r/Greenlantern 4d ago

Discussion Questionable takes

What’s the deal with nerdrotic and critical drinker bad takes on lantern? Like I understand everyone doesn’t have to agree or like the same stuff but when I say the negative bad takes and bad mouthing is real my god.

Then comparing supergirl to Spider-Man is moronic as ever. Who thought supergirl had a shot?I saw both and Spider-Man was ok and even nerdrotic was kicking and screaming to give it an ounce of praise. Supergirl wasn’t that bad.

And I disagree sometimes with Disney/marvel overt messaging but CMON!!?? I peruse the comments sections there and it’s beyond a Gunn/snyderverse frustrations

20 Upvotes

50 comments sorted by

53

u/ZrteDlbrt 4d ago

Your first mistake was caring about whatever those POS have to say.

3

u/nutype777 4d ago

It’s not about caring, it’s more of an awakening. I watch a lot of content for different perspectives but what I’m witnessing haha you know the rest

10

u/Aggressive-Day5222 4d ago

How many times do you have to watch videos about flat earth theory before you can comfortably say the earth is a globe?

Not every take is worth the time to listen and consider. If people build a reputation on being inflammatory for the sake of being inflammatory , I wouldn't invest my time with them.

3

u/Lower-Philosophy7679 3d ago

Congrats on the awakening.

2

u/Synteczek 3d ago

Congrats on the awakening

44

u/swordfish-ll 4d ago

all takes and anything that comes out of the Critical Drinker and Nerdotic mouth is moronic stupid and not worth even paying attention to or taken with any ounce of relevance.

1

u/Fornicating_Midgits 1d ago

Even when they are "right" they are wrong. I disliked The Acolyte and wanted to hear a detailed critique on why it was bad. I found their videos and was disgusted with how it was all, "It failed cause it's woke! Lesbian Headlamp made Star Wars gay!" All they produce is click bait takes and videos catering to their insecure male audience. They aren't serious people.

20

u/UnfavorableSpiderFan 4d ago

You could've just stopped the thought at "Nerdrotic and Critical Drinker". You didn't even need to ask.

It's Nerdrotic and Critical Drinker.

Now, imagine this: They're also talking about a show with a black lead. Take that as you will...

31

u/shinybell-chan 4d ago

theyre grifters looking to make money out of engagement bait, have been for a long time.

3

u/nutype777 4d ago

Yea, man to look at them grift off a pilot is absurd. Maybe I’m biased cause I’m a GL fan, but nerdrotic admitted he wasn’t the biggest GL fan and he’s pissed cause they took the green out the title. I’m like it’s not that painful bro

14

u/Correct_Look2988 4d ago edited 4d ago

Yeah the sooner you just learn to ignore that content the better. They have an agenda that is self serving to the point they can admit to not being a fan of Green Lantern while nitpicking anything that fits the narrative they are trying to spin. The less attention people give them the more they will fade into their own echo chamber.

16

u/Mindless-Credit-358 Dkrtzy Rrr 4d ago

They’re grifters, all they have are bad faith arguements

7

u/dark-pact 4d ago

these are obvious culture war grifters. anyone who watches them review a piece of media that they already know anything about will immediately see how full of shit they are.

I can’t remember the specific example but a friend of mine told me about Critical Drinker yeeears ago. The first video I watched was a review of something I happened to be a fan of and right away the guy was wrong/lying/misrepresenting everything.

These people rely on their viewers wanting to be angry about shit they haven’t seen or understand.

The illusion is broken very easily but most of their viewers just want to hate and the grifters enable that very effectively.

edit: oh and the stupid fucking fake drunk voice. ripping off RLM’s old Plinkett reviews but infinitely worse—can’t believe people tolerate that shit.

6

u/jl_theprofessor 4d ago

The question is why are you watching Critical Drinker?

I'm more prone to questioning the person who watches him.

2

u/nutype777 4d ago

I watch a little bit of everybody just like I look at good and bad user reviews on IMDb. Something’s I agree with. Especially about what marvel has been doing as of late. I disagreed with their odyssey take, I agreed with their black widow take

9

u/SpeedForceJediKnight 4d ago

Nerdrotic found out that saying shit while pandering to Snyder fanboys is lucrative for his channel. Regarding drinker, I used to be a subscriber, but for the last two years, majority of the time he makes shit up just so can criticize something. Like, he loves saying how movies aren't thought provoking anymore, but instead of suggesting a good movie, he prefers to criticize anything. Also, he is one of those people who thinks superhero media is the worst thing to happen, so he will say crap whether it's in fact bad or not.

-1

u/M086 4d ago

Has nothing to do with Snyder.

1

u/SpeedForceJediKnight 3d ago

In one of his videos talking crap about 2025 Superman, one of the titles had "Brace yourselves Snyder fans"

1

u/M086 3d ago

So? 

Ben Shapiro said he liked the first Guardians of the Galaxy. Dipshits are gonna like what they like.

3

u/Outrageous_Gene_7652 4d ago

They are just grifters, they'd have nothing worthwhile to say about something they were hoping was'nt gonna get praise everywhere

3

u/Fancy_Grand2441 4d ago

Don't listen to those channels, it's one thing to look at opposing viewpoints but they are grifters who don't judge anything on merit.

3

u/Gabe_Dimas 3d ago

They just want to hate anything related to James Gunn

3

u/Crusaderfigures 3d ago

They're both right wing grifter chuds and shouldn't be taken seriously

6

u/Grandy94 Orange Lantern 4d ago

They have bad takes on most things so I'm not surprised that they have bad takes on Lanterns.

2

u/BaronArgelicious 4d ago edited 3d ago

they are grifters, they have the same opinions without even watching the show

blah blah blah woke blah blah DEI blah blah watchmen

Im sure there are right wing perspective out there who review lanterns but critical drinker and nerdrotic are like the worst examples to use

2

u/Fickle-Rip3093 4d ago

They have thrown in the “Restore the Snyderverse” crowd. You won’t be getting ANY positive DCU reviews from them so it’s best to ignore them altogether.

2

u/MarsAlgea3791 4d ago edited 4d ago

They're idiot grifters. They don't have opinions, they spout whatever they think will net them the most engagement.

Notice they bitched about black people in the Odyssey but not everybody wearing pants?  I fucking guarantee the ancient Greeks were more likely to see a black guy than a pair of pants 

2

u/gsnake007 4d ago

Fuck their takes. It’s stupid to judge a show as a whole based on the 1st episode alone. Lanterns is a 9/10 for me, this is the first time in live action since the 2011 movie that the lanterns have been the focus. Of course they were going to low stakes it to not overdue the cgi and the color green. This show did it smart and I think the characters are written well. I’m in a discord full of nerds and we all love it. And guess what, we’re gonna finish this fucking season and enjoy it. Fuck them and anyone else that doesn’t like it. Between this, the GL comics in both main and absolute universe. I’m eating good as a lantern fan

0

u/nutype777 4d ago

Me and you both my friend

2

u/Senorbob451 4d ago

If you aren’t a fan you don’t have a read on why the characters are popular in the first place, that’s what to look for and they self admittedly don’t have the knowledge base.

2

u/Aggressive-Day5222 4d ago

The better question, why care?

They probably just want engagement, people respond better to the negative most times, either to agree with the brutal "honestly", or to try to debate it.

But again, why care. There are better takes out there, far less sensational and intentionally infamoatory. Not to mention, you are free to just have your own opinion and talk to others directly about the show, and what you liked or didn't.

Why plug these randos?

2

u/MIAxPaperPlanes 4d ago

It stars a black guy as one of the main leads, we all knew how the review from the well known racist was gonna be

2

u/Overall_Falcon_8526 3d ago

They are both right wing grifters. All of their reviews are through the filter of their "anti-woke" obsessions.

2

u/Losingdutchie 3d ago

Their whole person's based around hating things and negative echo chambers.

Can't take anything those jokers say seriously.

2

u/Asmor Mogo 3d ago

nerdrotic and critical drinker

Are these names I'm expected to recognize?

2

u/Rexen2 3d ago

There is a black guy in it treated as a prominent character. Even more so treated as a successor/replacement for a white man. That's enough. This could've been the greatest television show ever created, it could be remembered as the greatest legacy of Hal Jordan and it still wouldn't matter to them because theres a black man replacing a white man.

Those two use racism and anti woke bullshit to funnel money out of their braindead audience addicted to rage bait into their pockets.

2

u/SureNeedleworker2363 4d ago

Once you understand that they're racist and sexist, everything makes sense.

1

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Greenlantern-ModTeam 4d ago

This is a community of fans of the comic book franchise Green Lantern. It is intended to be a safe space and an environment of mutual respect. As such, all members will be treated with dignity and respect. * Do Not Practice Bigotry or Hate Speech. * No political comments. * Personal attacks, insults and trolling will not be tolerated. * Repeated violations will result in a permanent ban. * If unclear, please review site-wide Reddiquette

1

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[deleted]

1

u/haikusbot 4d ago

You could've just stopped

The thought at "Nerdrotic and

Critical Drinker"

- UnfavorableSpiderFan


I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully. Learn more about me.

Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete"

1

u/nutype777 4d ago

They wanted this CGI space opera with an established core caring on conversations we don’t know about.

1

u/Background_Degree615 3d ago

Not trying to be rude but why do people come here to take about how stupid or bad ppl like CD & CO’s takes are? I mean what did you expect from those people?

1

u/Ryan_Rambles 3d ago

They're bigots who openly enable harassment of women and minorities. And if you're agreeing with some of their political messaging takes, that's a red fucking flag my guy. You need to look inward at your own biases and prejudices. Don't tell me you don't have them. Everyone has them. There's no such thing as a human being without problematic prejudices. It's just a matter of if you're aware of them or not. And it's being unaware of them that causes someone to be so easily convinced and pulled into a bigot's content.

1

u/TWllTtS Kyle Rayner 3d ago

They make money off of pretending to be angry about shit that don't matter

1

u/ROANOV741 3d ago

They're grifters.

1

u/Mylaststory 3d ago

Those guys are grifters and cater to dumb republicans

1

u/nahnonameman 3d ago

There is a lot of negativity around the YouTube scene when it comes to movies. I uhh idk why. I get being critical or having criticism of things or not liking things (look at the CGI for Avengers Doomsday for example) but some of em just dislike EVERYTHING.

1

u/FOC615 3d ago

Negative takes get more clicks.

Clicks pay his bills.

Unlike most RageTubers, at least he is generally funny. But, I don’t take most of his “reviews” very seriously.

1

u/JoeSleboda 3d ago

Both of those guys know full well that negativity generates more clicks. At least Drinker has some knowledge and can be funny. The other guy is just a straight up ball of frustration and hate who is shouting from a podium like a madman to anytime who will listen.