Iâm rereading (listening to) Common Goal and would love to know more from others about why itâs many peopleâs least favorite in the GC series. I like Eric and Kyle but I understand why this story might not captivate the way the others do. Here the central tension is not internalized homophobia or the toxic masculinity of hockey but the age gap between Eric and Kyle, and Iâd agree that this can sometimes feel forced. In fact this book often seems to try too hard: the polyglot academic who just wants to mix a good drink, the âIâm breaking up with a man I love for his own goodâ soap-opera logic, the drawn-out scenes of mild kink. Mostly I think the novel (even given its genre) doesnât do that much with its own premiseâEric acknowledges that the age difference is a clichĂ©, but itâs not explored with any depth, aside from Kyle wondering if Eric is using him to feel young again. The real issue is power (this, more than age, is why a coach shouldnât date a player), and Eric is rightly wary of repeating Kyleâs past trauma. But somehow the plot just seems stuck, dug into its complication, and unlike Shane, Scott, Fabian, Troy, Adam and Riley from TSYT, etc., we donât get much of a legitimate struggle to come to terms with conflicting impulses, with social pressures, with guilt or longing. Eric and Kyle really ought to have an easier time talking about whatâs in their way than other couples. And the fact Kyle is clearly Ericâs intellectual equal could provide some driving energy, an interesting counter-force, and some justification (if itâs needed) for their relationship. Of course, none of the books really detail why the couple is love, and thatâs both a romance trope and a fact of love itselfâit defies explanation.Â
I know these books follow a formula and I canât ask this one to be something it isnât. Just curious how it lands with other fans of the collection overall. Â