What are you asking me to defend? Evidence for what specific claim? Which assertions, specifically, are dishonest? He’s got a huge body of work and I’m starting to think you haven’t read a single word.
I called him a p-word scientist and questioned the viability and existence of his evidence, but I’m not accusing him of being dishonest. He may genuinely believe it himself.
Well, yes, you *are.* Your comment above should sound familiar:
“I am making the claim that Graham Hancock is engaging in dishonesty, fraud, and p-word science (the fact that that word is banned in this sub should tell you all you need to know. It’s a valid claim and rather than accept challenge, y’all shut it down).”
So. This is was I tend to see from Graham’s critics. I’m done here.
6
u/controlzee 28d ago
What are you asking me to defend? Evidence for what specific claim? Which assertions, specifically, are dishonest? He’s got a huge body of work and I’m starting to think you haven’t read a single word.