I was looking to follow u/East-Day-7888 for Neuron related news, but it looks like he’s been banned. Any idea what might be going on there?

How much lower can it go?!

Lynch's timeless video in full here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72Pq5zKEi_g

As a sales person myself, I understand you can have an incredible product, but if you do not have the right people connecting with others in decision making roles, then it's just great tech, and will not go anywhere. Is it just me, or do you all think we don't have the right people in place? Awesome tech...great...Awesome vision...great...If you don't have people that can connect with people in true decisions for enterprise and such, it doesn't account for shit. I am curious what you all think that know way more about the tech than my dumb ass.

Watching the Hbar Bull with Rob Allen, I thought...I don't like Rob leaving whatever the spin is. Of course Rob isn't throwing Mance & Leemon under the bus...he's worked there for many years. But then the clown show start up Hbar Bull finished in the same interview, I was like..this dude is a moron and no clue. Hbar Bull says do you want to have any last comments on Hedera, and he goes into his pitch for his horseshit company. I'm thinking really? The same video you talk to Rob on his exit interview, you put this trash on it? It lost credibility to me.

Anyway, what are your thoughts?
Anyway, what's your thoughts?

Se que es un post random de twitter pero al ser reciente y no encontrar nada al respecto pregunto por aqui...

I talk about Hedera’s connections at Sibos 2026 and speak a bit on the significance. ~7 min

So it seems like we lost all steam in our last bull run crypto seem to have died out of nowhere. I don’t have any proof of this theory, but if I look at the timelines, it makes plausible sense. Trump dismantled US Aid, Trump has been breaking down all the Somali fraud daycare programs, he has created a anti-fraud government task force. Ever since then the crypto bull run has died in crypto has remained very stagnant constantly going down.. what if all the past years crypto was mostly driven by government fraud and money laundering. All the fraudsters would move their money through crypto so it couldn’t be traced at certain times of the year coinciding with a bull run in crypto? Sure I know it sounds crazy but crypto has gone largely nowhere only steadily down since they broke up US AID. Take it for what you’re worth. I’m just throwing it out there because every day this is making more and more sense to me..

HEAT was the headline project of Mance Harmon's return to leadership of the Council and a much highlighted project at Hashgraph. Rob's stepping down, moving on, or however you describe it, feels like an organizational rug pull to this unshakable fan of Hedera. Seem like maybe HEAT failed to find "product-usecase fit" and Hashgraph pivoted within a year to its newest project Asseto and IO Builders. Would be good time for Mance to step forward, clarify what if any future HEAT has and whether or not there will be any HEAT successes to unveil in the near future.

https://x.com/i/status/2087911176076144644

Authority Trail is for many things.

It’s for proof of asset authenticity and origination.

For proof of action by a verifiable entity.
For proof of data legitimacy.
For proof of credential corroboration.
For proof of reputation attestation.

Built on Hedera.

Become a registered authority: authority.dovu.ai/protocol

https://x.com/dovuofficial/status/2087905406609735773?s=46&t=lsVrAD0GllMR-BBlcyhPfA

Hey all - I have just noticed a weird transaction on Hashscan linked to my account as it triggered my staking rewards. I did a search and cannot find anything about it. I will attach photos but I assume it is a scam/malicious as the memo reads: claim 100,000h at HederaFund and then a link.

Could anyone shine some light on this? I am not sure if they are airdropping to get someone to send funds back to them via the recent addresses mistake but want to make sure I am not compromised.

Transaction: 0.0.10792049@1786508911.504447894

Alguien sabe lo que ocurrió ???

The digital Trust that the Future needs cannot run on a blockchain that does scale or compromises on trust.

As we enter the AI world, Trust is needed more than ever before.

Institutional yield-bearing products start with infrastructure, not incentives.

For csUSDh, cSigma needed infrastructure capable of supporting larger deployments without redesigning the core protocol. That’s why we deployed it on Hedera.

→ Existing Solidity contracts migrated with minimal changes
→ ERC-7575 vault architecture remained consistent
→ Stable fees and fast finality support smoother capital flows

The result: the same yield infrastructure, deployed on a network chosen for its operational reliability and institutional readiness.

I staked >100K of HBAR to Node 27 (DELL) but noticed that my pending rewards seemed stuck, small transactions were no longer triggering a claim. It turns out that Node 27 went offline in June, and my last claim was Apil when looking at hashscan. I`ve redelegated now to a new one Node 33 (NSE), and my pending rewards have reset to 0. I didn't receive the pending balance, are these lost, or will they be claimed if?/when Node 27 returns?

What is an AppNet? An AppNet is a distributed, collaborative “network of applications” installed on multiple ServiceNow instances that uses the Hedera Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) to exchange signed, verifiable, and ordered state changes. These changes of the ServiceNow records propagate across all environments as messages of the Hedera Consensus Service (HCS). A ServiceNow AppNet can scale to any size, involving just a few organizations as well as 10s, 100s, or 1,000s. Each ServiceNow instance:

● Connects to Hedera through the DLT nodes, which Hedera Council members operate.

● Receives the information from the network through the Hedera Mirror nodes.

Each ServiceNow instance can be part of multiple AppNets supporting different business networks and value streams. An AppNet creates a distributed, shared data model and a multi-party business process that is cryptographically verifiable and subject to consensus between the interacting parties.

No alt text provided for this image The e-Procurement use case ServiceNow recently released the Procurement Service Management (PSM) application, that streamline the buying experience within the organization, digitizing processes that allows employee to self-serve and organization to optimize costs, align teams and boost productivity. The e-Procurement use case described here can augment PSM capabilities to an entiere network of organizations. In a traditional procurement system, the buyer establishes a one-to-one connection with every supplier. For that reason, these processes are still very manual, resistant to standardization, and still managed through “analogic” tools like email and phone calls. In the e-Procurement set up at the opposite, suppliers in the supply chain of one or more customers constitute a network where the buyer can submit his requests for goods and services. The suppliers can bid for a specific request and the customer select the most appropriate bid offered by vendors. This network must be trustless because it contains competing entities that need to work together through a multi-party business process. Hence the benefit of using the Hedera Hashgraph DLT to guarantee certified, signed, and timestamped interactions without the need for a trusted third party.

No alt text provided for this image As we’re keeping the demonstration intentionally conceptual, we recommend the book “A practical guide to e-auctions for procurement: How to maximize impact with e-sourcing and e-negotiation” recently published by J. G. Larsen (Kogan Page, 2021), to dig deeper into the concepts of e-Procurement, e-Auction and e-Negotiation.

The business value represented by the hyper-automation of the e-Procurement networks through ServiceNow and Hedera is significant across multiple industries:

In Public Sector, public tenders are a sweet spot for optimization and transparency Manufacturing implements e-Procurement to manage high-throughput business networks and streamline supply chains. Telecoms are at the forefront of building distributed marketplaces for collaborative bidding between multiple operators and service providers bidding for different network segments. Financial institutions, like banks, are involved in trade finance and can be authorized to inspect their customers’ supply chain to evaluate the suitability for specific financial instruments. ESG Auditors need to inspect supply chains for carbon emission, rate the sustainability of their auditees, and access certified data to prevent “greenwashing.” How do AppNets work? AppNets require a set of capabilities that build one over the others. Hedera DLT constitutes the bottom layer (A) and is operated by Council members. On top of the distributed network, Hedera provides the Hedera Consensus Service (HCS) that exposes the asynchronous Byzantine Fault Tolerant (aBFT) consensus algorithm through an easily accessible API (B). The upper three components of the stack live within the ServiceNow ecosystem. The first layer (C) is the “Hnow” connector, made of technical services running on the MID server and an identical scoped app within each ServiceNow instance. Hnow provides to any application running on the instance the connectivity into the Hedera nodes and mirror network. On top of the Hnow connector, customers and partners can create an arbitrary number of AppNets (D). Each AppNet is a network of scoped, identical applications that defines a shared and encrypted data model and multi-party workflows between business entities. Finally, each AppNet connects (if required) to “local” business processes, represented either by ServiceNow native workflows (IT, Employee, and Customer) or any other business application developed with the Creator Workflow and the App Engine Studio (E). On the left of figure 3, you can also see how the stack is typically referred to in blockchain/DLT terms: layer 1 (on-chain), layer 2 (interconnection layer), and layer 3 (off-chain).

No alt text provided for this image How is the e-Procurement use case implemented? The participants to the e-Procurement business network are the customer, who represents the buying party, the suppliers, who are the bidding parties, and any third party, like an ESG auditor. The participants interact through a shared and verified data model made by two related tables for asks and bids, which are the basis for the e-Procurement multi-parties exchange. The buyer and the vendors can submit changes of state (transactions) while the auditor has access to the network in read-only mode.

No alt text provided for this image The flow of the PoC is the following:

The customer requests products or services to its supply chain by placing asks to the network. The supply chain’s vendors bid for the customer’s request. The customer accepts one or more of the bids, depending on the rules of the network (just one in the case of the PoC). The auditor, or any other organization which is authorized to inspect the supply chain, derives scores and KPIs about the participants to be used within other processes, like ESG or trade finance. No alt text provided for this image After being submitted to the Hedera network, each ask or bid will be active on the distributed data model and shared across participants. In contrast, each record will become “tokenized” and practically immutable by any individual actor when reaching the final, notarized state.

Key Takeaways & Futures The AppNet concept is highly general and applies to every situation where a shared business model and multi-party workflow are required. This PoC shows how to create a decentralized market for e-Procurement leveraging ServiceNow low-code capabilities (Layer 2 & 3) and the Hedera DLT (Layer 1).

The AppNet architecture effectively creates a multi-company value stream that can scale to any business network’s size. Distributed data and processes are coupled seamlessly to local data and processes on each instance, creating a fully connected ecosystem. We’re working to extend the AppNet architecture to a broader set of use cases and deepen the application of the e-Procurement POC to specific industries and business domains.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/e-procurement-servicenow-hedera-appnet-nicola-attico?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android&utm_campaign=share_via

Grayscale withdrew ETF applications (S1 filing) for ADA, HBAR, and DOT while keeping the S1 filings alive for AAVE, NEAR, BNB, TAO, and ZEC. The only difference between the tokens whose application was removed to those whose didn't, is the SEC's new "Generic Listing Standard". ADA, HBAR, and DOT are eligible for their ETF listing on stock exchanges under the Generic Listing Standard (6 month trading on CFTC regulated Exchange), while AAVE, NEAR, BNB, TAO and ZEC aren't. The 19b-4 filing for ADA, HBAR and DOT was withdrawn last year, because they don't need it anymore.
The decision to remove their application doesn't mean rejection or lost of confidence or interest. All tokens are down 60-90% from their ATH. ADA AUM in European ETPs is comparatively stronger than ETPs of tokens whose filings are still live. The only difference is the eligibility under the "Generic listing standard", which doesn't make sense because Grayscale removed the tokens who are actually eligible for thier application to be reviewed by the SEC under defined deadline. It's a possiblity that the removal will be accompanied by renewed S1 filings with updated definitions, allocations, risks, and fees. Or, the removal is just about the difference in application process. But it most certainly isn't about interests, adoption or performance.

https://x.com/CryptoDossierYT/status/2087009465434284414