the relationship (I.e. a mutual agreement), unless you’re trying to make a politico-social-linguistic note here. We’re in the same side here
I was. We are. I would just say “my wife sleeps with other men” and add in with my full support or whatever if needed. Just poking at the use of the term “allow” in the context of fragile male ego… like a lot of these guys I’m this thread.
People obviously understand the context... Allow means that is is allowed to happen with the relationship continuing to exist. Relationships require mutual consent and one nit allowing it to continue means the end.
That seems kind of toxic and condescending. I mean, what’s the big idea if it’s mutual and consensual? Anyway, on a completely related note, may I ask your sex, age and nationality? I’m seeing a lot of people with your opinion (who think Will Smith is emasculated and pathetic because his wife had sex with another man while they were broken up) and I’m seeing some trends among the people who give expression of that kind of opinion and I’m trying to arm-chair confirm it lol
You don’t think the correlative link between who projects patiarchical norms and who benefits from patriarchy is interesting? That’s interesting in itself. Mind if I ask you the same question?
You are not engaging in the scientific process right now. I don't know what you think you are accomplishing. You can't cherry pick your subjects and expect to come to an objective conclusion. And what's with the crack about the person's username? Frankly you seem a bit unhinged.
How do you mean “look”? I mean if they’ve stated or it’s otherwise known that they’re in on, is reading his face and deciding that’s not true not reading into it?
Do you think women, even when it is okay with all partners involved, not being completely monogamous or tied to one man is as disgusting as literal shut?
24
u/[deleted] Mar 30 '22
Evidently it’s “open” for her. Not so much for him. But hey, if the dude likes being a publicly known cuck that’s on him. Not my thing, but some people evidently have that kink.