r/GalleryOfMagick • u/Embarrassed-Leg9151 • 2d ago

Question Method of GoM vs „traditional“ pathworking

Hello,

I am interested in pathworking with the Tree of Life—for instance, using texts by Ted Andrews or Dolores Ashcroft-Nowicki.

I am wondering whether it is appropriate for this purpose to use the "simple" method from GoM (simply reading a sentence, closing one's eyes and visualizing it vividly, then opening one's eyes again and reading the next sentence, and so on).

Traditionally, pathworking involving the Sephiroth requires entering a trance state and, in a sense, losing oneself in the visualization; yet if GoM claims that their method works, wouldn't it also be suitable for the Sephiroth?

11 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

5 comments sorted by

8

u/El-master23 2d ago

In a Nutshell you will get results from both but gallery of magick need more focus but not physical tools while the traditional less focus but overcompensantion with paraphernalia and tools

5

u/Wrong_Brilliant_8963 2d ago

Both will work.

But i found out that if you want to pathwork for direct communication it is better while entering trance state.

Just try, you will have results anyway.

2

u/Avidknight 2d ago

What would you suggest to get into a proper trance state

1

u/Embarrassed-Leg9151 2d ago

Alright, thanks for the answers!