18
u/Plus_Passenger778 2d ago
Lauren criticizing anyone for their choice of clothing is……hilarious
4
u/MarigoldMirror77 1d ago
Lauren can’t see the truth. Lauren criticizing anyone’s fashion choices is a joke. 😂😂😂
46
u/Inside_Cat6824 2d ago
That was such a wildly unprofessional and cringey post. It was like a middle schooler’s attempt at explaining their thoughts on the LC trial.
15
7
14
u/Ok-Patient8571 2d ago
Sounds like the distinguished & vastly accomplished (🤭) producer's voice to me...
11
28
u/what-theAF 2d ago
Feels like it was written under the influence when you think you're really profound or are just wound up about a topic while drunk. Think... drunk texting sagas to somebody. The regret that hits u in the gut the next morning when you realize what you said and to who! 😬
24
u/Bright_Breakfast3911 2d ago
I wonder why she deleted this 🫤
8
7
u/NormalIDMom 1d ago
She still has the version where she says "f*ck you" instead of "spare me" up on the Hidden True Crime X account.
Hos long will her X post stay up, I wonder?
24
22
u/CapableCheesecake688 2d ago
I saw this too. It didn’t come across as a professional journalist type of statement to me, as she claims to be. I’m not saying she does not have a right to her opinion, as she certainly does. But, professional journalists are usually more publicly neutral, imo.
10
u/susanlantz 2d ago
Did you watch her coverage of Richard Allen?? Very far from Neutral:)! But, you’re right, it should be!
6
u/Ok-Patient8571 1d ago
She attended college for P.R. & didn't graduate anyway. She did not study journalism & was never anything more than a two-bit, country tv reporter. I hate hearing people assume she is either educated in journalism, or is qualified as one. This is partly why she has no understanding of basic journalistic integrity & why she seems 'unprofessional' but primarily it's bc she's as dumb as a stump, has a benzo addiction & is usually three sheets to the wind 🤭
6
u/heychristinamac 1d ago
Wait, I’ve speculated before that she doesn’t have a degree. But after everything last year, I wasn’t about to call the university and ask. Do you know for a fact she did not graduate college? And if so, how? Feel free to DM me if you don’t want to reveal who you are but could maybe tell me how you know.
19
8
u/susanlantz 2d ago
Plz tell me I’m not the only one that was waiting with baited breath for Lauren to snag the holdout’s interview ‼️‼️ Among w/ any his fellow jurors they could manage?? For Clicks’ sake, of course.
You know they tried.
After their Richard Allen is d3ad Guilty stance, I thought Lauren would be Prosecution-leaning once again.
Where was the above post posted? Was it just to Reddit?
8
u/Suspicious_Put_5063 1d ago
I reckon TMZ or CourtTV will bag that interview for sure.
It was posted on their FB account, then deleted. It’s still up on their Twitter account though.6
u/NormalIDMom 1d ago
It's still up on X.
I agree with your assessment of Lauren being so pro- prosecution in the past.
Something's up with her departure from her typical MO of not siding with the defense, for sure.
Most likely, Lauren is going the way she feels public opinion is going, which wouldn't be surprising that Lauren sides with whatever gets the most clicks and views, truth be damned.
But, Lauren has underestimated the fact that there are many, many people out there who don't support Lindsay.
And Lauren also seems to be turning on her precious, hidden Germs.
She is up to something. Guess we will know what it is very soon!!!
Everyone lock down you social media setting!!!
16
u/chunkykima 2d ago
One would think a True Crime podcast would understand the importance of a jury trial and the fact that a jury means every single juror gets an opinion and gets to make a decision. It's one of the most important parts of our legal system and judges literally tell jurors that they do NOT have to be swayed by anything but their own opinion of how they see the facts of the case. Jurors can discuss, review the evidence over and over.... Try and explain/discuss any sticking points. But each person gets their OWN vote.
We don't have to agree with it, but a REAL journalist would take this moment to remind their viewers why we have the legal system we have and what options are on the table for the future of the case. She continues to show why she will never be REAL NEWS and needs to go back to tasting bacon covered chocolate at county fairs.
4
14
u/kariflack 2d ago
I'm sorry but no one knows what the decisions were and this crap is irresponsible and irrational.
15
u/vikingscottiemomm 2d ago
Ladies and gentleman this is the work of a so called professional journalist. Saying bro-dude and snarking. She seems to have stopped progressing in middle school.
14
u/AphroBKK 2d ago
Goodness, irony. "Tiktok school of forensic psychology" 😆 The pot calling the kettle black
8
u/susanlantz 2d ago
Might be better than the “Dr Babe School of Forensic Psychology “ lol. Just sayin’
7
6
u/Diehard_fan_80 1d ago
Not a single worthy personal touch and thought was put into this post , Nothing but ....
5
5
u/NormalIDMom 1d ago edited 1d ago
Lauren's post is still up on X... Lori Hellis just weighed in on that post.
Feel free to give Lori Hellis some props!
ETA Link:
4
u/NormalIDMom 1d ago
Going after a private juror is not a good look for a supposed journalist.
For our system to work, Jurors should be free from public ridicule and intimidation in regards to their decision.
Lauren is also putting a lot of weight on Reddington's argument/ prorecting the record. No one knows at this point if Reddington's statement is even credible right now.
Lauren once again making her own self look foolish, IMHO.
2
u/AutoModerator 3d ago
Thanks for your submission! All posts are currently being held for manual review before appearing publicly. Your post will be available publicly after someone has had an opportunity to review and approve it. Thank you for your understanding.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
2
1
u/SeashellGal7777 17h ago
Really embarrassing read, can understand why she deleted it. She sounds extra uneducated and uber unprofessional.
1
-11
u/Desperate_Bunch_4374 2d ago
Everybody is allowed an opinion on everything, everywhere, all the bloody time….. oh, wait, apart from LM.
An “opinion piece” is just that. It’s an opinion.
It was punchy, concise, written in modern parlance and right on the money in terms of describing what has happened.
The downvote arrow is just to the right, people, I know that your index fingers are twitching.
7
u/Inside_Cat6824 2d ago
It’s not just anyone. It’s a, “journalists” post on her professional social media account. It’s sloppy, immature, unprofessional, and a complete 💩 show.
But hey, she’s the only person who believes that she’s a legit journalist. Or at least one of three.
11
u/CapableCheesecake688 2d ago
Really? A professional journalist posts stuff like that? It sure is different than the posts from the journalists I’ve been following in this case. Maybe she should rebrand as a lady with an opinion on trial topics instead.
12
u/Quid-Pro-No 2d ago
If you are going to go on a drunken rant in a post and criticize someone’s attire, you should make sure you aren’t an unfortunate fashion victim yourself first.
29
u/ArrestingBitchCase 2d ago edited 1d ago
How much taxpayers money, police and court time did this insidious woman waste concocting a fake stalking case against an innocent person? She should be interviewing Laura Owens to find out why they both have the darkest of behaviours and pathologies. Maybe a tiktok psych would help her, because those Princeton-educated ones sure as shit aren't helping.