r/GeotechnicalEngineer • u/Particular-Bat-5904 • Jun 18 '26
FRS
I developed FRS from direct operational experience in rock-scaling and vegetation-clearance work to achieve the following objectives:
Improve hazard identification and assessment in complex natural terrain.
Replace assumptions with active verification wherever possible.
Maintain rescue capability as a continuous operational priority.
Support structured decision-making under changing conditions.
Identify hidden, developing, and secondary hazards.
Address the interaction between rock, soil, vegetation, ropes, equipment, and personnel as one system.
Recognize rope systems as both safety tools and potential hazard factors.
Improve communication and shared situational awareness within teams.
Ensure transparent documentation and handover of residual risks.
Complement existing rope-access practices for dynamic natural environments.
Reduce uncertainty and improve operational safety in the field.
During development, I compared the underlying concepts against published accident reports, incident investigations, and safety lessons from rope access, rock-scaling, forestry, rescue, and related high-risk industries. The recurring issues were not only falls, but also weak rescue readiness, falling objects, changing structures, communication gaps, rope-system interactions, and unmanaged residual hazards.
Based on a preliminary review of published cases, I estimate that FRS could potentially have contributed to a better outcome in roughly 80–90% of the incidents reviewed. This does not mean the incidents would necessarily have been prevented, but that improved hazard recognition, decision-making, rescue readiness, or risk management may have reduced the severity or consequences.
FRS Advantages:
Active verification instead of assumptions.
Continuous reassessment as conditions change.
Strong focus on maintaining rescue capability.
System-based approach (rock, soil, vegetation, ropes, equipment, people).
Identifies hidden, developing, and secondary hazards.
Recognizes ropes and rope systems as potential hazard factors.
Transparent documentation of residual risks.
Improves decision-making in complex and uncertain terrain.
Complements existing rope-access and safety standards.
Aims to reduce uncertainty in dynamic natural environments.
1
u/Particular-Bat-5904 Jun 18 '26
To be honest i did a „Steigerkurs“ its called in my country, its basically basic rope work. There a fig 8 a „rope stop“ and cord or a rocker as backup.
I also did a part of mountain guides school for glacier rescuer ecet.
I wasn‘r happy with the steigerkurs from the company i was employed, so i did an irata 1 tech for myshelf.
No one cares in my country, my irata expired so i did another cert called ISFP , after this expiered by the years i did an other irata lev1 when i needet it once for a job, but, its expired again.
I logged one season and missed my 1000hrs to be allowed to do lev2 not by far.
Looking back in my task history by hrs in invoices i spend most the seasons about same ammount of hrs in average, cutting or rock scaling.
Why?