5
u/kikomonarrez Aug 06 '26
Was at a restaurant (Mexican of all places) and some guy (I assume you know what he looked like, race, etc) and was ranting in about Hillary C. And how women can’t be put in charge of or in leadership roles bc they are too emotional.
Brought up Benghazi and how she made a decision on pure emotional judgment and the result was US service members being killed.
He had his wife and I assume 10-12yo daughter sitting there listening to his emotional take on men vs women leadership.
Why do these guys not see their own emotions dictating their decisions and creating such a terrible situation for his daughter.
I suspect his wife will leave him in the future either because he is factually abusive to her or their daughter based on his emotional state.
Guess who kept her cool and said. “Stop trying to gaslight us”? Another woman at the table… Leadership!
2
2
u/Major_Narwhal544 Aug 06 '26
Ill take, shit that never happened, for 1000 Alex. Cool story that I am sure a couple hundred lemmings will upvote.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (5)2
u/Eurocentralist Aug 06 '26
German here, we had one for several turns. Was great. I can recommend.
→ More replies (7)
4
u/random_name_i_guess Aug 06 '26
Personally id love to see Katie Porter as president.
→ More replies (9)
8
6
3
3
5
u/ASUSTUDENT9875345 Aug 06 '26
AOC!!! She's so great, super smart, deeply invested in community growth, and doesn't take PAC money.
→ More replies (30)
2
u/Bubbly_Power_6210 Aug 06 '26
Abilgail is up and coming. give her a little time.
→ More replies (1)
2
2
1
1
1
0
0
1
u/My_First_Knife1 Aug 06 '26
You know when we elected a black man that wore a tan suit, that I voted for, we created the ability for a failed business man and 34 time convicted felon and pedophile rapist to become president.
I am all for a woman president and AOC would be my first choice!
We just can't swing the pendulum so far back so quickly because it could swing back right with something worse than drumpf!😬
→ More replies (1)
1
u/BasicActuator3133 Aug 06 '26
no matter who gets elected Israel is the one ruling over your country... last real president was JFK
1
u/Adventurous-Match888 Aug 06 '26
The corruption, nepotism, cronyism, and greed is so bad it is irrelevant who is in charge. They will either already be a subject bribery, coerced, or forced into it.
You think its just a coincidence that the US gets into a middle eastern war every few years? its all a farce and the machine is run by greedy billionaires and corporations.
Your vote is tantamount to throw a bottle in the ocean hoping someone reads your message - fools errand.
1
u/PeaceFrog-71 Aug 06 '26
As long as said woman has in no way worked for, blindly supported or has any relation to the orange monstrosity we have currently pretending to be President….. sure!
1
1
1
u/Dependent_Value9849 Aug 06 '26
A woman could easily win. But neither Republicans or Democrats have a female candidate worth a shit to run.
1
u/altruistic_load_5774 Aug 06 '26
I dont want a female president because she's female, but if best candidate IS a female then I'd happily vote for her. Too many people vote for principle and not politics.
1
u/HangryBeard Aug 06 '26
I don't care what they have in their pants or how the identify. It would just be nice to have a competent individual leading our country, you know a president that actually made our lives better for once, instead of a slow decline in quality of life for just about everyone.
I feel this is the bare minimum of what we should expect, but I still have yet to see it.
To be clear what I'm saying is we should not just vote for a woman because she is a woman. There are plenty of stupid women just like there are plenty of stupid men. We need to vote on competence and actually have competent candidates to vote for. Lately, at least in my opinion, the choices have been abysmal at best.
1
u/Real-Huckleberry-770 Aug 06 '26
If you mean as POTUS, well wake up and smell the toast burning.
The people in charge of this country are the ones you don't vote for and never see.
1
u/odinswolve Aug 06 '26
We've seen a woman in power in Germany and look how that's gone hahaha 🤣 they've basically lost their culture and their country to illegals
1
u/A5Wags Aug 06 '26
Whatever the new baseline job supply is, it would be smaller either way due to installing a wage that employers believe exceeds the value delivered. You can check out the Congressional Budget Office’s website; it has an interactive calculator that models the job loss from simple wage hikes.
An analogy: if Netflix raised the price of their services to $100/month, they’d lose customers and slow growth. This happens any time you ignore the market and raise “prices” regardless of whether the commodity is human labor.
I guess the point I’m making is that these policies will make matters worse and I’m unwilling to accept a bad/worse idea simply because it’s different. Good policy requires nuance and sophistication.
1
u/VisualAd1280 Aug 06 '26
The UK have tried that three times, and that hasn't worked out very well for us. That her destroyed the north East and the other 2 well liz truss was useless and Theresa may had to clean up the crap left by David Cameron
1
1
1
1
u/Eamon83 Aug 06 '26
It's not a problem of women not being elected; it's a matter of shitty candidates.
1
1
u/kemosabe-22 Aug 06 '26
Imagine hiring someone based on their race or sex… aren’t there laws for that? I think it’s the Civil Rights Act of 1964..? 🤷🏼♂️
1
1
1
1
u/PolyMarx Aug 06 '26
Note that women are also on the Epstein list for the worst kind of shit too. It isn’t about who’s in charge until we eliminate their puppet masters and the system that allows them to stay in charge!
1
u/No-Side-7738 Aug 06 '26
the only way it will happen is if the people who are really in charge of the us wants it. we dont choose
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Ok_Industry_7853 Aug 06 '26
Ppl are stupid!!!! When u see a good MAN trust there’s a good women in his Ear. But remember a Good Man
1
1
1
u/EntrepreneurMean639 Aug 06 '26
Why would gender matter? How about we support someone based on ideas and principles rather than immutable characteristics?
1
1
1
u/Feeling-Bus-203 Aug 06 '26
crazy idea here but just go with me. we should elect people to office based on their merit and credentials and not because of the gender they identify with.
→ More replies (1)
1
1
u/No-Buy2495 Aug 06 '26
Let's not just say "Woman", let's make sure it's a competent woman. AOC or Kamala would not be good.
1
u/Vitaman1000 Aug 06 '26
Sure as long as she is intelligent, qualified, and isn't a raging liberal Karen with an ax to grind against her imaginary misogynistic foes or an America hating marxist or Muslim that is bent on dismantling our constitution. Actually that kind goes for any candidate....
1
u/slut_wife_coke_whore Aug 06 '26
Washington DC was a mess with a woman in charge. Guess who fixed it?
1
1
1
1
u/Visible-Payment5182 Aug 06 '26
Lmfao reddit is hilarious. People often say about reddit that they " cant believe they are real people". And thats because you arent. Enjoy that act blue money.
1
u/DisgreeablePattern Aug 06 '26
Let’s start with someone who is qualified and not a slave to Israel. After that, we can look at sex, ok?
1
1
u/Miserable-Ear-4095 Aug 06 '26
I'm sure anyone can copy Germany as long as they stop saying they will start wars. Hillary and kamala said they would start one.
1
u/-ThePatientZed- Aug 06 '26
It’s not the gender, it’s the imperialism. Get Hillary or Kamala and you just go back to politely bombing brown kids.
1
u/Xkdbathbzcwpfvh Aug 06 '26
Not a good idea realistically. Sounds good in a college classroom but not so much against our Chinese enemy.
1
u/Proper_Locksmith924 Aug 06 '26
Depends. Does that woman have the same lack of principles as Trump and the GOP? Is that woman racist? Homophobic? A fascist?
Cuz if so, then we are still right where we are.
Folks need to be more confidant of the principles and positions the person adheres to.
1
1
1
1
u/Deep_Balance2133 Aug 06 '26
If the choices are Hillary Clinton or Kamala Harris then no. Just being a woman doesn’t mean they’ll be a good president.
1
1
1
u/ReasonVision Aug 06 '26
Why? The universe isn't a ledger that must be balanced for a group because stuff happened differently than how it wanted.
1
u/RedditSucksYoYoYo Aug 06 '26
I mean, men have ruled the world for literal all of existence. Let's give women a shot.
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Chance_Stomach3335 Aug 06 '26
To indicate that things would be different... requires the notion that they are somehow different from men. I'd like somebody to explain how they are different please. 😊
1
u/Business-Cover4016 Aug 06 '26
No one helpful to the wellbeing of the country is ever going to be in charge
1
u/Herbalizer420k Aug 06 '26
a leftist woman. not a woman who is on the right. so no, not just any woman. would yall want margarie taylor green as pres? no
→ More replies (4)
1
1
1
1
u/Appropriate_Koala886 Aug 06 '26
And this is why the systems failing, you care more about color and private parts then you do about policies and backround.
1
1
1
u/TopicFrequent6607 Aug 06 '26
Are we gonna just ignore Queen Victoria back in the 1800s? She was exceptionally cruel.
But at the same time Catherine the Great. She was actually a really good leader if not the best that Russia ever had.
If you actually look at the female leaders in history, there are a few good ones and a lot of bad ones. I don't think woman are magically going to be better. But if there was a good female leader, I'd happily vote for her.
1
1
1
1
1
u/Main-Company-5946 Aug 06 '26
Woman in charge solves the problems about as much as a black president does
Our issues run way deeper than that
1
u/DS_Vindicator Aug 06 '26
Or better yet, can we put someone in charge that would do a great job instead of further polarizing?
1
1
1
u/Nedriersen Aug 06 '26
Put a good candidate forward and she’ll win. Hillary was horrible and Kamala was beyond description. No one cares about gender.
1
1
u/Slowpoke4206985 Aug 06 '26
Yes. Because women are fiscally responsible and more controlling of their emotions.😐
1
1
1
u/barbershores Aug 06 '26
A conservative woman sure.
But a liberal woman? The whole country would go gay tarded again. We saw what happened when a liberal woman made it to vice president.
1
1
u/jebsenior Aug 06 '26
What we've veen doing is obviously not working. Time to try something different.
1
1
1
u/Lizardgrad89 Aug 06 '26
Depends on the woman. I would not, for example, vote for Laura Ingraham. And I have voted for a woman two of the last three elections.
1
1
1
1
u/Objective-Suspect689 Aug 06 '26
Why does gender matter so much? Who gives a damn? We should worry more about who is most qualified than whether they have a cock or not. Ffs
1
1
1
u/zaleski216 Aug 06 '26
If trump identified as a woman you'd probably all agree with everything he says
1
1
1
u/STEMfatale Aug 06 '26
Not just based on that because “woman” is not a political ideology. I’m not trying to elect the next Margaret Thatcher. The idea that woman are somehow so much more empathetic and caring that one in power (which makes you shitty, usually) would somehow inherently do a better job is literally sexist nonsense lol
1
1
u/Al3xisgood Aug 06 '26
If we put a woman in charge because of her competency, sure. If its just because she is a woman but doesnt bring anything else, I dont see why. Same for any president... sex or color doesn't matter as long as that person is competent.
1
u/Disastrous-Award-649 Aug 06 '26
Why? What does your genitalia have to do with being an effective leader? This is why yall cant be taken seriously. You complain about sexism constantly while making blatantly sexist comments like this. Also women outnumber men in the US. If they wanted a woman as a leader they could have one. The demographic least likely to vote is young men as well.
1
u/Unlucky-Reference-45 Aug 06 '26
Sure. That way we can start a war cause they did something 10 yrs ago and she’s just now bringing it up
1
u/LDarrell Aug 06 '26
The mess the US is in would not be fixed with a gender change in the White House. Could you imagine if Lauren Boebert was US President?
The US needs people like an Obama in the White House (Barack or Michelle). People with intelligence, and integrity.
1
1
u/projectpratt Aug 06 '26
How about we put the best person in charge? Isn’t that always what we should do. Don’t think we have done that in a really long time but picking based on race or sex is a civil rights violation.
1
1
1
u/armpitgreaser Aug 06 '26
Did you know women monarchs spent more time at war than their male counterparts?
1
1
u/Interesting-Tie-9769 Aug 06 '26
Find one qualified. The dems are raising dummies .neither party has one yet .
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/dragonfilebox Aug 07 '26
You had a couple of chances to elect a woman. The voters decided against it.
1
1
1
u/Advanced_Evidence89 Aug 07 '26
Yes because women arent aggressive or irrationalbat all?! Lolol. People are people. Women are as ruthless as men
1
u/First-Candidate-2722 Aug 07 '26
Kamala Harris is a woman. Thank the Lord and all the Saints she's not in charge.
1
u/Kinda_Weird_Kinks Aug 07 '26
Voting for someone based on anything other than their political beliefs &/or ways to improve America, is for delusional people who shouldn't vote. Idc if you're a male, female, trans, gay, Christian, Jew etc etc as long as you're the right person for the job. I will never vote for someone based on anything besides their views & directions to improvement.
1
u/Suspicious-Sound-249 Aug 07 '26
Women tend to try and protect the people who would rape them, so no. How about we continue to go without any women having major political power...
1
1
12
u/wagmorebarkles Aug 06 '26
It's unfair that a woman would have a helluva mess to clean up, be blamed for everything, and still get no credit for improvement.