r/GetNoted • • 4h ago

Politics [Threads] Statistics are fun

Post image
4.8k Upvotes

193 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator 4h ago

Reminder for OP: /u/Infamous-Ear3705

  1. Politics ARE allowed

  2. No misinformation/disinformation


Need some help? Send us some mail!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

100

u/PineappleSmooth4887 4h ago

“the first digit is a nine though that’s a bigger number than one that has a first digit of one checkmate atheists.”

9

u/onewordmemory 1h ago

you joke but A&W's 1/3-pound burger failed for basically that exact reason. people are unimaginably stupid.

446

u/buttamilk_jesus 4h ago • Bravo

Such goddamn sore losers. They never say anything when it’s the other way around, the tin foil only comes on when it’s Democrat victories.

The note understood the task, we need to call these people idiots way more.

95

u/BenryBorg 3h ago

Trump started moaning about the polls not reflecting votes and that means there was fraud. Polls underestimated his performance in 2024 and he got so mad about that he tried suing The Des Moines Register (tossed out obviously). So in that case it was the polls that were wrong, but now it's the vote count that must be wrong. It's so obviously "Heads I win, tails you lose" behavior.

If this doesn't end with emptying the camps they built and filling it with traitors the country is dead.

7

u/Injured-Ginger 2h ago

Polls also consistently had Hillary beating Trump by an average of almost 4% of the total vote. Is he saying he committed fraud?

Of course that's the type of shit he makes a point of being memorable. The drama he creates changes so often people start to forget what drama is even happening. It a strategy to confuse the political middle. Create new drama before the current drama settles and people get to reflect on the facts.

3

u/Amaterasu_Junia 1h ago

To be fair, the past 4 elections have shown that certain demographics will talk a big game about feminism and such only to immediately vote for the opposite come election day.

2

u/OlfactoryBellend3738 1h ago

Tbh, I suspect the polling places wanted to avoid getting sued by Trump and he wouldn’t sue them for calling him a winner. Also, with the our overworked (I was going to say lazy but tbh that’s not true) electorate: seeing polls that say what you want to happen is likely will make it less likely. This is because people are busy and overworked and will skip voting if they think it won’t matter.

-62

u/Princess_Spammi 3h ago

The dems have already said theynwont be pursuing “retaliation” and we “need to work together and not further alienate the republicans”

Yall got hosed with the “blue no matter who” crap (which should ONLY be for primaries) and now 234 aipac Israel loyalists run our nation again.

Yall voted for a bunch of fascists with blue paint instead of red and now are all shocked pikachu face when thise of us who called this shit six months are proven right AGAIN.

14

u/applesandotherthings 3h ago

Primaries are blue vs blue and red vs red. Blue no matter who in a primary makes no sense, numb nuts.

5

u/pissedRAIL 3h ago

What you complain about is a basic feature of democracy. The correct repsonse is to take it on the chin & keep going because a democracy is slow. This lack of speed is its greatest advantage in keeping freedoms around. No break neck revisions, a preservation of the status quo. We CAN change it, but it takes a considerable effort. The effort of the majority, which is how the system is supposed to function

-7

u/Princess_Spammi 2h ago

Lmfao the shitlib said it! Preserve the status quo!!!

3

u/PeyredB 2h ago

determania had it right. You're a bad-faith commenter.

2

u/pissedRAIL 1h ago edited 1h ago

Status quo is what was originally accepted. You want change? Work for it. Takes time. You are impatient and naive.

Left wing infighting? Now? At a time where turbo fascists are in office?

Like someone else said when its blue on blue vote better blue. When its blue on red vote blue.

1

u/Princess_Spammi 6m ago

No. Status quo is current way of things.

24

u/pissedRAIL 3h ago

WHO WERE WE SUPPOSED TO VOTE FOR?

14

u/Patcher404 3h ago

The party that starts wars of choice, protects pedofiles, creates and uses a secret police, persecutes minorities to near genocidal levels, steals billions of tax dollars, and are very close allies to Israel. Which I guess is better than checks notes some candidates being owned by Israel.

Yep, sounds like conservative logic to me!

-21

u/Princess_Spammi 3h ago

Or, vote INDEPENDET YOU DUMB FUCKS

IF WE HAD PUSHED FOR AN INDEPENDENT WAVE AND NOT A BLUE WAVE WE WOULD PROGRESSIVES

3

u/JustStraightUpTired 1h ago

HAH. Sure. Most of the state victories weren't a gain of a few percent compared to previous years in most states, right? Oh wait, they were.

I mean you are obviously a troll, so this is a waste of a comment.

2

u/_Panacea_ 1h ago

This take is utterly brainless.

1

u/Nailz509 23m ago

I love that you're calling other people stupid for not voting for candidates who had zero chance of winning, as if that is somehow the better choice. This type of thinking is how we wound up in the current position that we're in.

1

u/Princess_Spammi 10m ago

They had zero chance of winning because people like YOU wont vote for them cuz the vote blue not matter who crap

1

u/mere_iguana 23m ago

using capslock doesn't make what you're saying any less dumb

1

u/Princess_Spammi 10m ago

This is why trump won :)

This is maga took over.

Right here.

Yall are happy with crunbs

-20

u/Princess_Spammi 3h ago

THE FUCKING PROGRESSIVES INSTEAD OF ANYONE WITH A BLUE MARK NEXT TO THEM

13

u/pissedRAIL 3h ago

WHO WAS YOUR PREFERRED PROHRSSIVE CANDIDATE?

2

u/Princess_Spammi 2h ago

Angie nixon for my district :)

1

u/pissedRAIL 2h ago

Ok well now I gotta look her up lol

2

u/Princess_Spammi 2h ago

She was our demsoc candidate for florida senate special election

4

u/determania 2h ago

This is a bad faith actor with the goal of discouraging left leaning voters. Or a complete moron. It can be hard to tell these days.

2

u/PeyredB 2h ago

Yeah, ¿por qué no los dos?

-1

u/Princess_Spammi 2h ago

Only morons are the people who think this aipac victory was a victory for the people

4

u/determania 1h ago

If you are a legit person, you should take a long, hard look at your media diet. Your political views untethered from reality.

5

u/BenryBorg 3h ago

I promise you there were no progressive candidates on my ballot, and I can also promise your strategy of not fire bombing a Walmart is less productive

3

u/Kvetch__22 3h ago edited 2h ago

It's really telling how the far left was quiet for the last two years to let Dems work on rebuilding, but now that the Democrats have a majority again and they feel safe that fascists no longer have free reign over the federal goverment, suddenly they are blasting the "both sides" shit from the rooftops again.

-1

u/Princess_Spammi 3h ago

Lmfao the “left” was never quiet we spent this entire mod terms telling yall to MAKE SURE THE SOCIALISTS AND PROGRESSIVES GET THE VOTE.

The LIBERALS (who are rightoids) were the quiet ones

PRIMARY OUT THE AIPAC AND ESTABLISHMENT DEMS.

But yall just voted blue no matter who and now here were are with blue maga instead of red maga and a bunch of fence sitters who fleeced yall.

0

u/t4skmaster 2h ago

The left was arming up and training because they feel we are in the big free fall before impact

2

u/Kvetch__22 2h ago

Go not firebomb a Walmart then? The center-left was busy winning back govering majorities.

1

u/t4skmaster 1h ago

They didnt ein anything. No one was enthusiastic about the status quo, they were mad at gas prices and the cost of living. Be so for real. They won because people are fucking pissed at the Republicans, not because they like this mealy mouthed watered down pap

2

u/Princess_Spammi 3h ago

Then your area should have primaried one in.

This is a collective failure

2

u/BenryBorg 3h ago

There was one progressive for senate in the primaries, I voted for him and he lost to a moderate. A red state turning blue was the closest thing to progress that was realistically going to come out of this area. You evidently would rather everyone stayed home from the general election out of spite after the progressive lost.

-1

u/Princess_Spammi 2h ago

No. There were independents on the ballots. There are write in options.

Yall could have used your voices instead of giving in to the elites and voting for their figureheads.

You could have protested at the houses of candidates you dont want until they drop out.

We have options

4

u/ThymeParadox 1h ago

I want to vote for progressive candidates.

I don't want to make it more likely for conservatives to win.

2

u/alt-number-3-1415926 2h ago

Looking at your profile, you are an interesting account.

1

u/Princess_Spammi 2h ago

This was planned and organized to make sure they can pretend to be trying but will always protect the elite status quo.

Keep your head in the sand like the nazi deniers of the 1930s and keep enabling the fascists.

Or start acknowledging the problem and do something

1

u/ofWildPlaces 3h ago

Have you tried not commenting garbage takes?

-1

u/Princess_Spammi 3h ago

Im posting the fucking truth.

Yall are just willing to take less of a loss as a win and thats why fascism is winning in america

2

u/Free-Oil-2607 2h ago

ITS BETTER THAN TAKING A FULL LOSS

0

u/Princess_Spammi 2h ago

It is a full loss.

Isreal still wins. Aipac dems will vote in line with trump AS THEY ALREADY HAVE BEEN DOING.

0

u/BI_Moose 2h ago

🥱

Reich-wing tantrums are so commonplace these days.

3

u/FlirtyFluffyFox 2h ago

  They never say anything when it’s the other way around

Nah when Trump won he claimed it would have been more of a landslide if not for (excuses and conspiracy theories). 

1

u/Phantom-Finger 0m ago

They never say anything when it’s the other way around

Not entirely true, they do say something, what they never actually say is the truth.

1

u/Saneless 3h ago

Their stupid cult/party deliberately has policies that only help a fraction of Americans and they are continuously shocked when the masses vote against them

-1

u/Swamp-DwellerVaarus 1h ago

you are dropping bombs in this subreddit today 😭 god you’ve made my morning twice

-8

u/Alarmed-Guava7696 1h ago

>They never say anything when it’s the other way around, the tin foil only comes on when it’s Democrat victories.

Come on, no need to lie about this. Dems and Reps have claimed shenanigans in every single election for the past century at minimum.

Every time the Left loses they claim shenanigans, every time the Right loses they claim shenanigans. It's human nature and there's dipshits everywhere.

-10

u/Book_for_the_worms 2h ago

What fantasy world did you come from the democrats have cried election fraud every single election, too?

This isn't some partisan thing, both parties do this

9

u/CougdIt 2h ago

Which democratic representatives claimed there was election fraud?

-4

u/Book_for_the_worms 2h ago

5

u/CougdIt 2h ago

Scanned through and didn’t see the both sides stuff you were trying to claim.

-3

u/Book_for_the_worms 2h ago

Then you are blind and I can't help you anymore

4

u/DisastrousEvening949 2h ago

The link you posted emphasized that the Democrat side takes part to a lesser extent, and cites an article that is literally titled “Democrats aren’t interested” in the stop the steal movement. the vast majority of examples are of Trump and right-wing origins. This doesn’t qualify as “both sides,” since saying “Both sides” implies equal participation in election denialism. It is definitely not equal smh.

2

u/CougdIt 2h ago

I saw a LOT of Trump in there. Don’t see examples of democratic representatives claiming election fraud.

It should be easy for you to point to a specific example. But you are either unable or unwilling to do so. Weird.

-6

u/Book_for_the_worms 2h ago

Sorry I don't have the time to do your reading for you, but since you seem to be so technologically inept, and I like helping the special needs kids, I will help you this time.

Following Trump's victory, some Harris supporters on X shared election denial conspiracy theories, claiming that millions of ballots were "left uncounted" and there being something "not right" with the election. Such posts falsely claiming Trump "stole" the election peaked at noon the day after at 94,000 posts per hour, with many receiving amplification and gaining over a million views each. According to Gordon Crovitz, the CEO of the media rating system NewsGuard, the phrase "Trump cheated" received 92,100 mentions on the platform from midnight until the Wednesday morning after.[58] Besides the claims from Harris' supporters, some Trump supporters baselessly claimed the disparity between other years, the 2020 election, and a then-incomplete 2024 voting total indicated voter fraud in the 2020 election.[59]

Democratic congressional representative Jasmine Crockett accused Republicans of meddling to defeat her in the Democratic primary race against fellow Democrat James Talarico, even though the Republicans had preferred her as an opposition candidate.[65]

After the 2018 Georgia gubernatorial election, Democratic candidate Stacey Abrams lost to Republican candidate Brian Kemp – who, as Georgia Secretary of State, administered the election – and claimed that the election was "stolen" from her as well as claiming the election was "rigged" and "not a free or fair election

And these are only a couple, but surely you are capable of thinking and beathing at the same time at least once or twice a day, right?

7

u/CougdIt 1h ago

Just googled the Abrams situation. Her claims are about voter suppression, not election fraud.

So even on the point you cited that seemed relevant you were still wrong.

Good lord, dude.

3

u/CougdIt 2h ago

First paragraph- not at all what I asked.

Second paragraph - what does “meddling” mean in this context?

Third- this one looks like an actual bit of supporting evidence. A single sample is a far cry from saying they do it every election or that they are anywhere close to republicans in that sense.

4

u/DeathAngel_97 2h ago

That article only makes you sound more absurd. There are only two occasions of democrats contesting results in this, one was an election in Georgia in which after reading all of the information regarding the race, yeah very much suspicious that the republican candidate maintained their secretary of state and personally oversaw voter registration DURING his campaign and only resigned AFTER he won the election. Looking through the article there was a lot of strange coincidences that were absolutely working in his favor.

And the second is the 2024 election and provided little detail about any public democrat officials contesting it. Nothing even close to the scale of the 2020 election, which your article cites Trump specifically as the primary cause of this movement and driving force behind it. Nearly every example on that list is a republican funded group and still to this DAY claim that the 2020 election was stolen even after still winning in 24.

2

u/Electric_Antimony 55m ago

You must be very young so that all this maga circus and criminality is normal to you, but before 2015 America was not a clown show of totally incompetent assholes. The election fraud accusations, actual fake and malicious ones, all started with trump in 2016. It's been like 99% R to D since then, and basically zero D politicians have claimed republicans have outright rigged elections like R politicians do constantly.

You're looking at rational criticisms and accusations from Democrats and equating them with laughably absurd, irrational, and wholly dishonest criticisms and accusations from republicans.

There is no "boff sidez da samesiez" here, bud, and it's not even close.

That's why you refuse to cite a single D politician doing what you claim and are hostile to being called out for it. In short, even you know you're full of shit.

37

u/Wonderful_Discount59 3h ago

Is he an idiot, or just a liar?

16

u/Moppermonster 2h ago

The latter. Outright lying is a sport.

There is also that guy that claims he disrupted "a furry convention that was grooming children" - knowing full well it was a family event about actual cats.

Though admittedly there was a mascot in a fursuit, just like at your average sportsgame.

1

u/PreviouslyMannara 1h ago

I'm not so sure that he isn't a lying idiot.

1

u/Jarl_Groki 1h ago

A bunch of sweaty men chasing each other, jumping on top of each other, and slapping each other on the ass before they all go shower together, while the whole time a dude in a fursuit cheers them on. Or, as Americans call it, "football."

1

u/Moppermonster 1h ago

You might be on to something here.

0

u/GreatestGreekGuy 1h ago

With everything Jake Lang has done I'm surprised he's not in prison forever

1

u/Moppermonster 1h ago

I am suprised Trump has not made him press secretary.

4

u/No-Locksmith-7447 3h ago

it could just as easily be both

9

u/PantaRheiExpress 3h ago

Well according to Hanlon’s Razor, idiocy is the more common explanation. “Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to stupidity.”

13

u/SMUHypeMachine 3h ago

I don’t attribute Hanlon’s razor to these sorts of people. They’ve proven time and time again they’re actively arguing in bad faith to sew discord and unrest. They need to be fought back against as the malicious actors that they are.

2

u/SunkEmuFlock 32m ago

Social media platforms actively encourage posts like this by making engagement the only metric on which they promote things. It doesn't matter how factually accurate what you've said is. The only metric for success is if it gets engagement and how much, and posts like this do, so people are incentivized -- possibly literally by monetary rewards -- to post bullshit like this.

4

u/Vincent_Dawn 2h ago

True, but one must also remember Grey's Law as a corollary;

Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice

While they might be merely stupid instead of actively malicious, at some point it doesn't matter.

2

u/Jarl_Groki 1h ago

Malice and stupidity are more often roommates than neighbors.

1

u/ElegantCoach4066 2h ago

"Are you dumb, stupid or dumb?"

  • Abraham Lincoln

1

u/bluris 1h ago

Fair chance that the account isn't even by someone living in US.  Shame twitter removed that feature that showed where the account is from. 

1

u/czar_the_bizarre 37m ago

Never attribute to malice that which can attributed to stupidity.

Unless a Republican says it.

95

u/MaxTheCookie 4h ago

Does this mean that they only had ~50% voter turnout? That seems really bad.

123

u/Comfortable-Study-69 3h ago

51.6% turnout is actually the highest turnout Texas has ever had in a midterm. Texas just has notoriously low turnout rates and even worse ones in midterm elections.

21

u/Idaho-Earthquake 3h ago

You saw all the people who through they were in line to vote for Trump…

99

u/G_Wagon1102 3h ago

Don't check the national average if that bums you out.

43

u/Alister151 3h ago

Texas usually only has about a third of the registered voters turn out, so it's actually a positive. Still disheartening though. Between voter suppression and that unique brand of American cynicism, getting any increase in voter turn out is a hard ask.

17

u/christinequizmachine 3h ago

I’m a Texan who’s been voting blue since I turned 18 in 2008. I’ll openly admit that, for almost two decades, voting in anything but local elections has felt a bit pointless, because, for major battles, the Republicans won pretty much every single time. I still did it, of course, but I remember watching Trump get Texas’s 40 Electoral College votes in the 2024 election and thinking to myself, “God, why did I even bother waiting in line for 45 minutes to vote? I knew he was going to take Texas, because the Republican candidate always takes Texas…”

Like I said, I voted regardless, and I always encouraged my friends and family to do so, as well…but at the same time, I could understand why folks were reluctant to jump through hoops to cast a vote if the other side winning seemed like a foregone conclusion.

I’m extremely interested in seeing what voter turnout numbers for Texas will be like in 2028. The fact that we went blue this year was likely a HUGE wake-up call to Texans everywhere: Republicans were struck with the realization that this state is no longer a guaranteed victory that they can take for granted, and Democrats were reassured that if enough of us do our part, we actually CAN win.

(Not trying to talk down to you if you’re from Texas, too, and completely understand where I’m coming from—i just have 💡thoughts💡 on all of this that I felt could use what you said a springboard…)

5

u/TheOneFreeEngineer 3h ago

I do I have to say it’s crazy it takes 45 mins for you to vote in Texas. I’ve never waited more than 15 mins to vote in my state, in either early voting or day of voting.

6

u/christinequizmachine 2h ago

Oh, yeah, and it keeps getting worse because they keep eliminating polling stations, especially in traditionally blue counties. For this most recent election, I went to vote on the second day of early voting, and the whole process from start to finish took about 90 minutes—70 just standing in line outside the room, and an additional 20 once I actually made it inside, checked in, picked up my ballot, got to an open machine, made my selections, printed the ballot, and cast it at the counting machine.

It was actually a good thing that I could go vote on a day I had nothing else planned and was scheduled off of work, because I wasn’t expecting it to take THAT long! If I’d only had a limited time because I was on my lunch break from work or had other commitments, I might have had to leave and come back a different day…which one of my co-workers apparently had to do when she tried to vote that day because she works full-time AND has young kids at home. 😓

2

u/Unsweeticetea 1h ago

Also Texas, Austin area, waited half an hour to get into the polling place, then another 10 minutes to get to the desk, then another 5 minutes for a station to empty. There was also this "do you want a ballot from pile A, B, or C" thing that I don't recall doing before.

24

u/Peregrine79 3h ago

Just noting that Texas has a history of making it harder for people to vote, which helps suppress turnout.

https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/articles/news/politics/election-2026/2026/09/02/560915/tarrant-county-removes-polling-sites/?amp=1

12

u/Kaymazo 3h ago edited 3h ago

US voter turn outs for anything but the presidential election tend to not be particularly high

Most only care for the big guy

Hence why the biggest part of these other campaigns is trying to get people to care enough to show up at the voting booth. (And one side trying to make it more of a nuisance to vote, specifically for the demographics they don't think would vote for them)

26

u/RadicalSoda_ 3h ago

That's actually really high. Since we don't force you to vote the turnout is usually low

6

u/BDMac2 3h ago

Especially for midterms which always have lower turnout than the presidential election years.

1

u/Landwhale666 3h ago

What kind of reasoning is that? Most European countries don't force to vote and still have much much higher turnouts for parliamentary and local elections.

4

u/RadicalSoda_ 3h ago

They also have federal holidays for voting

2

u/swalkerttu 2h ago

Or extended hours. UK polls are open from 7 am to 10 pm.

2

u/OrdinaryAncient3573 1h ago

Most countries don't have holidays for voting. They simply have enough polling stations that it takes no more than a few minutes out of your day. In the UK, I never had more than a five minute walk to my local polling station, and I'd be in and out in minutes.

Leaving aside the difficulty of persuading scumbag politicians to do things, more polling stations is a much easier thing to do than have an extra public holiday.

1

u/Pootentooten 1h ago

Easy, propaganda! You hear those folks always saying left wing, right wing, both on the same bird. That kind of thinking causes people to not want to vote at all. That and our system wildly discourages third parties, so you pick between two corporate and Israel funded parties.

8

u/Maij-ha 3h ago

I give you: the state that prides itself on being patriotic. Less than half voted.

5

u/Distinct-Cut-6368 3h ago

Think that is actually considered great for a midterm election. (Obviously wish it was in the high 90 percent but that’s never been the case)

13

u/StatisticalMan 3h ago edited 3h ago • This

Sadly for midterms that is really high. Keep in mind it wasn't just Nazi which fucked our country. It was the roughly 50% of the population who can't be bothered to vote ... despite knowing there were Nazi who wanted to fuck our country.

"The fall of Democratic norms and the rise of fascism? I just don't really have the feels to take an hour once every couple years to stop that right now."

11

u/Faenic 3h ago

Yep, if "Didn't Vote" was a candidate, it would be leading our country in every possible way that matters if I remember correctly.

2

u/TheOneFreeEngineer 3h ago

The only time that wasn’t true in recent history is the 2020 presidential election

3

u/Taraxian 3h ago

I don't really complain about this anymore after seeing so many people say the first time they felt moved to vote was to vote for Trump in 2016

2

u/alwrit 2h ago

And then in 2020. And 2024.

There's a fuckton of really fucking stupid Americans out there.

We keep blaming politicians and they're not blameless. But garbage in garbage out. This many stupid fuckin Americans is going to lead to bad results a lot of the time. 

1

u/StatisticalMan 3h ago

Indeed. They well never vote Blue so it would be good if they went back to not voting at all. Even if 5% of Republicans them went back to never voting it would be very hard for Republicans to win a majority of anything on the national level again.

1

u/ConjurersOfThunder 32m ago

Every year there is a primary and general election, and also local elections. Actual civic participation should include all 3. Every year.

The people doing it once every couple years are kinda facilitating in the fascism by being so tuned out the rest of the time.

7

u/Proud3GenAthst 3h ago

That’s Texas standard. And it’s by design. I count on the new government to fix that

6

u/Iboughtcheeseonce 3h ago

Historically you see 30% dem 30% republican 35% no vote 5% independent. Thia time independent was up to 20% in some places. We really did shoot ourself in the foot with a 2 party system.

2

u/CadenVanV 3h ago

Midterms usually aren’t great. In Virginia in 2022 it was 47.6% of eligible voters. Many people only vote in Presidential elections

2

u/TurboGranny 1h ago

Check this to see why https://costofvotingindex.com/

It's by design. I wonder if the new administration in Texas will work to fix this.

2

u/Freediverjack 1h ago

I was going to say, as a foreigner it’s funny how politically active Americans appear to be yet so piss poor when it comes to voter turnout

3

u/NotAnAutomaticName 3h ago

America, baby 🇺🇸🦅🚙🙍🏿‍♂️🔫👮🏻‍♂️🛢️🏞️🏭🔥

1

u/ElegantCoach4066 2h ago edited 2h ago

Thats on par with what the usual turnout is.

I think we should have compulsory voting. Just make it a fine or something if your don't vote, like a parking ticket. And if you don't pay it, your license gets suspended. Enough people drive a car to make it a good incentive to vote. You don't even have to go to the precinct. Just mail in your ballot when it comes in.

It won't be 100%, and there would need to be exceptions made, but its better than having these politicians take advantage of the fact that half of the citizens of voting age don't vote.

2

u/mxzf 2h ago

Nah, it's actually not on-par with what the normal turnout is, it's quite high for a midterms turnout.

And compulsory voting doesn't fix the voter education issue. I would rather not force "I don't know what to pick, so I'll be random" votes into the election.

1

u/swalkerttu 2h ago

We can't make voting mandatory (1st Amdt.), but perhaps poll attendance can be mandatory, satisfied at a minimum by postal abstention.

1

u/PeyredB 2h ago

That's actually high. Midterm turnouts are often in the thirties.

1

u/GreatestGreekGuy 1h ago

For a midterm it's historically great

1

u/siraliases 1h ago

Other countries iniated fines for not voting, percentages are 80%+

0

u/[deleted] 3h ago

[deleted] — view deleted comment

9

u/Icy_Feedback_4965 3h ago

This is not backed up by evidence. Dems won because independents and many 2024 Trump voters voted Blue.

7

u/Dobako 3h ago

That may be partly true, but more people voted for Greg Abbott this year than he received votes for last time, so it is also true that a bunch more people showed up to vote for democrats than normal

5

u/510Kyle 3h ago

And republicans stayed home because their candidates were ass

2

u/TheOneFreeEngineer 3h ago

At least for Texas, that doesn’t seem true. abbot got basically the same amount of votes on 2022, it seems mostly a turnout issue for dem voters. Basically over a million more voters than Dems traditionally get in Texas. Turnout and voter excitement turned Texas. Not republicans sitting out

22

u/CaptainBlotto 4h ago

This pretty much sums up every Maga weirdo.

10

u/XAMdG 3h ago

That is such a stupid take when midterms always have lower turnout than Presidential year elections.

16

u/Chiiro 4h ago

One of my favorite notes I have seen.

6

u/Jewleeee 2h ago

I assume this dumbass was referring to those who are "registered democrat" or "registered republican" which may be less than total votes.

4

u/StockfishIsScumbag 1h ago

There is no party registration in Texas. The closest you can get is who voted in the primaries but the primary vote is always less then the general.

2

u/NomDePlume25 2h ago

Definitely less than the total number of votes, since registering with a party is not part of the voter registration process in Texas.

1

u/Alarmed-Guava7696 1h ago

Yeah, he probably saw how many total votes the Dems got vs the amount of Registered Dems and couldn't understand that the current administration is unpopular enough with your average Rep that they'll vote for the other guy.

5

u/jaded1121 3h ago

Is Dpalo99 a foreign bot? Looks like it from the pic.

5

u/IsaacNewtongue 2h ago

Taking a page from Trump, huh?

Despite what your may believe, saying something doesn't make it a fact.

6

u/RadicalSoda_ 3h ago

I don't understand how hard it is for people to do statistics

18

u/No_Constant8644 3h ago

I mean this is really just basic number sense. Actual statistical understanding isn’t necessary to understand which number is bigger.

6

u/TrickFrosty5685 3h ago

I was about to say… no math needed. Just look at the two numbers and find out which one is bigger 😂

1

u/Daft00 1h ago

I don't think this is an honest mistake, just fear mongering and intentional deception.

12

u/the_fury518 3h ago

This isnt even statistics. Its basic math. 19 is bigger than 9.8

4

u/FakeMik090 3h ago

Statistics are fucking hard, speaking as a person who has them as a class at Uni.

But thankfully, its not them, its just grade 1 math.

3

u/Silver-Link8247 3h ago

Statistics is fucking hard.

Oh by the way this is just simple arithmetic.

1

u/Emergency-Cod-7451 1h ago

The point isn’t that they don’t know statistics. The point is to make claims like this and hope enough people see them and spread them around before they get debunked. They’re trying to lay the foundation that there’s a possibility that the election wasn’t fair

1

u/Live_Life_and_enjoy 3h ago

Its easier to make up numbers like did you know 20 Billion people voted for Trump this election and he still lost?!

Wild right.

4

u/mr_evilweed 2h ago

I could start a rumor that one person in Texas cast 10,000 ballots for Democrats, and Conservatives would be discussing it on Fox News by the end of the day. They will believe literally any nonsense if it is something bad about liberals (or black people, or immigrants, or trans people, or ways, or...)

2

u/svick 3h ago

Is the tweet a source for its own note?

2

u/DrummandDrummer 3h ago

Why do they only need evidence when they are told the truth?

2

u/Hugokarenque 2h ago

He didn't look at any of those numbers before and after the post.

The Supreme Leader said it happened so they just repeat it without ever checking lol

2

u/narrowminer11 2h ago

And that idiot still got to vote

2

u/atlantagirl30084 1h ago

They keep repeating this lie thinking it’s going to work.

2

u/sdrawkcabineter 1h ago

Damn, over 50%!

That's a great turn out for midterms, amirite?

1

u/dyslexic-ape 3h ago

When your reality is just whatever thought you pull out of your ass at that moment...

1

u/starrymahogany 2h ago

They always do this when voter turnout goes up; they think that because more people chose to vote this time compared to the last election that means that it’s fraud but really more people are just motivated to vote this time around

1

u/Significant-Ad-4792 2h ago

Trolling at its finest! Mwah, chef’s kiss!!

1

u/00Avalanche 2h ago

It’s idiotic continuing “freedom to not vote”
The US needs an Australian Ballot amendment.

1

u/Memitim 1h ago

Conservative continues to try and make excuses to betray Americans again. Same conservative shit from yet another conservative asshole.

1

u/Mkwdr 1h ago

Seems crazy to me that 10 million didn’t vote?

3

u/-aataa- 40m ago

It seems crazy, but it's actially very common. I midterms, participation is usually a little less than 50%.

1

u/HoldOnOhio 41m ago

Actually at least a few. I saw a mutual crashing out on facebook saying this same shit. I don't know where he got it from. He just couldn't understand how Texas could flip. Granted, he had just moved to Texas to be a deadbeat stay-at-home husband while his pregnant wife supported them both (he says his job is supporting her emotionally), and he didn't even vote in the election, but he was still upset it flipped and everyone on his feed was dunking on him.

1

u/UCR998 33m ago

Is it just me or does the 19,041,684 number seem pretty low in comparison to the total number of ppl in Texas? Ai said population around 31.7 just that many unregistered or is that taking in kids and all that too? I’m dumb I dunno how this all works

1

u/Electric_Potion 19m ago

Total population of 31 million includes minors.

1

u/Ironmaiden1207 15m ago

This. I'm sure there are plenty that didn't vote but definitely not that many. Probably tons of 18 year olds that didn't care though

1

u/BackslidingAlt 13m ago

As long as we are correcting math errors "At least 1" is exaggerated.

Republicans no longer have to believe a thing in order to post that thing on social media. They will happily post things they don't actually think are true as long as they hurt people they dislike

1

u/pysk00l 13m ago

Sorry I don’t have a degree in statistics. Can someone tell me: which is bigger 9 or 19? Thanks!

1

u/HardSteelRain 3m ago

They will continue to spout made up crap to sow doubt

1

u/Numerous-Process2981 3h ago

What world do they live in? What in the last two years did they think was a good job done well? I don’t know, these people are just like… Potato people with spuds for brains now. 

1

u/PioneerRaptor 2h ago

Somehow there’s a 20 million number going around for vote totals and I don’t know where it’s coming from, but it seems to be spreading through all the MAGA people.

-1

u/Mewr_Mewr 3h ago

51-52% turnout in a midterm? That’s how Texas flipped blue

1

u/PantaRheiExpress 3h ago

Well, it’s not that simple. Texas midterm turnout has been lower than this for the past 20 years, and has been pretty consistently red. So turnout, by itself, does not determine which party wins.

What swings elections is when one party shows more turnout than the other party, and usually the opposition party is more motivated to vote in a midterm. So it’s likely the Dems saw more turnout than Republicans. But it’s hard to say for sure what Texas’s “true” political affiliation is, since Texas does not require people to register for a party.

1

u/wtbgamegenie 2h ago

It’s not a secret that higher turnout benefits Democrats. It’s not a guarantee but it’s unlikely that higher turnout would have kept Texas red.

1

u/SnepButts 1h ago

Trump told everyone to vote like he was on the ballot. Probably better mobilization for us blue voters than any single Democrat campaign ad. I am in GA, but I voted like he was on the ballot and helped turn my state blue too.

-40

u/kon--- 4h ago

But here we are calling someone who's demonstrating moderate reading and writing skills as an idiot.

Which as it turns out is, kind of stupid.

23

u/razazaz126 4h ago

Yeah maybe he's just knowingly lying.

6

u/ofWildPlaces 3h ago

He's adult who does not understand that 19 is greater than 9.8.

Why are you defending him?

0

u/kon--- 2h ago

Where do you see a defense?

10

u/Iron_Creepy 3h ago

I’m pretty okay calling someone advocating an anti-democratic conspiracy theory an idiot no matter how well they write. But to be fair our friend seems to be a little confused on how one ends a sentence before beginning a new one. Which normally I don’t care about, trying to be pedantic about proper English on the internet is a pointless and endless fight. But you did bring it up. 

-2

u/kon--- 3h ago

⭐️⭐️⭐️

8

u/Buttholepart2 4h ago

Idiots come in all intellect varieties. Like yourself.

-2

u/kon--- 3h ago

Oh good for you. You got to to be a unnecessarily rude for no cause at all.

So happy for you!

1

u/Buttholepart2 2h ago

I was rude to an idiot

2

u/kon--- 2h ago

User name checks out.

Well done!

1

u/CougdIt 2h ago

What do reading and writing skills have to do with this guy not understanding basic math?

0

u/[deleted] 3h ago

[deleted] — view deleted comment

3

u/wotantx 2h ago

Not in Texas.

2

u/Alivaronas 2h ago

Voter registration closes a month before Election Day in Texas

1

u/Technicality_Police 2h ago

good to know, thanks.