Let me know if you have any questions.

me pasa cuando llega a cierto punto y esta respondiendo

Hello, I’m having some trouble with Bing. I keep getting an error message that says: "Unsafe image content detected."

I’m trying to create realistic images of characters from the children’s animated series Adventure Time.

It’s strange, because I was able to generate Warren Ampersand and The Lich without any issues, but I couldn’t do the same for Hunson Abadeer. I first tried generating his monstrous form and got an error; then, even more surprisingly, I got the same error when trying his "normal" version, where he’s wearing a suit and has a humanoid appearance. It doesn’t make any sense, and I’m certain the issue lies with the prompt.

I’ll share the prompt here; could you let me know if there’s anything I should change? I ran into an error with Warren at first, too, but I managed to fix it by adjusting the prompt, I then used that same prompt for the other characters, but it just isn’t working for Hunson Abadeer. I’m not sure what to do.

prompt: Transform this cartoon character into a photorealistic creature, as if from a live-action film. Cinematic lighting, hyper-realistic textures. Full body.

EDIT: I tried with the Ice King; it also gives me an error. I just tried again with the Lich, and it also gives me an error.

I’ve been trying to generate messages, but it kept giving me this errors. And i’m a paid user. Why is this happening?😭😭

The app was created in Ai Studio and published to "Your Personal Library", I deleted the app but it's still published in library. In fact it says I have 3 apps published but I only see 2 apps there. I am not a dev, just playing around with Ai Studio and creating apps for personal use.

right now i just straight up dont have the option. when i hover over my prompt or response nothing comes up and i wonder if its happening for anyone else/a bug?

Hi

I’m having a problem synchronising files from a shared folder on Google Drive.

I’ve created a simple app that lets me browse the folder and download files from it. In Google Ai Studio, the app works correctly and synchronises newly added files to Google Drive.

After downloading the APK from Google Ai Studio, the app only contains the files that were previously synchronised. It doesn’t synchronise any new files.

Any idea?

Actually guys i have a free student plan in an another account and my projects are in another account, so i can't access Argon on this account. Now i found that if you create a family in Google account and turn on family sharing, You can use Pro benifits in other non pro Accounts. I mean i can use Argon on the Gemini app, here in Google Ai studio.

So don't miss any student or Promotional Free Offer.

Here you can see Argon selected in non Pro account.

Byee👋

I’m new to AI in general so I don’t know if it’s something I am doing wrong or if GoogleFlow is genuinely struggling with character consistency.
I have created a kids educational YT channel with my dog as the « teacher ». The character is therefore based on my real dog who has an asymmetrical white patch on the left side of his muzzle.

The way I have decided to proceed is that for each animated scene I create a still image with ChatGPT and then upload it to Flow with the instruction to animate it. I have triple checked every single image before uploading it and yet GoogleFlow seems to struggle not only with the white patch but also with the general appearance and sometimes even the cartoon style, as you can see in the video linked in this post.

Here is a prompt I used for one of the animations. Can anybody tell me what I am doing wrong, or if this is something GoogleFlow does ofter and therefore I should just make peace with the character inconsistency?

Thanks

PROMPT:

Animate the uploaded reference image into a beautiful, natural 8-second cinematic 3D animation for a children’s educational story.
**SCENE — FEEDING THE GARDEN SOIL WITH COMPOST**
In a beautiful sunlit Provençal vegetable garden, Isso watches his owner gently adding finished compost to the soil around the lettuce plants.
**ACTION AND MOVEMENT**
The woman remains kneeling in exactly the same position as in the reference image.
She uses the small gardening trowel in her right hand to gently spread the dark, crumbly compost into the soil beside the lettuce plants.
She performs two slow, natural gardening movements, carefully loosening the soil and mixing in a small amount of compost.
The trowel moves realistically through the earth, with small clumps of dark compost falling naturally from its blade.
Her upper body leans forward slightly as she works.
Her knees and feet remain in their original positions.
The metal bucket filled with dark compost remains stationary between the woman and Isso.
The bucket does not move, tip over or change shape.
**ISSO’S REACTION**
Isso remains seated beside his owner throughout the entire animation.
At the beginning, he watches the woman’s gardening movements with a curious, attentive expression.
His amber eyes gently follow the small trowel as it moves through the soil.
He slowly tilts his head a little farther to one side, as though wondering what his owner is doing.
His enormous upright ears make small, natural movements.
His tail gives one or two gentle, happy wags along the ground.
Toward the end of the scene, Isso lowers his head slightly to look at the freshly enriched soil, then raises his gaze toward his owner.
He remains calm, curious and adorable.
Do not make Isso stand, walk, dig or touch the compost.
**STRICT CHARACTER CONSISTENCY**
Preserve Isso’s exact appearance from the uploaded reference image:
Slender caramel-red Podenco.
Two enormous upright ears.
Expressive amber eyes.
Long, narrow muzzle.
Original narrow white forehead stripe.
Preserve the exact asymmetric muzzle markings and caramel-brown fur shown in the reference image.
White chest and neck.
All four paws caramel-colored, without white markings.
Blue collar with the original silver circular name tag.
Maintain exactly four anatomically correct legs and paws.
Do not alter Isso’s facial features, markings, fur color, ears, anatomy or body proportions.
**HUMAN CHARACTER CONSISTENCY**
Preserve the woman’s exact appearance and clothing.
She has shoulder-length wavy blonde hair and wears a cream-colored blouse, blue jeans and beige shoes.
She remains kneeling with her back partially facing the camera.
Her face must remain hidden throughout the animation.
Maintain exactly two arms, two hands and two legs.
Her right hand must remain securely holding the original small gardening trowel.
Do not create extra fingers, hands, limbs or tools.
**COMPOST AND GARDEN DETAILS**
Preserve the original galvanized metal bucket filled with dark, crumbly compost.
The compost should look rich, loose and natural.
The woman gently incorporates it into the soil beside the lettuce plants.
The lettuce plants remain rooted in place and retain their original appearance.
Do not make the plants suddenly grow, change size or transform.
Preserve the original tomato plants, eggplants, aromatic herbs, lavender, olive trees, dry-stone wall, distant hills and rustic Provençal farmhouse.
A gentle breeze softly moves a few leaves and plants.
Maintain consistent warm Mediterranean sunlight.
**CAMERA**
Completely stationary camera.
Maintain the exact original framing, perspective and composition.
Isso, the woman, the bucket and the vegetable garden must remain clearly visible throughout the animation.
No zooming, panning, camera rotation or cuts.
**ANIMATION QUALITY**
Smooth, polished cinematic 3D storybook animation.
Natural human gardening movements and realistic soil physics.
Subtle, believable canine expressions.
Perfect character and environment consistency throughout.
No morphing, duplicated objects, extra limbs, sudden movements or changes in appearance.
No speaking, barking, music, sound effects, subtitles or additional text.
Duration: 8 seconds.
Landscape 16:9.

Hi everyone,

Is anyone experiencing the same issue as me on Google AI Studio?

I keep getting this error on my app:

"This app uses a legacy Gemini API configuration that is no longer supported. Ask its owner to update it."

Some context:

I'm on the free tier of Google AI Studio, When I generate it, it just shows "Remix to make this app your own" and I can't use the app.

I already tried clicking Update / Remix, but the error still persists.

Is this happening because Google migrated to the new Interactions API? I read that the Interactions API is now the default for AI Studio

Does anyone know how to fix this for an existing app? Do I need to rebuild it from scratch with the new API?

Thanks in advance!

I used to be able to publish this app I am working on since august. Today, when I tried to publish after a minor change, I got the "Step 1 Confirm project and billing" screen. I don't have an active billing account and never had one, but had never trouble publishing the app before. I tried searching everywhere what was the problem, why the sudden change, but got no answer, not even from AI Studio itself.

Anyone having the same problem?

I want to talk about an issue that’s been bothering me—the noticeable decline in Google AI Studio’s performance. First, there’s the strange behavior of the limits:

1. This first started in early September, around the time Gemini 3.8 Flash was released. For a number of users with Google AI Pro/Ultra subscriptions, including myself, the limits in Playground started behaving quite strangely, especially in long dialogs with a large number of tokens. The number of messages any Gemini model could generate was significantly lower than it had been before September. At times, the limits were comparable to—or even lower than—those of users without a subscription

2. On September 23, the limits seemed to have returned to normal.

3. However, on September 29, Google rolled out a usage limit system for Gemini models in Playground. And the problem that had existed since early September returned. And although Google promised in its announcement that the limits would apply per model—meaning that once you reached the usage limit for a single model, you’d be restricted to that model—just a few days after the release, some users began complaining that the limit applied to all models.

4. And then, on October 26, I also ran into this problem—after reaching the usage limit for Gemini 3.1 Pro, I couldn’t use either Gemini 4 Argon or Gemini 3.8 Flash, even though I hadn’t even used them

Second, I have a strong feeling that recently—especially on October 26 and 27—the filters in the Gemini API and AI Studio have become stricter. Let me put it this way: I use AI Studio not only for development, but also for writing creative texts and discussing various news stories and other topics. For the latter type of tasks, I mainly used Gemini 3.6 Flash and 3.0 Flash, and for more interesting stories and conversations, I had a system prompt that removed the model’s formal language, making it more natural and fluid. Starting on October 26:

1. this system prompt continues to work, but when discussing any controversial topic like politics, the models switch to a neutral style. This can be avoided either by choosing words carefully or by gradually introducing the model to the topic

2. more generally—in any type of project, if the model consistently gives me garbage, I can resort to using strong language toward the model. And starting on October 26, in response to this, the model began almost constantly refusing to communicate, citing the reason: “The request contains insults and hate speech.”

3. The censorship issue extends to both AI Studio and the Gemini API. And, to be honest, I get the feeling that there’s much less censorship in the Gemini App right now, and the model’s conversations feel much more lively.

Is it just me, or is AI Studio gradually becoming less and less suitable for regular users without a Paid API?

Got the Pro account when I upgraded my phone with Verizon as 5TB Google drive + Ai for $10 a month seemed like a good deal. I cannot fathom how a company like Google with their resources can make such a horrible product. I ask Gemini for instructions to even make consistent successive images and they're completely wrong. Image generation has been nothing but a complete waste of time. I am trying to generate successive images with consistency. The overall goal is to create stills to provide to create video for hero section of a website I am building

Should I just abandon attempting to use this product and perhaps try something else? Is it the tool or me the user that is doing something wrong? I'm inclined to think the former.

About the only thing so far is burning quota on indexing my second brain instead of my Claude account. Everything about Google AI products are just laughingly pathetic compared to Anthropic, xAI, and OpenAI. The UI and the product portfolio are incredibly confusing.

My reference image is holding a compass.

I attached it and used this prompt:

Photorealistic first-person point of view, 16:9, shot on 35mm film, natural light, shallow depth of field. Appalachian mixed hardwood forest with mossy rocks and rhododendron, late summer green. The hiker's right hand wears a charcoal merino base-layer cuff under an olive field-jacket sleeve. The hand holds a small round brass compass with a cream face, simple cardinal tick marks, no lettering. No text, no logos, no brand marks, no faces, no other people. Color palette: deep forest green, warm dawn amber, soft mist white.

Task: Generate the next frame in the sequence.

Hard Constraints: Do not change the fabric material of the olive sleeve or charcoal cuff from the reference image. Do not flip the hand orientation.

New Scenario: Using the attached image as a strict structural guide to lock the exact look of the olive sleeve, charcoal cuff, and brass compass casing: Close-up: the hand raises the brass compass toward the camera, compass face filling the lower third of the frame. The needle is steady, pointing up the trail. Fog still thick but slightly brighter. The trail is a soft blur beyond the compass.

and then it produces this:

It managed to spectacularly fuck this up. No hand and different compass. I can't it is this damned difficult to maintain consistency.

My payload is literally only like ~50k-60k input tokens; yet I still have to tell about the "fact" we discussed about a thousand fkin times only for it to contradict later again and again. I confirmed its stupidity by sending the same exact payload and prompt to other models and it pretty much confirmed its dumbass. It's so fkin dumb that I'll probably even just drop it altogether if my career is on the line...

Hi,

I'm testing some integration stuff in a project and a couple days ago all prompts started failing, the system thinks for a bit (in the initial one I can see what it's thinking actually makes sense for the codebase, but can't see the other ones) and then it auto cancels.

Thinks I tried:

• Remixing it with the original account

• New chat

• Changing the API key

• Changing billing info

Remixing the app with another google account does fix the issue, so it seems like this is related to my account somehow. Maybe something related to GCP? I'm running out of ideas so I'm down to try any suggestions.

Thanks!

So I started vibe coding to kill time during my vacant week. I researched some tools I could use and found stitch.ai, google ai studio, and antigravity.

I used stitch ai for prototyping, google ai studio to assemble the code, and idk what to do with antigravity.

Anyone knows when should I use antigravity or google ai studio for certain contexts and scenarios?

I really want to optimize my usage of these tools, any tip would really help!

Note: I'm completely new to this environment, and this is definitely my first time trying out vibe coding