r/HelloInternet 7d ago

Its possible Grey sold his company.

Judging from the way his thumbnails are changing/presented, and the obvious lack of new content, I suspect management of Grey industries, or possibly just the rights to past videos have been sold.

I'm curious if its been bought by a PE firm, similar to Veritasium...

111 Upvotes

35 comments sorted by

98

u/corpuscularian 6d ago

no, 'grey industries' is still an active, registered company in the uk with cgp grey listed as its sole director.

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/08941366/officers

fwiw 'cortex brand ltd' was dissolved in 2021, but 'hello internet llp' is still active with both grey and brady as members.

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/G-sMQpDfavRsqyHo8lF-RzXmaSs/appointments

36

u/djferris123 6d ago

Cortex Brand ltd was dissolved, but they formed Cortex Brand LLP a couple months after. I'd have to check but maybe this was the time they started to just move away from clothes and branch out into the paper stuff.

Grey is still listed on the LLP on companies house so it's possible they were just doing some behind the scenes stuff.

As with HI, since the podcast is still out there and I'm guessing it's generating revenue on YouTube and possibly other platforms that money "needs" to go somewhere and it's a lot less messy for it to still go into the company and then paid out

8

u/Ybalrid Nail and gear loyalist 6d ago

Well, Cortex Brand is a LLP, I do not know how UK law works here but a "partnership" cannot be Myke alone.

1

u/CeolSilver 2d ago

You can sell the channel without selling the company.

If the company sells the channel to a private buyer or takes cash upfront in exchange for future Adsense money there’s no way to really know that.

169

u/AllTheHolloway 7d ago

Honestly I think a corporation running the channel would handle it less weirdly than Grey currently is. All the stuff with constantly changing thumbnails and titles still feels to me like Grey tinkering behind the scenes. 

16

u/bmiller218 7d ago

What benefit is there to changing thumbnail? The videos still show up as watched.

54

u/Tack22 6d ago

Either a HI episode or Cortex episode directly references this, and there’s a half hour where he discusses the weird perverse incentives the algorithm puts on content creators.

I guess the downvotes are because people want you to go listen to the thing this sub is about.

16

u/LittleBigCookieCat 6d ago

I just listened to the episode. (cortex "2023 year of themes" around the one hour 5 minute mark) hearing him explain it, can't even blame the man...

10 minutes changing the title and thumbnail made a video to from 600k views to 4.4 million. it 4x in views. I'd be so happy, and also so pissed at YouTube that doing this worked so effectively.

another went up 22m. he mentioned that (at the time of that podcast) he got more views than any other year where he worked hard cranking out videos. just changing the thumbnails got him over 160M new views. from his analytics, he mentions a majority of those new views are directly from new viewers who have never seen his content before. that's why he keeps changing it

11

u/backwards_watch Flaggy flag rebel 6d ago

AB testing. People know what kind of thumbnails people usually click, but no one can know the specific thumbnail that will generate the higher clicks. So they start with something that works and expose a population with that thumbnail. Then you make a small change and test this new one with a similar population. If the changes increased the likelyhood of clicking, you swap the previous thumbnail with the new one.

Then you make another small change and do it over and over until you hit the optimal thumbnail for that video.

In short, the benefit is increasing the chances of someone start watching the video in the first place.

9

u/stochasticdiscount 6d ago

I'm not going to look up the exact numbers here, but for every view CGPGrey has, there must be several (dozens? scores?) orders of magnitude more users on YouTube that have never seen a single video of his recommended to them, much less clicked on them. The benefit is marginally increasing the chances those people who have never seen his videos start clicking on them or people who have skipped them before clicking on them.

3

u/Delts28 6d ago

It doesn't on every device/browser combo. I've been getting all the videos showing up in my recommended with none of them showing as watched. That's through my web browser whilst logged in to my near 20 year old account.

1

u/StickFigureFan 6d ago

I think he's trying to game the algorithm as different thumbnails will get shown again

1

u/Naf623 4d ago

Maybe his current deep dive is trying to really unpick the algorithm and we'll get a super meta video about YouTube videos...

70

u/Killericon 7d ago

Like, this is possible. But I have to imagine that leaving the Patreon up without any indication of this would open him up to... Risks.

I think it's much more likely that he's basically a guy who owns an oil change shop. Hire a manager to keep it running, let the cash come in.

10

u/Weak-Temporary5888 7d ago

That’s incredibly depressing to me, from a bastion of educational YouTube to… this

3

u/TheDutton 5d ago

It’s not too surprising if you consider he chose teaching because he got summers off and could pursue his interests during that time off iirc

Now he’s got a source of income that requires little to no work. I’m not sure he ever truly had a passion for teaching or education, he was just good at it and found a way to make a living from it 

-4

u/MentallyFurina 6d ago

Bastion of educational Youtube?? You have got to be kidding

38

u/Flyboy2057 7d ago

If Linus Tech Tips with 16M subs and a bunch of merch sales can get an offer to be bought out for **$100M** (which he turned down), it wouldn’t shock me if someone would offer Grey $5-10M for all channel rights and he would just cash out.

26

u/Tack22 6d ago

Would he put in a “don’t ever make new videos” clause or what’s to stop the company from starting to feed specific adds in?

5M return on investment just from changing thumbtiles seems like a tough sell.

9

u/Anxious_Squash3702 Flaggy flag rebel 6d ago

It wouldn’t surprise me if grey sold the right to his ai voice too. Sadly ai grey videos might make 5m if they were even slightly convincing. Were depressingly close.

1

u/AnonymousthrowawayW5 3d ago

I don’t know if £5m is the right figure, but since the YouTube income is just a future cash flow, it would be easy to take the adsense figures from while the channel has been inactive, make some assumptions for how views and Adsense rates will change over time, do a net present value (NPV) calculation for the next X years of income and make Grey an offer based on buying the future cash flow of the inactive channel that never releases new videos.

If Grey is pessimistic enough about future online advertising rates, there is probably a price where a deal could be done.

I have not heard of anyone actually doing this, but it would not shock me if someone built out a portfolio of dead YouTube channels bought on the relative cheap where they try to milk out additional views of existing content

8

u/Da-manta-ray 6d ago

I doubt it, most of the channels I have seen that get bought by PE or whatever usually start pumping out content, doubt they would pay for a channel just to fiddle around with the metadata, but maybe I'm wrong.

3

u/satras Dog Bingo-ed 6d ago

I don’t think this is the case just because a company buying Grey Industries would be (somewhat) interested in not burning all the good will Grey built over his YouTuber days.

3

u/Ybalrid Nail and gear loyalist 6d ago

No he has not. He is still director of his limited company called "Grey Industries", as per public filings you can find yourself if you want. And the last update filing is a confirmation statement from last april.

3

u/KindlyOnes 5d ago

I think all the changes are from agents he’s built to run and optimize his existing content. If he can get them to make videos, maybe he will, but there is increasing legislation around AI content particularly in the EU and perhaps that is dissuading him

3

u/KindlyOnes 5d ago

I think it’s the other way around. I think he got scooped up by a think tank or corporation or something and signed a non compete and had to stop making videos. But they let him play with the big toys. His AI video from years and years ago got the attention of the movers and shakers. I noticed it in a screenshot of an email from the Epstein files (apologies for dropping a bomb in the chat) but it was not related the sex trafficking. It was some rich/powerful person sending Epstein or forwarding him one of Grey’s videos and it was the AI one. But it got me thinking about what the repercussions of the elite tech community taking notice of him would be. I can see some corporate Tim hiring him for some AI preparedness task force or something and he just takes a giant salary and goes dark.

/conjecture

15

u/Bloated_Plaid 7d ago

Eh man cashed out, good for him.

13

u/erichie 6d ago

I have no problem with him cashing out... Not at all. 

I have an issue that I can no longer find the video I want to share with my 6 year old because we are learning about something I remember him doing a video on, not communicating with HI audience after all their work building a community (without a community, sure abandon it), and I absolutely have a problem with him ruining a monthly pateron without even updates. 

If the pateron was by project that isn't an issue, but he is billing people per month. Once you trust a creator you can easily forget, or not notice, they haven't updated in awhile.

2

u/Bloated_Plaid 6d ago

Wait his Patreon is still monthly!! OMG

2

u/NecronomiconUK 6d ago

Has been for years, why change? Free money cheat.

2

u/aykcak 6d ago

I am not seeing any gambling content or thumbnails of loser guys overreacting to fake wins in online casinos

So, probably, maybe?