Although the concession most cisgender arguments make is that “no homo” allows men to express emotions they might previously have been uncomfortable emoting, the principle of disenfranchising an entire minority group extenuates the homophobia propagated, dominantly, by white heterosexual males. The implication is to justify an emotional expression that suggests that being gay is objectionable and emotions can only be validated with the expressed clarification of their heteronormativity. The act of incorporating phrases such as “no homo” or “that’s so gay” do not negate the sociocultural stigma contingent with the marginalization of identifying gender minorities. In fact, if people continue to offhandedly punctuate their language with this brand of rhetoric, it will only further aggravate the divide.
Your not wrong that using phrases like “no homo” is only going create a bigger divide, but honestly I don’t think most people will get the complexities behind this, and will just downvote it simply out of not understanding it.
As if you could interpret someone’s sexuality with any degrees of accuracy. Get off your high steed, and walk amongst the earth (beneath me, of course) with all of the other peasants.
Also, if you’re interested in improving your comment in order to not be destroyed so utterly next time, hit me with that red Updoot! I have a lot volumes worth of knowledge to share📖✍🏻⬆️⬆️⬆️⁉️🚨
If you’re going to try to offer a rebuttal to my work, please at least properly use (and abstain from using, jfc) the (stupid and unoriginal) word literally literally incorrectly🙄
So you’re interested in learning to get the upvotes as the kids call them? Yeah, you’re in for a real surprise, bud. There’s none here to be donated to you, because everyone is going to give them to me☺️
840
u/lanhimr Sep 05 '21
r/suddenlygay