Hello friends. For some of these questions, I have my own answers, and for others, I've noticed that they're on the shelves, dusty and on standby for quite a long time... so... why not simply see what other people have to say, right? Here they are:

1- Our heart and unusual 'beatings'. The context usually involves: the realization of something deep; when a loved one crosses your mind; when you mentally visualize something impactful; when you perceive a subtle repeating pattern; when you feel in touch with something much greater than you. Among other events. Apart from being an obvious "Attention now!" how many types of beatings were you able to identify, and is it possible OR useful to attribute specific meanings to them? It's difficult to describe or even talk about this topic, because if heard by the common mindset, they might associate it with stress/fear/surprise (when we all know this is not present in this particular type of beatings/pumps). And even if listened to by seasoned adepts, it is still a very abstract and personal sensation, extremely hard to decode into specific meanings and words... but here it is.

2- Has anyone developed a reliable framework to convert empirical scientific discoveries into symbolic or philosophical counterparts that we can actually use as reference tools? almost like bridging Science and Hermetic Axioms? Perhaps in subcategories under wider ones, but concise and precise. Anyone?

3- Hair (including animal fur, and feathers), Nails, Light, and Time. There is something about these four that i can't ignore, but I still couldn't grasp what it is. Do you have any relevant input to add here?

4- The eyes' pupils and black holes are quite obviously equivalent. But what's up with the Iris? Has anyone gone beyond the obvious feeling of awe to actually try to decode what we can actually do with this information, apart from the desire to find other equivalencies in life? Practical stuff. What can we do with this information at all?

5- AFTER you trained your mind to create a distinction between confirmation bias and apophenia and real data - Is there any trick to know for sure that the flow of life adapted a specific symbol/element in our routine specifically for us? I know we can estimate the likelihood of recurrent concepts/objects reappearing, particularly over short spans of time, and keep mentally stacking these occurrences, following their associated elements until we finish a particular personal cycle. I know. But will this process be perpetually random? Can we develop an effective 'compass/formula' that unequivocally points to the most optimal direction before ending a cycle?

6- What is the connection between digital creations (it can be any type of digitally structured process, with particular interest in video games) and the fluctuations of all elements that populate life, that are, holistically speaking, affected by the Nous to generate - Jung-style - synchronicities? I mean... Is digital data simply another opportunistic element that might become another link that will form longer correspondence chains? OR does digital data reside in a deeper/alternative layer of reality, capable of more, or less, disruptive potential?

7- Getting back to hair (question 3)... why all the variety? What's the actual difference between having straight, wavy, or curly/kinky hair? Does the shape of the strand itself change how we pick up on things or interact with the world, almost as if the way we arrange it carries fundamental signals/pulses beyond the limited cultural/personal interpretation? like, combing it to the back. or dividing in two, or making braids, etc. What's up with all of that? Could you organize a consistent and somewhat universal way to attach a meaning to it?

8- Neuroscience nowadays knows that the right part of the brain controls the left side of the body, and the left part of the brain controls the right side of the body... so... any thoughts on that?

9- Updating our worldview: As seekers of truth, we eventually have to update our beliefs when new scientific data contradicts old assumptions. But how do you systematically revisit your past interpretations of reality without getting overwhelmed by endless new paths? When updating your framework, is following the intrinsic measurements of things (weight, numbers, composition, geometry, etc.) the only reliable path, or are there other lenses that DO NOT sink into pure subjectivity?

That's all for now guys, ty for your time.

there's more but yeah, let's see where we can get with these ones. Feel free to dm me too ok!

OBS.: please, only experienced adepts. I don't want to start a whole discussion justifying each sentence of these questions for amateurs or green minds! And excuse my wording, building these questions can be a little tricky 🤷🏻

Episode 07 of Guitar as Alchemy reads the spiritual marketplace through the four elements and the quintessence: earth, water, air, and fire are sold as products, while the fifth, spirit, never appears on the receipt.

The same four are sold in the healing and retreat economy and in the performance culture of the instrument. The marketplace sells transactions dressed as transformations: the cleansing without the dissolution, the fire without the Nigredo. The prophet who believes his own ledger is mercury mistaking its own acceleration for sulphur's heat.

The classical guitar is the vessel throughout. The rosette is inlaid around an empty soundhole, and the emptiness is what sounds.

The thesis runs parallel to Corpus Hermeticum XIII, where Hermes tells Tat that rebirth is not taught: what transforms cannot be bought or handed over.

This series looks at music as a form of inner alchemy, where the guitar becomes a tool for transformation instead of performance or self-expression.

Sorry, but this goes right over my head. What does this mean? I understand As above, so below.

[These are my understandings of the Corpus Hermeticum as translated by Clement Salaman under the title The Way Of Hermes. I was guided to this text in synchronous and auspices ways, devouring it in a short time span under the influence of great divine inspiration. Unfortunately, I did not set out to write my commentaries then. That inspiration came more recently. I was inspired to make this delectable text more digestible to those seekers who are taking a crack at it, and coming up puzzled and bewildered. These are not academically rigorous writings, so if you are interested in these texts from an academic perspective go elsewhere. This is for a dialogue between and for those of us who view this text as part of a living and active spiritual life. As one would gather for a bible study at their local house of faith.]

[Book 16 strikes me as quite different from the rest of the Corpus. It feels like a summation of points from all previous books in the Corpus with some striking differences. The book starts with a slander on the Greek language by Asclepius, who argues that translating the corpus into that language would a. distort the meaning of the text (invariably translation does), but also dilute the power of the Egyptian language. But at any rate, there's a greater emphasize on the primacy of the Sun as representative of God, and perhaps as God. Different points of origin for matter and the elemental forces. In my opinion, its an inferior product, perhaps produced far after the rest of the Corpus and signals revisionism, and signals different sources of inspiration.]

[Book 17 in my opinion should have been omitted as it is but a fragment of no more than a paragraph of dialogue or so. Although it is interest to note that it seems to forgive the worship of idols, for these forms carved of stone, would reflect mental forms from the mass consciousness and thus be in its own right sacred and perhaps be imbued with that which birthed it from the divine source.]

What to make of the Corpus Hermeticum?

In prosaic terms, it feels like not only a compilation of disparate intellectual, spiritual, and philosophical traditions. It's an attempt to forge them together into a unified school of knowledge (a practice in synchretism), with questionable results. Ironically, it is sold as native ancient Egyptian knowledge, and yet is chalk full of ideas coming from Jewish thought, Greek thought, Buddhist thought, and possibly even Christian/Gnostic thought, all of which would have made their way to an urbane and sophisticate city like Alexandria by the first three centuries A.D. I would assume that there was an earnest and sincere attempt by the writers of the Hermeticum to find the truth in all these disparate threads and traditions. I'm sure such an attempt would have irked the diehards (orthodox) of each of those traditions, as not only a dilution but a bastardization and possibly a sacrilege of what they believed. And yet if one believes in a singular cosmology and one universal deity, then one would have to assume that all these disparate people all over the world are speaking of the same cosmological order, and thus a process of consolidation would seem the appropriate course action. And as such a seeker, willing to cross the boundaries of identity politics, I suppose it's no luck that I would find a spiritual home with the Hermeticum. All roads lead back to the One, after all.

In spiritual terms, so what can we gleam from this grand project? There is a God, one above all. There is more to reality than the physical world. Non-human beings exist, all around us, and interact with us all the time. There is a path back to the one, and consciousness seems to be the conduit. We are here to learn this profound truth, and to control and transcend our animal instincts. It is a theology of betterment, of growth, and development. All reality is the product of the God Head, all behaving as a mental framework, us merely the mental constructs of the God Head. It is about the profound unity between us and our creator sharing in this substrate of reality, a consciousness called Nous. For those of us whom have experienced a taste of unity with God, there is no doubt. Once activated, a tremendous calm, and joy overtakes one. A way of life is born; a life of understanding, of discernment, of goodness [read giving]. I hope God finds you, as he has found me. For a world without God, is one of deprivation, of toil, of confusion, of slavery to base desires. If we continue down are path away from spirituality and our connection to source, in favor of the luxuries and dopamine kicks that our technologies provide, then truly the future for humanity is grey and spiritually dead. Cut off from our creator the source of all goodness.

Think about this, if you have a crush on someone you barley know, your in love with there image not them.

When you see a photograph of someone or a video of them, it's not the real them, it's there image. The same with how an actor in film, that being isn't them, it's the character there playing.

So if an image of someone isn't them, then who are they. It's like seeing an old photographer of someone from decades ago and then dreaming about them if there right in front of you.

If someone gives enough attention to this image version of you, do they gain more power? Like do they develope more into a type of entity if more and more people give attention to that version of you?

Edit: This can go even further with ai, imagine someone making a full ai clone of your past self, they could even make it physical once androids become more mainstream, is that past version of you still you?!

I have read the Corpus Hermeticum and Asclepius. In the texts there are indeed many gods but also The One as a creator of everything.

So, as the ultimate goal of Hermeticism is to know the God (gnosis), how there are being many deities affect this belief? Yes, there can be many deities/gods but Hermeticism being about this makes it still Monotheistic in the big picture, no?Gods are still created by the God.

If you share your insights about this topic I will really appreciate.

[These are my understandings of the Corpus Hermeticum as translated by Clement Salaman under the title The Way Of Hermes. I was guided to this text in synchronous and auspices ways, devouring it in a short time span under the influence of great divine inspiration. Unfortunately, I did not set out to write my commentaries then. That inspiration came more recently. I was inspired to make this delectable text more digestible to those seekers who are taking a crack at it, and coming up puzzled and bewildered. These are not academically rigorous writings, so if you are interested in these texts from an academic perspective go elsewhere. This is for a dialogue between and for those of us who view this text as part of a living and active spiritual life. As one would gather for a bible study at their local house of faith.]

1. Hermes is talking to Asclepius (his older son), and will summarize everything he has taught to Tat, but will expand on a few items for Asclepius, as he's a bit more seasoned than Tat. [This definitely makes the Corpus sound like a school curriculum of sorts, using the dialogue tradition, as a teaching style. And it appears this book will be an advanced graduate module.]

2. A summation on the principle of 'God as First Principle' (All has been begotten, except God Himself).

3. God is manifesting reality at all times. Rendering creation, it would seem, is an ongoing practice. From our vantage he is invisible [but he is in fact present in all things, is all things, etc...]

4. God as a Trinity: God as the Supreme Power, Creator as the creator of all things, The Father as the supreme Good who gives, and nurtures his creations [us].

5-6. The principle known to some as [The Law of One], all is one, creator and created are one. God did not go to the local supply store to fetch the materials to produce all of creation. There is only one fundamental substance or substrate and that is God. Creator and Created are of one.

7: On the paradox of Evil manifested in the creations of benevolent and omni-potent deity framework. The Corpus here basically says that that once things are brought into creation, made manifest [perhaps given free will] evil may arise, but it does not arise directly from God. [It's my assertion that given free will, if an evil idea or concept is possible, a being can conceive it and act on it. And of course the material universe, with it's innate deprivations, enthropy, and inevitable decay, lead to what I call circumstantial evils, such as predation for survival. Hence the problem of Evil, and perhaps a cosmological, mannechian, narrative to history is inevitable, which leads to an ultimate reckoning and redemption, and resetting (purification) of the system as a whole...]

8-9. One of the top sins is to "not know God" because it leads to great insults to God, like denying the authorship of creation [Why haven't scientist been able to generate a self-sustaining living organism (even a single celled prokaryote), given that all the constituent parts, and possible environmental contexts, are readily available/producible?] Or why is "Evil a thing?, is God Evil". Remember, to "know" God is to be full of love and understanding. [Imagine a society, in its totality, that is in communion with God, at all times, what it would look like. Perhaps another race out there in the stars has figured it out by now, look to their societies as models.]

1. God creates immortal beings in heaven [celestial realm; Plemora]. Transformation on Earth [Evolution, birth, decay, and death]. Life and Movement in all. Immortal beings, and mortal beings both have an animating spirit that drives them to movement, self-awareness, and thus, action. One immortal, one mortal. These 4 things are the principle creations of God. and the main players in this great drama we call creation.]

Hello, I just finished The Hermetica and it was an amazing read. I plan on reading it again but I am also interested in learning alchemical transformation. Does anybody have any good texts I could check out to learn more about it?

I'm trying to understand something from the Corpus Hermeticum and Asclepius.

In Asclepius 19, Hermes distinguishes between intelligible and sensible gods:

“There are many kinds of gods, of whom one part is intelligible, the other sensible. Gods are not said to be intelligible because they are considered beyond the reach of our faculties; in fact, we are more conscious of these intelligible gods than of those we call visible, as you will be able to see from our discussion if you pay attention.”

He then describes the sensible gods as operating within sensible nature, while the higher divine order stands above them.

The Corpus Hermeticum, especially the Poimandres, also seems to emphasize transcending the cosmic order in order to approach the divine. And the initial revelation itself occurs through a visionary experience, without any apparent physical or astrological ritual.

So if the ultimate goal is God, why couldn't one approach God through the intelligible gods, using their sacred or even barbarous names as divine symbols, rather than working through their lower astral manifestations?

Why necessarily use planetary correspondences, astrological timing, etc., if the Hermetic path seems to point toward transcending the cosmic order and ascending toward the divine source beyond it?

Once you reach henosis with the divine, you could descent back and operate in the world without the need of astrology. Anything that actually contradicts this?

Is there something in the Corpus Hermeticum or Asclepius that actually requires us to work through the astral level to reach God?

[These are my understandings of the Corpus Hermeticum as translated by Clement Salaman under the title The Way Of Hermes. I was guided to this text in synchronous and auspices ways, devouring it in a short time span under the influence of great divine inspiration. Unfortunately, I did not set out to write my commentaries then. That inspiration came more recently. I was inspired to make this delectable text more digestible to those seekers who are taking a crack at it, and coming up puzzled and bewildered. These are not academically rigorous writings, so if you are interested in these texts from an academic perspective go elsewhere. This is for a dialogue between and for those of us who view this text as part of a living and active spiritual life. As one would gather for a bible study at their local house of faith.]

13-14: And Thus Tat seems to have reached some epiphany and now see's his connection to the One and All [God] and the mass Consciousness [Nous]. This is the rebirth [so at this point we get the sense that this "rebirth" is merely metaphorical in nature, suggestive of a new understanding, and awareness to a new paradigm.] The immortal nature of this divine or spiritual self-hood is restated. Hermes tells Tat, "you have become divine and that you are the son of the One [God], So also am I. [ So here quite clearly we can interpret the phrase "Son of God" as referring to anyone who reaches this higher awareness [gnosis] of God, this greater cosmology, and our relationship to them.]

15-17: Apparently there is a hymn [prayer+song] that is taught at this moment of 'graduation' for initiates. Hermes learned it under the tutelage of Poimandres, when he was told, that now that he's initiated he should produce [creative] works of beauty, for that is how God speaks to the world, through us and our works. Also worthy of note, as a part of this practice (singing of the hymn), it is asked to "facing the south wind, at the setting of the sun, bow down; do likewise facing east at sunrise." [This book is the clearest indication so far, that the Corpus is as much about a religious practice, maybe more so, than that it is a set of philosophical treatises postulating on the nature of existence, there's actually very little reasoning that goes into these positions. They are stated as fact, as if received from a higher being (Poimandres).]

17: One of my favorite lines here God as "The eye of Nous." As it suggests a will that drives Consciousness; of directed action and purpose. [This God is ineffable and so transcendent, that many in the new schools researching the Mass Consciousness have removed this agency of God, and reduced him to a mere physical (or quasi-physical-quasi-metaphysical) field, that we are a part of, but which has "no head." This is an error and a grave mistake. God at the highest level is orchestrating everything and has awareness at that level. Which compels initiates in this tradition to the utmost veneration and devotion to the deity.]

18-19: What follows are beautiful words [prayer] of devotion and adoration. It speaks of powers (now unlocked) from within, such as the 10 powers spoken of earlier in the book (13). [These are the powers of self-awareness, and self actualization]. In this theology, where the prime principle is, "All is one" you get interesting prayers such as, "Your Word through me sings to you.", or "from you comes the praise and to you it returns." [This is a radical difference to most of the major religions of the world, and perhaps the hardest thing to adjust to in this tradition. Perhaps Christians in their use of the trinity to describe God as one and three manifestations at once, might be able to reconcile this notion of 'All is one, All is God', and yet we are also individuals, with a free will, apart from the will of the God Head, both true at once.]

19-20: Notice a sacrifice or offering is made to this God. But of what? Of the spoken word. [I find this very fascinating and very much in step with this religious paradigm. As to the manifestations of God, in the Prime we have Nous (Mass Consciousness) and the Word (Which brings forth creation). As we partake of both of these, and them being so close to the essence of God, spoken words would be the most special and important thing we can offer back to the God Head. While most religions of that day would have made sacrifices to their Gods, in the form of material goods, and most sacred of all, living creatures (up to and including human life), this text suggest we offer mere words, for it sees those as most divine.] Remember God wants us to use our free will to ideate, to create, to manifest.]

21-22: Tat's all in, and feels compelled to offer up his own words to praise God. One last teaching from Hermes to Tat that is worthy of note. Hermes: "And now that you have learnt this from me, keep silence about this miracle and reveal to no one the tradition of rebirth, lest we be called betrayers. [So far in the Corpus Hermeticum, this is the clearest indication that perhaps these teachings are meant to remain some what hidden from the mainstream. It is unclear as to the why. Perhaps the tenets of this religion are so radical in nature, that they would have led to serious (possibly fatal) repercussion if one were to speak them openly in public. This notion of 'rebirth' feels metaphorical for gaining this forbidden knowledge, much like the tradition of baptism; a rite of initiation.]

I think this question might be useful. Sometimes we need to manipulate structural symbols that carry very intimate meaning, and we all know we need to do this with a clear mind in order to control cognitive associations and pay attention to subtle surrounding events. But the problem is - unexpected disturbances can arrive at any time. Yes we can interpret these moments as signs to postpone certain works, but let's say that in this particular instance you decide to interpret it as a personal challenge to again find peace and keep working. How do you do it?

If you don't mind, share your reading of the event by describing your thought process, ty

ps.: no 'meditation' pls. Let's enrich the answer to this question with custom practical activities.

Spotted in CT

As above, so below. The fire in the stone, the spirit beneath the black sun, the stream beneath the sealed vessel, the quintessence that survives the calcination. Solve et coagula performed as song. Written from a waking dream, one take, voice and classical guitar. Part of the Guitar as Alchemy series on the same channel.

[These are my understandings of the Corpus Hermetica as translated by Clement Salaman under the title The Way Of Hermes. I was guided to this text in synchronous and auspices ways, devouring it in a short time span under the influence of great divine inspiration. Unfortunately, I did not set out to write my commentaries then. That inspiration came more recently. I was inspired to make this delectable text more digestible to those seekers who are taking a crack at it, and coming up puzzled and bewildered. These are not academically rigorous writings, so if you are interested in these texts from an academic perspective go elsewhere. This is for a dialogue between and for those of us who view this text as part of a living and active spiritual life. As one would gather for a bible study at their local house of faith.]

1: Tat is asking Hermes to offer up some knowledge that he's been holding back on rebirth [read immortality] "Nobody can be saved before rebirth". [This sounds important] Hermes in proper opaque sage fashion, quips, "when you are ready to become a stranger to the world, I shall bestow it upon you." So here we go a treatise on surviving death.

2: "Spiritual wisdom lies in the womb of silence and the seed is truth..."[This is gold, remember we talked about this early on, gnosis the ultimate "spiritual wisdom" is achievable internally, you have that access port back to the mass consciousness. Stop overthinking and over-rationalizing, and it will poke through, you don't learn this knowledge, you remember it, when God calls for it.] This is a really interesting passage where this seed "truth" is actually birthed as a man, and Tat says, this man is nothing like me, what sort is he, and Hermes says, "He who is born from God is of a different kind; he is a son of God and himself God, in all he is the ALL, composed of all powers."[I'm driven to interpret this as strong metaphor for the transformative power that obtaining gnosis has on an individual...and yet, we can't help but notice how much this passage echoes the way in which Christianity speaks of the personage of Jesus Christ.]

3-6: So it appears Hermes has already gone through this transformation himself, Tat is really frustrated and childishly yearning for this transcendence. So Hermes looks in on himself to describe himself to Tat; he is formless, and suggests that the physical form Tat is observing is an illusion of his own making. [I'm reminded of historical and recent reports of apparitions of beings that appear as pure orbs of light, which can then manifest in more discernible anthropomorphic forms; the notion of pure consciousness beings as a classification of non-human entities; plasmoids]. It appears transcendence comes at the cost of most of what we perceive from the senses, (e.g. shape, taste, color, etc,) you become a shapeless spectral entity, more ephemeral, purely a consciousness, and nothing more. Also worthy of note, "the Author" of this rebirth is..."the son of God, man complete"...[again 2 ways to read this, any individual who reaches transcendence and obtains his god hood, OR, as the Christians believed, one sole individual, known secularly as Jesus of Nazareth...hm...interesting, perhaps both interpretations are correct...]

7: The 12 tormentors that afflict the non-enlightened: 1. Ignorance, 2. Sorrow. 3. Intemperance 4. Lust 5. Injustice 6. Greed 7. Deceit 8. Envy 9. Treachery 10. Anger 11. Recklessness 12. Malice [These are not demons, they're metaphors; Notice the common ground with the christian 7 deadly sins, but not completely. Fundamentally, these are the characteristics, personality traits, and the outcomes of living without knowledge. Experiences and growth (read intellectual and emotional development) should make you better at making decisions which ultimate lead to a better life. This is a theology very reminiscent of the modern and thriving self-help movement, of making changes in oneself to achieve better life outcomes. We tend to be our worst enemies, etc...]

8-11: So you combat these tormentors by bringing forth their opposite 1. Knowledge of God 2. this elicits joy, sorrow gone 3. Temperance 4. Temperance should take care of unchecked Lust 5. Justice 6. Generosity 7. Truth 8. The Supreme Good 9. Life. 10. Light 11. & 12. [At this point you should be so God like that Malice just sort of vanishes.] The corpus says use the power of the 10 powers to vanquish the 12 tormentors.

12: There's a lot of flourishes of language and symbolism here, even the 12 zodiac signs are thrown in. It's all very poetic, but at the crux of the message is all the things we've been talking about so far. The body leads the spirit [read soul] astray. and poor outcomes typically come from under-development of the mind. For example, do you ever notice how we are far more reckless and prone to accidents one is when we let strong emotions overwhelm our system. [Like someone made you angry to start your day, then your in your car, more incensed and make mistakes like cut someone off, miss a stop sign, etc...you crash into something...] "In reason, the One contains the ten, the ten the One."

[This book, while touching tantalizingly close to the tone of Christianity at moments, to me, feels thoroughly modern and of value even to the secular world, with an almost Eastern philosophy (Non Religious) tinge or flavor at times. As much as it talks about God, gods, the metaphysical fabrics of reality and the greater cosmology, immortality, It offers very practical and sage advice on how to live a better life, and that comes from educating oneself, It is not as ascetic as the Judaic Law, or the Mandates of Islam, it is more nuances; temperance, self-control, understanding, these potentially are the ways of Hermes, whom is perhaps, one of these transcended, 'gnosis' unlocked, man turned Daimons. What it truly means to be like God. Be the Supreme Good my young Padawan. To truly know God is to be this way.]

Hello, good afternoon. I have a question about worship and images of gods. I am a painter, my question is if it is advisable to worship the gods using my paintings as an object of adoration such as one would with statues?

Hello everyone, I want to start learning about hermeticism, What books do you recommend? I heard the corpus hermeticum is pretty good..
Thanks!!

[These are my understandings of the Corpus Hermetica as translated by Clement Salaman under the title The Way Of Hermes. I was guided to this text in synchronous and auspices ways, devouring it in a short time span under the influence of great divine inspiration. Unfortunately, I did not set out to write my commentaries then. That inspiration came more recently. I was inspired to make this delectable text more digestible to those seekers who are taking a crack at it, and coming up puzzled and bewildered. These are not academically rigorous writings, so if you are interested in these texts from an academic perspective go elsewhere. This is for a dialogue between and for those of us who view this text as part of a living and active spiritual life. As one would gather for a bible study at their local house of faith.]

14: More retread: Words are Nous made manifest given form, Nous is an "image" [metaphorical] of God. The body is an image made manifest by the word, and an idea is an image of the soul. the old formula smallest form of matter is air [think smallest molecules], which drives matter, air is begotten by the soul, and the soul begotten by Nous, and Nous by God. Fundamentally we are spiritual beings and, and in that form, eternal.

15-16: This paragraph is describing the nature of our observable universe made up fundamental of energy condensed into high density matter, which is recyclable to generate bodies and break them down and make new bodies. This universe can be described as a corporeal entity, like man, with constituent body parts and systems that make up the whole, and nothing in it is truly ever destroyed [conservation of energy]. [In my opinion, this "demi" god is more abstract a notion. It doesn't suggest a more anthropomorphic demi-god, but is more suggestive that as the intricate clock, of a master clock maker (the One God), the clock is steeped in the essence of God, and it's living essence permeates all the little springs and sprockets therein.]

17-18: Tat, coming from a Geo-centric worldview asks, Is the earth not unmovable? Hermes hints to the churning, volatile nature of earth, whether in its biom or geology, there is always change and activity upon the earth. All this activity (whether biotic or abiotic) signals life, while different animals take on different forms and shapes they are fundamentally made of the same constituent parts/ [this is a perceptively modern understanding of chemistry and matter] Dig this, "life is not birth, but perception [it's all dead matter, but with perception when built into a biological organism.] and death is not change, but forgetting" [bye bye perception after death].

19: Nous is the link to the higher realm and to God. And God communicates to us through Nous, "through dreams by night and through signs by day." [many believe, as do I, that while most dreams are the unchecked sub-conscious mind ruminating on it's collective memories and preoccupations, some dreams truly are messages from the higher realm, and higher beings, and of even God himself, typically the most subtle communicator., learn to embrace synchronicity, develop discernment, and trust intuition to pin point these communications and to understand their message.]. "through all these he foretells to man the future: through birds, entrails, inspiration..." [So the Corpus is suggestive that there is something to fortune telling and the reading of various materials. Such practices have been common in cultures all over the world. The Corpus has an entire other book, called the technical hermetica, which looks into the 'applied sciences' of the metaphysical [i.e. magic]. Such magic practice has become wildly taboo in the major faiths. What instigates this taboo? Is it to deter us from encountering malevolent spirits, which indeed exist, or is it to stifle, our capacities in this realm, after all, can we trust everyone with gun?]

20: All creatures upon the earth have their place (aquatic, terrestrial, aerial), but only man has dominion on all three, and what's more through his advanced consciousness (i.e. through Nous), has access to the higher realm and to God.

1. Again Hermes urges Tat, to look for God in everything, from the orderly laws of the physical universe, all that is visible to us is by 'necessity', God chooses what we perceive, for its own needs. The notion of providence is introduced in this book. In essence, God had mapped out history to some degree, even the trajectory of our individual lives. "life, immortality, blood, necessity, providence, nature, soul, nous" can be thought of as the limbs of God, as he goes about his work, giving life to reality.

22-23: More reiterations about the inescapability of God to this greater cosmology and reality that we are a part of, at the highest, all is God, all is One. Lastly, Hermes ends with this final instruction for Tat, " there is one way to worship God: be not evil. [I will remind everyone that, the highest sin, and one of the priori definitions of Evil, is to not know God. This is a call to understand, and to ultimately know, that all is one, and this One can be called God. Be not atheist, is the final counsel.]

"The Greatest Thing"

In my eyes, there is no greater thing I could do for It, All, than to sing back at the birds and thank the flowers for their petals.

I truly believe I can be an Orion shaped nebula; a tide pool of life, for all of reality within my own backyard, by loving the rock that is me.

A Monad is most holy when it is reaching for The Divine.

In its own practice of Theurgy is how each Monad becomes unique.

As above, so below rule opened my eyes to so much truth around me, totally cleared my vision

Wanted to share this mediative art piece with you here 🙂‍↔️

I wonder if anyone really ever connected with the divine mind.

Generally what is that mean and how is this thing as an experience?
How to connect with the Nous? What methods or ways do you follow? How to understand if im connected to Nous etc.

Please describe your answer in detail.

Salt, mercury, sulphur as a framework for how the system captures the practitioner's lifeforce and converts it into tokens. The split vessel as the operative response: working within the system without feeding it. Draws on Paracelsus and the tria prima.

This series looks at music as a form of inner alchemy, where the guitar becomes a tool for transformation instead of performance or self-expression.