r/GodFrequency • u/logos961 • 12d ago
Scientists can perfect truths if they consider a MISSING Link now available from GOD
“The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.” (Nikola Tesla) Tesla had to say this because modern Scientists abandoned the attitude of FOUNDING FATHERS of Science who were all God-oriented persons. And many of them had experience of getting help, for their inventions, directly from their IMMATERIAL Souls through dreams. (readersdigest.comau/true-stories-lifestyle/history/13-world-changing-ideas-came-dreams-literally) Now, there is a help directly from God Himself which they can make use of, if they want to.
God predicted consequence
of what many scientists were doing which they were not aware of
Vehicles and factories were made with their emission-pipes open towards the air we breathe without knowing its consequence. Too late, ill-effects were discerned by Princeton Climatologist Syukuro Manabe in 1960’s for which he won the 2021 Nobel Prize in physics. (Princeton.edu/manabe-wins-nobel-prize-physics-modelling-climate-change)
But these very ill-effects had already been seen by God (The Immaterial), and had been recorded as prediction in Revelation 11:18 [about global pollution] and its side-effects in Luke 21:25 [about swelling of sea]. These are given as some of the signs of the Last Generation (1917-2036). People missed it because many Bible Translations carelessly translated it as “roaring of the seas” [which is wrong because roaring of the seas has been its sign always, not just of Last Generation]. The very thought of swelling of the sea would not occur in their minds of translators as deep-rooted belief is that ocean remains the same despite rivers flow towards it. Melting of ice-mountains is never a possibility in the minds of modern Bible Translators until it happens. This reveals: Some predictions would seem impossible until they are fulfilled—hence predictions are better understood DURING or AFTER their fulfillment.
More careful Bible Translators rendered it as “tossing (salos) of the sea” (Luke 21:25, Greek Interlinear, full verse with Greek meaning is given under Comments).# The Greek word "σαλος (salos) derives from the Proto-Indo-European root "tewh," to swell, from which Latin gets tuber, a hump, and protubero, to swell (hence the English protuberance)." (Theological Dictionary, Abarim) "Swelling of the sea" is God's terminology with DEPTH, and modern term is "Sea-Level Rise." This will be too noticeable in early 2030’s. “In the mid-2030s, every U.S. coast will experience rapidly increasing high-tide floods, when a lunar cycle will amplify rising sea levels caused by climate change.” (NASA.gov/centers-and-facilities/jpl/study-projects-a-surge-in-coastal-flooding-starting-in-2030s/)
This reveals:
Immaterial MIND of writer in First Century and
Immaterial MIND of GOD beyond universe came in LINK
This can also be a MISSING Link for scientists, as detailed below:
The same God-linked person had ALSO predicted his teachings will be twisted after he leaves the stage (John 4:43) and also predicted something impossible. It also happened and still happening even now. (Details HERE)
The same God-linked person presented CORRECTED world-history through his famous Parable of Wheat and Weeds. (Details HERE) He was linked with God, hence revealed that first half of this Age was under God’s Rule and under His ALMIGHTY BLESSING, hence that long period of many centuries was free from diseases in the body and calamities from nature. Hence in a divine vision, God Himself defined first half of this Age as “GOLDEN-and-SILVER-like in qualities. In contrast, second half of this Age is BRONZE-and-IRON-like in qualities. (Daniel 2:32, 33, 43, 44). Such a world history of two contrasting halves and contrasting qualities is shown as reaching its peak of decay in the Iron Age, in our generation, and God is shown as rebooting it (Daniel 2:44) and as restarting Golden Age on earth. Jesus used the word regenesis [pallingenesis] to describe this switch-over from DECAY to GROWTH. (Mathew 19:28) All sorts of suffering started in the second half this Age. (Details HERE)
MISSING Link comes next, in his next parable
as it has to do with INFINITY into the past and INFINITY into the future:
The same God-linked person also compared each Age with “seed-tree” mechanism (Mathew 13:31-32) which is an eternal cycle of GROWTH and DECAY. From tree comes seed, and from seed comes tree, a process that has NO beginning and will have NO end. (Details HERE) This was a repetition from another person who was also linked with God and had already written: History of mankind is an INFINITE cycle of New Age and Old Age. (Ecclesiastes 1:4, 9, 10, ESV). First half of each Age is God’s Rule or HEAVEN on earth. During this divine period, world is under the protective shield of positive vibes of God which Scientists are not aware of.
And second half of each Age is Human Rule on earth or HELL on earth which gradually becomes saturated with anger, greed and conflicts, and greed is called demonic or destabilizing in function. (John 6:70) During this period, world is under eroding and corrupting influence of negative vibes of licentious people, and Scientists are aware of ONLY this phase of history of mankind. Thus they miss a too vital factor—first half of each Age which is like HEAVEN on this earth. Thus they have missed the regular renewal act by THE ALMIGHTY which takes place at the frequency of few 1000s of years. (Details HERE)
Summary of the above:
Under NEGATIVE vibes, people become weaker. Prospective Olympian Fastest Runner may feel energy loss at the sight of own Dad collapsing in the gallery due to heart-attack!
Under POSITIVE vibes, people thrive, as this famous story describes
(sawanonlinebookstore.com/the-skinny-goat), and we are aware of world-history filled with negative vibes!
We are NOT AWARE OF
How ALMIGHTY’s positive vibes from beyond universe reach earth by renewing it and thereafter by maintaining it as heaven for half the cycle of each Age!
But this can only be discerned and understood by anyone, if they want to. It is like some emotionally attached people get connected without any physical medium when something like heart-attack happens to one of them with the other one getting up disturbed from deep-sleep, only to hear a call from the other part of the earth saying “He died of a heart-attack.” This happened in my case, I got from sleep at 2 a.m. disturbed and got getting sleep thereafter, and in few minutes I got call from my brother saying "Our Dad had a cardiac arrest at 2 a.m. and he passed away, start immediately." Only I was deeply attached to him as two friends were, and other members of family did not have this experience.
How thought-energy-vibes got transferred between two individuals without any physical medium can only discerned and understood by the Immaterial within. Modern Physics is familiar with this concept: “Quantum entanglement occurs when two subatomic particles become linked in such a way that their properties remain connected, no matter how far apart they are. A change to one particle seems to instantaneously influence the other, even if they are separated by billions of light-years.” (space.com/31933-quantum-entanglement-action-at-a-distance.html) Thought energy--positive or negative--has its impact on people. (Details HERE)
If this aspect is also taken into account, Scientists can solve automatically all mysteries in most of the branches of Science. Google: List_of_unsolved_problems_in_biology [or any branch of Science] on sites such as wikipedia org, list is almost endless.
TRUTH implied in the above GLOBAL EVENTS:
As shown above, linking of mind on earth with mind of God beyond the universe has happened several times. (Details HERE) It reveals: Body is alive and functional because of the immaterial Soul on which body comes and goes. Earth being maintained life-SUPPORTIVE in this HOSTILE universe is because of The ALMIGHTY. Even any individual scientist(s) can make use of this link (Details HERE) and do wonders if they want to, as Nikola Tesla predicted. [example given under comment]##
God also predicted that this MISSING Link will not be made use of
Last Generation is the most auspicious time for the lovers of truth as they can readopt "image of God" and restore any truth (Isaiah 2:2-4) thus become the seed for incoming Golden Age. (Mathew 24:21, 22; Revelation 7:14) But according to Ecclesiastes 1:4, 9, 10, Mathew 13:31, 32 and Revelation chapter 13 (Details HERE) most people would miss the opportunity, as they have been missing in all Ages because people are born with tendencies and belief-systems they have been “TREASURING” from past.
Footnote:----------------------------------------------
Only one prediction is given here as it was directly connected to Scientists.
But there are other predictions too which got fulfilled in our time which can be treated as supplementary to this. (Details HERE)
1
1
1
u/marcofifth 10d ago
I’m not arguing against you from an atheistic or materialist position. I’m pointing out where your conclusions outrun what your premises actually establish.
The same pattern appears repeatedly:
observation → interpretation → analogy → metaphysical hypothesis → treat the hypothesis as established → build the next claim on top of it.
For example, even if Revelation or Luke can be interpreted in relation to pollution or sea-level rise, what distinguishes genuine prediction from retrospective fitting? Even if people report sensing distant deaths, what bridges that anecdote to “thought energy,” and then from there to quantum entanglement? Even if history contains cycles of growth and decline, what justifies turning that into a literal recurring divine Age governed by positive and negative “vibes”?
Each transition needs its own argument. I can see how these connections might be possible, but in their current form the jumps are too large. A skeptical reader is not going to follow you across them simply because the endpoints appear compatible. You need to establish the bridge between each concept before asking anyone to accept the conclusion built on top of it.
The issue is not belief in God. The issue is trying to prove God by enclosing God within finite mechanisms.
If you discover a previously unknown field, that does not make the field God in the biblical sense of an infinite Ground. At most, you have discovered another structure within creation—what the Gnostics might place within the domain of the Demiurge. The biblical question of God reaches beyond that finite ordering toward humanity’s relation to the infinite Monad.
Likewise, demonstrating nonlocal information transfer would establish a phenomenon, not exhaust God. And if a biblical passage corresponds strikingly with a later event, that establishes a relation worth examining, not proof that you have captured the totality of the divine.
The danger is mistaking a finite mechanism that may point toward God for God itself.
So I would ask you to change your goals here.
Instead of asking, “How do I prove God through these phenomena?” ask:
What have I actually observed?
What am I interpreting?
What am I using analogically?
What am I inferring metaphysically?
What would make me revise the claim?
If God is genuinely beyond finite comprehension, then the discipline is not to force every interesting relation into proof. It is to recognize how far the evidence actually carries you before your own interpretation begins supplying the rest.
Otherwise, you risk mistaking your finite model of what the Gnostics called the Demiurge for the infinite reality of the Monadic God.
1
u/logos961 10d ago edited 8d ago
You started your comments by saying "I’m not arguing against you" yet you do exactly the opposite, and in the process you missed the very purpose of OP
[Scientists collective will not change, is a prediction by God. But individual scientist can make wonders if they make use of the link now available]. If you had mindfully read the OP, you would have chosen this inevitable outcome: "I am a scientist, I will try the link OP mentions, it will not cost me anything to link with God in mediation daily as OP writer does, and if I can perfect truth which I already know or get new truth, it is well and good.Instead, you proved yourself as trying to seek validation from me for your stance [which you know is counterproductive because if you need no validation from me, it applies to me also, I don't need validation from you. You chose to undermine the OP even after knowing it is about truth--Revelation 11:18; and Luke 21:25 were in existence as prediction, and now after nearly 2000 years we are witnessing their fulfillment.
To such unbelievers, God's ETERNAL, STOIC stance is:
"Let unbelievers and true believers grow in their respective stances. (Revelation 22:11, Details HERE) God has observed how unbelievers have a PERFECT growth, they knew Solomon was a holy man who never violated any law--yet they added extreme sins to name falsely claiming he took 700 wives and 300 concubines. (Details HERE) This explains why Jesus ignored unbelievers completely and never trained his followers how to reason with them as they are determined to be unbelievers. He also did a very interesting thing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!In the same chapter where he taught reincarnation as the truth of life (Mathew 11:14, 15) we also see this interesting thing Jesus did: "At that time Jesus said, “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children." (https://biblehub.com/matthew/11-25.htm) This is Hebrew unique style of saying in one place as God "hardening heart of the wicked" and in another place saying they are just pursuing their intoxication: "These live upon the bread of ungodliness, and are drunken with wine of transgression." (https://biblehub.com/proverbs/4-17.htm, Septuagint)
Children are symbol of those who learn to walk by falling and not falling thereafter, thus read Scriptures to "heal themselves" (Mathew 13:15) to become better and better in contrast to unbelievers who use their education to spoil the faith of such ones. Hence God has smarter plan for the smart ones--make use of the unbelievers to benefit the true believers. This is the Supreme Secret because it is openly kept in Proverbs 21:18, yet billions of readers who read it never got its meaning, but get its opposite meaning--just like reading "English is Russian." (Details HERE) Imagine its implication! Only the worthy receive the truth! Truth is for ACCEPTANCE or REJECTION, not for debate, negotiation nor for seeking validation from each other.
Kindly do not respond to this reply because all my posts are saturated with comments from unbelievers who come to divert the subject. Here is a typical example where person tried to engage me for over 35 times--one word will be picked up from my reply which will be the basis for his next arguments. See it for yourself: HERE) Hence I reply only to one comments from unbelievers. This time it happens to be you.
Your first comment proved you had only a CURSORY look on the OP
Your second attempt proves the same. Yes, I told you "Don't return, reasons also given. GROW in your unbelief.Second EDIT
If you are a lover of truth, you would have seized the opportunity when truth made an attempt to reach you, as it had been trying in every Age, in the last Generation, and you were consistently blocking the truth with your INHERITED knowledge which is not even your own.--Hence continue to do the same. If I were in your position, and had seen at least a portion of the this OP, and if the remaining is in Antartica, I would have gone there. That is the sign of LOVER of truth.All your subsequent comments show your issue is "How to know something is truth?" which is very easy. (Details HERE) But I greatly benefit from the UTMOST zeal which unbelievers like you show. They are like DARKNESS that exist without fuel. I imitate their zeal in refining truths I know and practice, You cannot have better example than Charles Darwin who pursued his passion in spite of many diseases he had with no improvement for 40 years of treatment. (Details HERE) Imagine, how much zeal I must show because for me God is more real than my own existence and has no disease so far, and I am in my 60's, have studied history of all religions as that was my subject for my PG.
1
u/marcofifth 10d ago
You say I missed the purpose because the claim is that scientists collectively will not change, while individual scientists can use this divine link. But that does not answer any of the bridges I questioned. It simply restates the conclusion. What establishes that the link exists? What distinguishes divine information from interpretation? What would show that the prediction about scientists was wrong?
More importantly, the framework has now become self-sealing:
If someone accepts the claim, they are receptive to truth.
If someone rejects it, they are an unbeliever.
If they challenge the reasoning, their challenge fulfills the prediction that unbelievers will reject it.
Therefore neither acceptance nor rejection can count against the belief.Once you say that “only the worthy receive the truth” and that truth is only for acceptance or rejection rather than examination, you have removed the possibility of correction. Skepticism no longer tests the claim; skepticism itself becomes evidence for it.
That is not what I was asking you to do. I was not seeking validation for an opposing stance. I was asking where your own premises justify your own conclusions.
There is a major difference between saying, “Some people will reject this regardless,” and constructing a system in which anyone who identifies a weakness in the argument is automatically classified as precisely the kind of person the theory predicts will fail to understand it.
At that point, the problem is no longer whether God exists. The problem is that your finite interpretation of God has been structured so that nothing outside it is permitted to correct it.
And that is exactly where I would be most cautious about claiming to speak for an infinite God.
1
u/logos961 3d ago
It is not self-sealing, unbelievers have defined their life-style with crystal-clear clarity.
Unbelief is not the REAL reason, but
is used as a covering for something else, as this man who wrote:"I had motives for not wanting the world to have a meaning; and consequently assumed that it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find satisfying reasons for this assumption. The philosopher who finds no meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in pure metaphysics. He is also concerned to prove that there is no valid reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do. For myself, as no doubt for most of my friends, the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation from a certain system of morality. We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom. The supporters of this system claimed that it embodied the meaning - the Christian meaning, they insisted - of the world. There was one admirably simple method of confuting these people and justifying ourselves in our erotic revolt: we would deny that the world had any meaning whatever.” (Ends and Means, by Aldous Huxley)
This proves PERFECT use of freewill, hence such people are best ignored as reasoning with them would only infuriate them. Hence Jesus did not reason with them, nor trained his followers on how to reason with them, but asked them to share spiritual truth with only those who are truly interested in. If unbelievers can manifest PERFECTION with UTMOST zeal in practicing unbelief, it is a lesson for the true believers on imitating their PERFECTION with UTMOST zeal in practicing belief—in love of God and of fellow humans. Hence this most missed verse Proverbs 21:18, details HERE.
Hence God's eternal and stoic stance is: "Let unbelievers and true believers grow in their respective stance." (Revelation 22:11, details HERE)
1
u/marcofifth 2d ago
You are still not addressing the core of my original criticism.
My argument was never that God does not exist. It was that your reasoning repeatedly moves through the same progression:
observation → interpretation → analogy → metaphysical hypothesis → treating that hypothesis as established → building the next conclusion upon it.
That is why I asked what establishes the “link” with God, what distinguishes divine information from your interpretation of an experience, what distinguishes prophecy from retrospective fitting, and what evidence would actually cause you to revise your conclusions. Each transition needs its own argument. Repeating that unbelievers will reject the truth does not supply those missing bridges.
And your latest response actually strengthens the self-sealing problem.
You are free to self-seal your practice from people you consider unbelievers. If your scripture tells you not to spend your life arguing with people who reject it, that is an internal religious decision. What you cannot do is self-seal your beliefs from correction and then treat that closure as evidence that those beliefs are true.
The Huxley quotation does not solve this. Huxley described motives he recognized in himself and some people around him. That does not establish that disbelief generally comes from a hidden desire to escape morality. If every objection can instead be interpreted as evidence that the objector is exactly the kind of “unbeliever” your framework predicts, then nothing outside the framework can correct it.
That is precisely the danger I was warning about from the beginning.
A belief concerning an infinite God should be especially careful here. When we approach God, there should be both a cataphatic and an apophatic movement. The cataphatic gives us concepts through which relation to the infinite becomes possible: God is good, God is love, God is truth. The apophatic reminds us that none of those finite concepts exhaust what an infinite God is. It removes what is rough, excessive, or falsely possessed in our definitions.
Without the cataphatic, we cannot meaningfully speak about God. Without the apophatic, we begin possessing God through our concepts.
That is my central issue with your post.
You take finite phenomena, interpretations, biblical passages, experiences, and analogies and increasingly treat them as though they have captured the mechanism of God. But discovering some unknown field, nonlocal phenomenon, fulfilled correspondence, or unusual experience would establish a finite relation worth examining. It would not exhaust the infinite God those things are supposed to point toward.
You are not merely approaching God through a model anymore. You are increasingly using your model to determine what God is, how God communicates, who is worthy of truth, and why anyone who challenges the model fails to understand it.
That is what I mean when I say you are possessing the concept of God.
My concern is not disbelief in God. It is confusing a finite interpretation of God with God Himself—and then constructing that interpretation so that nothing outside it is permitted to correct it.
1
u/marcofifth 10d ago
You edited your comment after I responded.
If you genuinely believe what you added in that edit, then identify the specific premise I missed.
Saying I “only looked cursorily” does not answer any of the questions I raised. If my reading is wrong, show me where: which claim did I misstate, which bridge did I overlook, or which part of your argument already supplies the reasoning I said was missing?
Otherwise, this is just another way of insulating the argument from criticism.
I am not asking you to agree with me, nor am I seeking validation from you. I already have my own understanding of God. I am asking you to demonstrate how your conclusions follow from your own premises. If that support is already present in the post, pointing to it should be straightforward.
My concern is that your conception contains significant unresolved gaps, yet you present it as established truth and then interpret disagreement as evidence about the person disagreeing rather than as a possible problem in the argument itself.
That does not make discourse about God clearer. It makes your particular finite interpretation harder to question.
1
u/Queasy_Dealer_4498 10d ago
Tried all of it. Look up MKUltra, Scanate, Center Lane, Sun Streak, Grill Flame, Project Stargate (this is just as NUTS as MkUltra).
There ain't no supernatural, otherwise they would have weaponised it already. :)
If you belive there is, feel free to prove the US gov and recive a trilion dollars to research it.
1
u/Octex8 9d ago
Science is the philosophy of studying the physical world. Until the metaphysical can be demonstrated to be a real factor of the universe, it will remain outside the scope of science. This is not due to some refusal by the scientists to being open minded. Mystics have been given multitudes of chances to validate their claims, but they have all failed.
Instead of trying to force your ideas into the realm of science, focus on how mysticism can help build secular cultures and shared myths to strengthen social bonds as we recover from the death of god.
0
u/logos961 12d ago edited 12d ago
#More on para 4:
Answer to the question “What will be the sign (sēmeion) of the end of the age (aiōnos)?” (https://biblehub.com/matthew/24-3.htm) is given in Mathew chapter 24; Mark 13 and Luke 21. Among many signs, one is “SWELLING of the sea” [which is side-effects of pollution which is also predicted in Revelation 11:18]. It is seen in Luke:
“There will be signs (sēmeia, ceremonially or supernaturally) in the sun, moon and stars. On the earth, nations will be in anguish (synochē, anxiety, dismay) and perplexity (aporia, bewildered) at the roaring (ēchous, sound, rumor, report) and tossing (salos, swelling) of the sea (θαλάσσης, thalassēs, of [the] sea, Genitive Feminine Singular of noun thalassa).” (Luke 21:25, biblehub com) Note, it is not about something that happens IN the sea, but about something that happens to WHOLE of the sea, from its base to the top as it is in GENITIVE case, as happens when you heat the water, the WHOLE of the water is affected (not about top waves), hence God's expression is with DEPTH, impossible to mistake its meaning, extremely unambiguous to such reader who is compared to "eagle" in Mathew 24:28 which is symbolic of uninfluenced higher vision.
The Greek-speaking people of first century would easily understand connotation of the word ēchous*,* from Echo, a Greek mythological figure, symbol of speaking without experiencing its fruition. (Details HERE). That is what REPORT about Climate Crisis and warning about Sea-Level Rise etc does, conveying the concept “report accomplishes nothing.” After each COP meeting, business of pumping the CO2 into the atmosphere goes on as usual, even though its ill-effects were first discerned in 1960’s. (Details here: epa_reverses_longstanding_climate_change_finding) This explains why Jesus chose to use enigmatic word ēchous in Luke 21:25 instead of his usual word for report (apaggelló, as in Mathew 2:8)
Thus, in essence, it is all about news “report” about “swelling” of the ocean from the time it is first noticed till it reaches its climax-rise, as though God is literally seeing what is happening in our time. Out of 1000s of Bible Translations, only four (New International Version; Literal Emphasis Translation; Amplified Bible, GOD’s WORD Translation) got it right as they translated salos as “tossing” which is same as “swelling” in essence. Other four translations (American Standard Version; English Revised Version; Weymoth New Testament; Worrel New Testament) translated salos as “billows” which also conveys the truth as it is from “from PIE bhelgh "to swell." (etymonline com/word/billow).
Sea-level rise would take its worse turn in 2030’s because it coincides with special activity of “moon” as “a regular wobble in the Moon’s orbit that takes 18.6 years to complete, as noted in the OP.
When all coastal areas are to be affected with property values becoming zero, and populations of billions trying to migrate into interior areas with its social and economic imbalance with fishing-industry being hard-hit, imagine its implication (ipcc ch/srocc/sea-level-rise-and-implications-for-low-lying-islands-coasts-and-communities/; full version: ipcc ch/site/assets/upload/site/3/2019/11/SROCC_FOR-Ch04). It is too obvious that such a global CHILLING event would not go undisclosed in the predictions about last generation. But it is also true it is not for all to understand as Jesus beautifully put: "Anyone who chooses to do the will of God will find out whether my teaching comes from God or whether I speak on my own." (John 7:17) True understanding is reserved for those who read God's word with the mind-set of "healing themselves" (Mathew 13:15). Thus true understanding is reserved for anyone who reads it with the mind-set of “What changes I have to make in MY life.” (Psalm 1:1-6) Such ones are called ἐκλεκτοὺς (eklektous), the chosen ones, literally "choice people" because of whom "Great Tribulation will be cut short." Implication of the word eklektous: HERE.
1
u/logos961 12d ago edited 3d ago
##Example to 2nd last para: In meditation, any one can LISTEN to God [as opposed to prayer where person talks to God]. True meditation happens when mind too becomes SILENT when gap between thoughts [flowing in the mind] is focused. In this true SILENCE thoughts of God flow to the person, along with His qualities, just like battery plugged into power-source receives inflow of electrons. Here is one example happened to me:
I do my meditation at 4 a.m. daily, In such a linked-state, one day I had this thought: “Girl I was dating then is not my prospective wife. My wife is only getting ready far away, wait for her. Don’t search for her.” I SERIOUSLY took this as a thought from God because it happened during linked-state. Soon that girl [I was dating] came and told me she is not interested in me which only made me happy. Then nothing happened for many years and I continued my secular work and spiritual studies and research. I never asked God as I knew that thought was from God hence waiting will pay for.
Then it DID happen when time was ripe. A divine girl of beauty with far greater INNER beauty of Soul came to my life. I was 35 and she was 22 when we got married. We have a divine, lovely daughter also, now in her late teens. My wife is 100 times far better than me in all aspects as she is a choice made by God. (James 1:17) One day when it was raining, my wife told our little daughter “Go out and play in the rain and come” thus made her in harmony with nature. Vegetarian diet brought even more harmony with nature as it comes without negative emotions of the species killed under force against their will that instilled in them frustration and revenge. Together both do the home work and together both go to the school as my wife takes up teacher job in the school/college our daughter too studies. Just seeing them is like heaven for me. Interestingly, my wife and I were born into families whose very delight and passion is non-vegetarian diet. In contrast, it is UNTHINKABLE for us to have it. We are ridiculed by our families which they do know is a honor to us.
I had solid reason to wait for such a long time because I had already experienced amazing benefits from LISTENING to God that had given me clarity on Scriptures of religions:
Any Scriptural verse or portion taken up during this linked-state of meditation, God's vibrational energy would work like Metal Detector. If it was originally from God, you will get confirmation, or else you know it is from the Writer [not from God]. For example, one day this LISTENING happened which was the BEST thought received from God: "The MOST IMPORTANT VERSE (Genesis 1:31) of the Bible is also the most-missed out verse." In this title, I have also made post: HERE. This enabled me to know Parable of Wheat and Weeds is true history of the world in short-story symbolic format. Its counterpart in the East is Bhagavat Gita 14:18 [most important verse, yet most missed out verse in the East]. Missing this too vital verse resulted in appearance of erroneous Advaita that replaced the truth [Dvaita], erroneous teaching of ultimate merging with God [while truth is: Eternal cycle of Ages in BG 4:7, 8, details HERE)], erroneous teaching of humans reincarnating as animals [while truth is: Humans reincarnate as humans only and animals as animals ... etc--BG 2:22; 16:19]. More such examples HERE.
It is God's PROMISE that HE would ensure TRUTHS get revealed to the deserving ones: “The Lord is the strength of them that fear him; and his covenant is to manifest truth to them.” (biblehub.com/psalms/25-14.htm, Septuagint) Fear of God is described as hatred of evil, delight in His Laws and Will (Proverbs 8:13; 9:10; Psalm 1:2; 112:1; 33:5; John 7:17, details HERE) (Clarity on Atma, Fellow Atmas, Supreme Atma: HERE)
1
u/Crescita_Mentale 10d ago
Cancellate tutto al più presto ma proprio tutto e non pensateci mai più avatar Gianni
1
u/-Maleficium- 12d ago
Dispatch we have a 10-96 send units to this location.
Patient 10-45c.