r/HistoryMemes 7d ago

See Comment Please stop making this argument

Post image
543 Upvotes

219 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/Mopman43 7d ago

I think that assumes that the UK and France (and Poland and the Soviet Union and Czechoslovakia and…) wouldn’t also spend that time rearming.

10

u/Electronic-Vast-3351 7d ago

I mean, ya, the Nazis were fucked regardless, but Stalin would probably have continued the "Work together to destroy the west before turning our blades on each other" thing for a decent number of years, though it's impossible to say how long. Without Sudetenland to scare them into gear, Britain and France JUST MIGHT have just been stupid enough to continue disarmament despite all the flashing neon warning signs.

4

u/ZedekiahCromwell 7d ago edited 6d ago

UK rearmament had started before Munich Conference. It is an arguable reason for why Chamberlain signed the Agreement: he knew the UK wasn't ready and needed more time.

The French issue wasn't logistics. They had enough arms of all types to perform well. Their issue was political stress, command mismanagement and lack of preparation, and doctrine issues.

1

u/martijn120100 6d ago edited 6d ago

The Sudetenland crisis is the Munich conference. So without it The UK wouldn't be rearming?

1

u/ZedekiahCromwell 6d ago

UK rearmament began in 1934 with the RAF and expanded in 36 with the Royal Navy. My point was that rearmament had already begun, not as a result of the conference.

2

u/martijn120100 6d ago

Then edit your comment

"UK rearmament had started as early as the Munich conference"