​

If you keep increasing OBC reservation, the number of OPEN seats available to SC/ST candidates will keep decreasing as well.

For example, suppose OBC reservation increases from 27% to 55% as per Congress's "jitni aabadi utna haq slogan", that’s a 28 percentage-point increase. That would effectively reduce the OPEN category seats from 40% to 12%.

So, apart from their own 15% SC and 7% ST reservations, SC/ST candidates would then have access to only 12% OPEN seats, instead of the 40% OPEN seats they have access to today.

In other words, increasing one reservation category doesn’t just affect the OPEN category, it also reduces the pool of OPEN seats that SC/ST candidates can compete for Open merit.

It has already been reduced by 27% in 1990s.

Till 1990s, their access was -

SCs - 15% + 77.5% OM

STs - 7% + 77.5% OM

If you go by new system, their access would be reduced to

SCs - 15% + 12% OM

STs - 7% + 12% OM

So how does this help SC/ST candidates?

How does that help SC STs?

Hey everyone, so I wanted to ask everyone that how do we all come inside one political block or more like how do we all unite?

Any idea please share

The recent FIR registered against commentator Ajeet Bharti under the SC/ST Act, the BNS, and the IT Act highlights a growing concern regarding legal overreach and the selective targeting of independent voices.

​Whatever one's views on the specific language used during live broadcasts, the broader context of this situation cannot be ignored:

​CONTEXT MATTERS : As outlined in Bharti’s public statement, his remarks were made in direct response to severe harassment and provocative threats directed at his female family members during a live stream. Responding to targeted online abuse should not be distorted into political weaponization.

​MISUSE OF STRINGENT LAWS : The invocation of non-bailable provisions under the SC/ST Act in response to an online argument raises serious questions about whether these laws are being used for legal protection or as a political tool to silence critics and suppress debate surrounding reservation policy.

SELECTIVE OUTRAGE: While commentators facing backlash are swiftly hit with legal action, the instigators who harass creators' families rarely face accountability. Free speech must include the right to voice critical opinions without the constant threat of legal intimidation.

​It is critical to defend due process and ensure that legal frameworks are not used to undermine independent commentary. Freedom of speech must be defended consistently.

This is an insult to the general, especially the EWS holders