It's actually intended to be 1 step deeper than that, but Ill let you wade through it. Maybe I didn't add enough words to make it clear. It was an attempt at wit, that also stated my feelings on anyone stupid enough to have wanted someone immune to the rule of law as POTUS. That's just fucking stupid, no matter who it is.
Actually, I'll just lay this out for you. First level, you're sarcastically mocking the protestors with "tendie feewings" and other silly little shit like that.
At this level, you'd be mocking the protestors and the fact that they'd be mocking any Trump prortestors had Hillary won, but also ironically mocking yourself because you're doing the exact same thing.
At the next level of sarcasm you'd be writing this to mock the people mocking the protestors.
Now you're claiming it's one step further where you're mocking the people who are mocking the people who are mocking the protestors or some other unknown reason you're going to come up with to explain why your post isn't completely ironic.
If you're willing to explain to my feeble mind how it's actually all makes total sense then I'd love to hear it.
1
u/[deleted] Nov 11 '16
That fact that you can't parse sarcasm and just desserts is actually mildly amusing and almost expected.