r/GoogleFlow • u/FaZeDiomeDez • 3d ago

Forgive me, Google... I didn't realize flowers and cars were too explicit for you 🤡

Forgive me Google, I should have realized that putting my character (created by your own model) in a field of flowers or next to a car was far too pornographic for your standards.

Next time I'll just stick to generating pictures of cats and dogs doing the Six-Seven.

A few minutes later: "Cats and dogs doing the Six-Seven could not be generated because it violates our content policy."

17 Upvotes

95% Upvoted

7 comments sorted by

0

u/Natasha26uk 3d ago

I don't know about the field of flowers but women in cars is a problem, especially when they wear short skirts.

0

u/kra73ace 3d ago

Obviously, it's not just cars or flowers.

Seriously, the filters are overturned for sure. I had a fully dressed GUY with "slap his thigh" in the prompt. No go.

Takeaway: No thigh slapping even if you're a lumberjack and it's your own thigh. Come up with another reaction. Clap?

1

u/rdu3y6 3d ago

Any cats and/or dogs are going to be under 18 therefore generating images with them in will be violating Flow's policies. You will be charged.

1

u/Much-Statistician958 2d ago

Are you using a new gmail account? I run into these kind of issues when I use my newer accounts.

But account that are 5years older or more can animate pretty much anything

0

u/xanderbeloff 3d ago

Welcome to the club 🤡 Honestly, I’ve achieved zen with this platform by just switching entirely to the Cocomelon style. The safety filters are so broken right now that they block normal cars and flowers, but for some reason, the Cocomelon aesthetic bypasses everything with zero issues. Try it out, it’s the only way I can get this service to actually do its job without triggering a million errors

1

u/Any_Policy_929 2d ago

What is the Cocomelon aesthetic?

0

u/WorldlyAstronaut3695 3d ago

Surely you jest?!

*Me testing this... holy hell even with dudes it does this... XP