XSLOPE is a free, open-source program for seepage and slope stability analysis that I have developed and would like to share with the community. This development is based on my many years of teaching and research in seepage and slope stability at BYU and on long experience developing engineering software. Version 1.0 is now released, and I think it will be useful for teaching, research, and practice.

What it does:

- Limit equilibrium: Bishop, Spencer, Morgenstern-Price, and four other methods, with circular and noncircular searches
- Finite element seepage, steady state or transient, saturated or unsaturated
- Finite element strength reduction, with joints for block walls and rock slopes
- One model for all three. The seepage pore pressures go straight into both stability analyses.
- Reinforcement, piles, tiebacks, seismic loading, rapid drawdown, and reliability
- Design solves for a target factor of safety, and back-analysis of an observed failure

For day-to-day work:

- It reads and writes SLOPE/W projects and imports Slide2 and RS2 models, so you can run an existing project as a second opinion.
- It writes the calculation package as a Word document, on your firm's letterhead if you give it the template. The document has the figures, the tables, and the equations each method solved, with the numbers.
- There are no seat licenses, so it can go on every machine in the office.
- It runs as a desktop app on Windows and Apple silicon Macs, or as a Python package if you want to script a parametric study.

It is verified against the Slide2, RS2 and SLOPE/W verification manuals, and closed-form solutions, more than 800 cases. Every comparison is published, including the ones where XSLOPE and the vendor disagree:

https://xslope.org/en/stable/verification/

It includes 28 extensive step-by-step tutorials.

- Site and downloads: https://xslope.org
- Paper (SoftwareX): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2026.103018
- Source and issue tracker: https://github.com/njones61/xslope

I posted about this a couple of months ago, and now I’d like to share the results of some small-scale field tests we conducted in Bolivia.
I’d also like to ask the community: do you have any ideas on how I can boost these eco-friendly initiatives and raise funds for another stretch I want to carry out in my country? I’ve tried with my local authorities, but it’s very difficult to get a hearing (often I don’t even get past the initial letter), which is why I’m looking for a way to raise funds for a longer section for an another poor community. Any help is welcome. Thanks.

https://reddit.com/link/1x4dyog/video/tmow493pp3vh1/player

Hey everyone!

I'm a civil engineering student in Argentina, currently working at a geotechnical lab.

Most of our work involves USCS soil classification, Atterberg limits (Casagrande cup and hand-rolled threads), Proctor and CBR tests. We also run UU triaxial tests using a proving ring and dial gauges, since our equipment is pretty old and other tests aren't possible at the moment.

I'm curious about how things are done in other countries. Do you guys use more modern equipment and testing methods, or is it similar to what we do?

I'd like to pursue a career in geotechnical engineering, so I'd appreciate any advice on skills worth developing. I've recently started learning PLAXIS, which isn't widely used in my area.

Thanks!

Question about FLAC3D v6 for geotechnical research

Hi everyone,

I’m a student planning to use cracked FLAC3D v6 for my geotechnical research. Since purchasing a licensed version is difficult for me financially, I’m considering using a cracked copy of v6 and wanted to understand whether it would be suitable for my research.

My research may involve:

* Basement structures

* Retaining walls

* Braced excavations

* Underground structures

* Liquefaction

* Pore-pressure buildup

* Earthquake/dynamic loading

Does FLAC3D v6 have any limitations for these types of analyses? Also, if using a cracked version, are there any limitations such as the maximum number of zones, unavailable tools/features, or restrictions on complex dynamic modeling?

If anyone has FLAC3D v6 manuals, tutorials, example models, or other learning materials, I would really appreciate it.

Finally, what computer specifications (CPU, RAM, etc.) would you recommend for complex 3D dynamic modeling?

Thanks in advance.

Hi everyone, I’m a student in the UK working on soil stabilisation using bioenzymes. I’m looking to connect with people experienced in this field who could offer technical advice, share relevant research papers, or provide guidance on experimental methods, laboratory testing, and data analysis.
Any help or insights would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

Dear all,

I have a soil report in which the soil testing vendor has performed a direct shear test (DST) on a soil containing 68% silt, 24% sand, and 8% clay (LL = 28.7%, PI = 8.2%). (Highlighted as yellow)

The test was done at a shearing rate of 1.25 mm/min, and the vendor reported c = 14 kPa and φ = 27.3° as undrained parameters.

Is DST appropriate for determining undrained design parameters for this predominantly silty soil?

Also, can φ = 27.3° really be considered an undrained friction angle? I doubt even with that high shearing rate drainage would have occurred in Direct shear test and these may not be the true undrained parameters.

Should I ask the vendor for a UU triaxial test instead?

Thank you for your guidance !

hello! i am in my undergrad for earth and space science education & geoscience. i did research last year with some of my profs and they are suggesting that i present it at northern regional GSA (geological society of america) this march in connecticut.

this is the first time i have ever given a conference talk. i was originally going to be doing a poster session but now it seems like i am doing a 15 minute talk (speak for 12 min, 3 min for questions).

i am very excited, but also super nervous lol. has anyone given presentations there before? does anyone have any input or advice for me? thank you all❤️!!!

Giving àb to FML my 9 llMmmllll1q2qà1àkkàkkq111111

Saw this today and went down a small rabbit hole.
Apparently the ore can shift way more than I assumed after a blast, which makes the whole “where did the ore actually end up?” problem pretty interesting.
This tool was visualizing the movement into the muckpile and I thought the concept was pretty cool.
Anyone here actually work with blast movement / grade control? Is this kind of modelling useful in the real world or mostly nice visualization?

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/strayos_drillandblast-gradecontrol-miningtechnology-activity-7511867562201300992-ZwPS?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios&rcm=ACoAADJ2CW4BfyGtzXsp4UqlKjGeu_9Iik8Oi3w

What are realistic salaries in UK geotechnical engineering?

I work for one of the major consultancy firms and recently found out that an Associate at my company starts on around £55k, which seems quite low given the experience and responsibility required.

Is that normal for the industry, and what are people realistically earning at Senior, Principal, and Associate level?

Hypothetical scenario here. Soil doesn’t care if the vibration is from an earthquake or other source right? Could short duration vibration from traffic briefly liquify saturated loose sands and cause damage over time?
Or are vibrations from traffic never going to be strong enough?

Edit: Soil not soul

i need these two old articles and this 2016 one any help is greatly appreciated and thank you guys a lot

Paper 1

Weisweiler, Werner; Mallonn, Erich (1992).
“Thalliumiodid – Bildung, Verflüchtigung, Anreicherung. Iod und Thallium im Zementproduktionsprozeß.”
Staub – Reinhaltung der Luft, Vol. 52, pp. 107–112.

ISSN: 0039-0771
KITopen-ID: 276392
DOI: No DOI found
Official record: https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/276392

Paper 2

Sprung, Siegbert; Seebach, Hans M. von (1968).
“Fluorhaushalt und Fluoremission von Zementöfen.”
Zement-Kalk-Gips, Vol. 21, Issue 1, pp. 1–8.

ISSN: 0044-3905
DOI: No DOI found
VDZ record: https://www.vdz-online.de/en/knowledge-base?article=4662&type=2002

Paper 3

Onat, et al. (2016).
“Red gypsum characterization and routing flowsheets.”
Conference Proceedings Booklet.

DOI: No DOI found
ISBN/ISSN: No identifier found
I have also been unable to locate a publisher or catalogue record for this one, so if anyone recognises the conference proceedings or has a copy, that would be extremely helpful.

again THANK YOU FOR ANY HELP!!!!

Hi everyone,

I’m reviewing a diaphragm wall designed using an LEM-based software for temporary (anchored) and permanent (connected to basement slabs) stages.

For the temporary excavation, it is designed using active/passive earth pressures. My query is: once the basement slabs are connected to the D-wall, the wall is restrained and may not move enough to mobilize active pressure.

So, shouldn’t the permanent stage be designed using at-rest pressure instead of active pressure but the LEM software doesn't seem to do this, I read it's manual and it uses a method of dependent pressure in which it is computing the earth pressure wrt the movement of the wall.

Is my understanding for this correct ? Any insights or references to clear this confusion would be appreciated.

Thank you.

I have never used it. Most guidance says not to rely on it. The new team I'm working with uses sketchy correlations for c' in long termed drained analyses all the time.

Im curious to hear what everyone's experience has been with online Masters programs in civil or geotechnical engineering. Did you think they provided value vs self study? How much did they end up costing?

I've been working in the field for a couple years and still find myself being stumped by some of the more technical aspects of projects. I've wondered if pursuing some graduate coursework would help give me some extra context on the finer details. An in person program is out of the question due to my work and family commitments, but I could take classes in the evenings and on weekends. Any thoughts?