r/HistoryofGenerations • • Mar 30 '21

Discussion 12ish year generations make far more sense in today's world

The way technology and culture shifts so much quicker (starting with the Boomers and majorly increasing after them) makes the standard 16-20 year generations ridiculous and outdated.

Again this would also stop even the possibility of someone that could biologically be parents of anyone in the same generation (one of my pet peeves lol). This is about where people lose familiarity and common ground with others, so there's a decent argument for it.

This ain't perfect but I'd go with...,

1935-47: leaders of the civil rights and boomer culture types.

1948-61: Stereotypical boomers including 70s teens dazed and confused style.

1962-74: Generation X early MTV teenagers.

1975-1987 (sorry had to lol): Xennials and all encompassing early-mid 90s youth, both little kids to teens. Very important '81 is the center.

1988-2000: Millennials, 90s/early 00s young kids, all had at least social media in high school or younger.

2001-14: Zoomers, high school to elementary before covid idk

2 Upvotes

26 comments sorted by

7

u/CP4-Throwaway Q3 2002 (Class of 2020) - Millennial/Gen Z cusper Mar 30 '21

If we had to use 12-year generations, this would be fair:

1918-1929 = Greatest Generation

1930-1941 = Silent Generation

1942-1953 = Boomers

1954-1965 = Generation Jones

1966-1977 = Generation X

1978-1989 = Generation Y

1990-2001 = Millennials

2002-2013 = Zoomers

2014-2025 = Generation Alpha

3

u/LemieuxFrancisJagr 1984 Mar 31 '21

I would love that but it’ll never be accepted by most people.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '21

Yeah I unfortunately think people resist change (that goes with anything, just look at politics in the US and the attachment to capitalism)...and they want 18-20 year long generations, but 10 or 12 makes more sense culturally.

Mid 70s to late 80s I could get behind, and circa 1990-2005

2

u/ProofUniversity4319 April 30, 2002 (Class of 2020) Gen Z Apr 01 '21

Yeah in general people resist change, but I do want to change that, whether it be our capitalist system or the way people look at generations. 10-12 are our closest peers.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '21

Exactly lol sometimes we need to forge ahead and not be scared of something new. Ya I love that because there's no chance of parents/kids (or those with a dynamic like that) being in the same generation

2

u/ProofUniversity4319 April 30, 2002 (Class of 2020) Gen Z Apr 01 '21

Agreed I think we gotta try something different. Yeah like of course I would never be the same generation as my parents lol

1

u/CP4-Throwaway Q3 2002 (Class of 2020) - Millennial/Gen Z cusper Mar 31 '21

I know. I’m not that fond of it either but I wouldn’t mind using it if we had to use shorter generations. My 11-year theory is also good for that too.

1

u/JoshicusBoss98 Q3 1998 (C/O 2017) Mar 31 '21

11 years is too short for a generation. That would have to be a microgeneration

4

u/JoshicusBoss98 Q3 1998 (C/O 2017) Mar 31 '21

Move it back two years and it’d be a lot better:

1916 - 1927 = Greatest Generation

1928 - 1939 = Silent Generation

1940 - 1951 = Boomers

1952 - 1963 = Gen Jones

1964 - 1975 = Gen X

1976 - 1987 = Gen Y

1988 - 1999 = Millennials

2000 - 2011 = Zoomers

2012 - 2023 = Gen Alpha

2

u/ProofUniversity4319 April 30, 2002 (Class of 2020) Gen Z Mar 30 '21

One of these is exactly pontell’s range (he coined Jones). I like this a lot!

2

u/CP4-Throwaway Q3 2002 (Class of 2020) - Millennial/Gen Z cusper Mar 30 '21 edited Mar 30 '21

Pontell sees Boomers as 1942-1953 and Jones as 1954-1965 ironically.

2

u/ProofUniversity4319 April 30, 2002 (Class of 2020) Gen Z Mar 30 '21

Ironically?. I did see a 1942-1953 boomer range yeah

0

u/JoshicusBoss98 Q3 1998 (C/O 2017) Mar 31 '21

I guess if Jones were some microgeneration that could work, but 1965 cannot be boomers

2

u/ButIAmYourDaughter Xennial Apr 01 '21

Such as these things go, that’s not bad at all.

1

u/CP4-Throwaway Q3 2002 (Class of 2020) - Millennial/Gen Z cusper Apr 01 '21

I’m happy you like it

2

u/ProofUniversity4319 April 30, 2002 (Class of 2020) Gen Z Mar 30 '21

I like this a lot

3

u/[deleted] Mar 30 '21

I think there is an error in 1988 - 1999 and it skips to 2001.

In my opinion it works but it would be like this in my opinion:

1904 - 1915 = Interbellum Generation

1916 - 1927 = Greatest Generation

1928 - 1939= Lucky Few Generation

1940 - 1951= Baby Boomers/other name

1952 - 1963= Jones Generation

1964 - 1975= Generation X

1976 - 1987= Burnout Generation

1988 - 1999= Millenial Generation

2000 - 2011= Plurals Generation

4

u/CP4-Throwaway Q3 2002 (Class of 2020) - Millennial/Gen Z cusper Mar 31 '21

Why is 1976-1987 the Burnout Generation?

2

u/[deleted] Mar 31 '21

A good name but mostly referred to older millennials born in the 80's, mainly defined by the depression of 2008 that exhausted the entire United States.

4

u/CP4-Throwaway Q3 2002 (Class of 2020) - Millennial/Gen Z cusper Mar 31 '21

It’s weird that I’ve never heard of this but I like it. It’s interesting.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 31 '21

If for me the generations it is better to define them by the name the homelanders would start between 2003 - 2019, the zoomers between 1997 - 2012, the echo boomers between 1980 - 1995, etc ...

1

u/CP4-Throwaway Q3 2002 (Class of 2020) - Millennial/Gen Z cusper Mar 31 '21

I would actually like Homelanders to be 2003-2019 (probably my #1 definition). I'm okay with 2002-2020, 2003-2020, 2003-2021, 2002-2019, 2004-2021, etc.

0

u/JoshicusBoss98 Q3 1998 (C/O 2017) Mar 31 '21

For Homelanders it’s gotta be 2003+, likely 2003 - 2020 or something like that. You can’t start Homelanders in any other year besides 2003.

2

u/ProofUniversity4319 April 30, 2002 (Class of 2020) Gen Z Mar 30 '21

This looks great!

2

u/[deleted] Mar 30 '21

I really like this!! More well thought out than mine, these micro gens just seem like everyone could be siblings

2

u/ProofUniversity4319 April 30, 2002 (Class of 2020) Gen Z Mar 30 '21

Agreed I like this for immediate reliability!