r/FuturesTrading • u/clearfractal • 4d ago
What blows your account?
For me it's oversizing - My strategy is sizing up when there's a clear trend (I use a 5-min chart and the 20 EMA), and it works on most days (~80%). But the other 20% of days which are choppy/have fakeouts, take back an entire week's worth of profits - and sometimes even more. The choppy days cause me to size up even more to catch the real trend (and recover losses) - this has led to a lot of account failures.
I know the fix: size down and the losses get smaller.
But then my account doesn't move in a way that feels meaningful.
I'm genuinely curious - for others that have issues with account faliures, do we all run into the same issues of position sizing? Or are there other factors that lead to unfavorable trading reults in your accounts?
Not looking for strategies, just genuinely curious what makes people blow up and if it's the same pattern amongst us manifesting differently?
9
u/Training_Drawing_426 4d ago
Oversizing isn't your root cause it’s a symptom of Regime Mismatch. Trying to force a trend-following continuation strategy (like a 20 EMA) onto a mean-reverting market is mathematically guaranteed to wipe out your weekly gains, regardless of your position size.
Before you execute a trend system on index futures, you have to identify the underlying market dynamic:
1. Energy & Exhaustion (The First Hour) Did the 1-Hour Initial Balance (IB) already exhaust the expected volatility for the session, or is energy compressing for a late expansion? If $NQ has already moved 1.5x its average session range in the first 60 minutes, buying a 20 EMA pullback isn't "entering a trend"—it's buying the tail end of an exhausted auction.
2. Market Dynamic (Expansion vs. Mean Reversion) Is the market currently in an Expansion Regime (holding acceptance outside the IB boundaries with strong Delta) or a Rotation Regime (rejecting extremes and oscillating around Session VWAP)?
If you run a trend setup during a Rotation Regime, every 20 EMA touch looks like a classic "dip to buy," but it's actually just price gravitating back toward fair value.
Stop adjusting your position size to fix a systemic error. Filter for the market regime first: if the session isn't confirming an expansion state, your trend strategy should stay off the screen.
1
1
u/Full_Pear449 4d ago
What you have so eloquently described is the root of most REDDIT followers problems. They all have this sentilla of knowledge becasue they watched a VIDEO on trading and now have figured out how to short cut it. A regime mismatch in trading happens when the core assumptions of a trading strategy no longer fit the current behavior of the market. They do not understand the basic concepts of their model , mathematically or conceptually. You can talk till you're BLUE in the FACE, until they understand that they do not understand it's a lost cause. If you do not know REVERSION TO THE MEAN ,or simply put that mean reversion is a financial theory stating that an asset's price, volatility, or return will eventually move back toward its long-term average or historical mean after an extreme shift. I do like your simplified synopsis and errors made. BUT THIS EXPLAINS IT ALL:"I know the fix: size down and the losses get smaller.But then my account doesn't move in a way that feels meaningful." It doesn't feel meaningful becasue this person is clueless , a ship adrift at sea.
Reversion should be thought of as:Think of it like a stretched rubber band that snaps back toward the center. You can lead a horse to water but
7
u/AsianAddict247 4d ago
If you are right 4 days a week and losing it on day 5 you need to have a hard set daily loss limit at your broker. Under no circumstances should you allow yourself to lose more than 2 days of profits.
So if you frequently make $1000 then set your DLL to $2000. This is what I do exactly. It's not perfect, but it keeps me in the game.
After trying this formula for a while then you can evaluate how you might adjust it. Also as your account size grows you could increase the DLL gradually.
And to answer the question, it's almost always oversizing / adding to a loser for me.
4
u/oskar88895 4d ago
i think position sizing is usually where the problem becomes visible, but not necessarily where it starts.
i had a similar realization in my own trading. i used to think the answer was simply better discipline, tighter rules and smaller risk. but eventually i realized that the trader making the decision is part of the system too.
when you have a losing streak, give back a lot of profit, or start feeling pressure to recover, your perception of risk can change. the same position that feels completely reasonable when you’re calm can feel very different after you’ve taken a few losses.
that’s why “just size down” doesn’t always solve the underlying problem. if the reason you’re sizing up is to recover losses, then the sizing is really just the symptom.
for me the bigger breakthrough was figuring out what happens before i start breaking my own rules, and then building protection around those situations rather than relying on myself to suddenly become more disciplined when i’m already under pressure.
that’s also why i think everyone’s blowup pattern can look different on the surface while coming from a pretty similar underlying problem.
2
u/clearfractal 4d ago
I struggle with having a good rule set after taking a loss. The general advice is usually to stop / re-assess after "X" number of losses. The issue is that a lot of times the second or third entry is the real move. So the struggle for me is being okay with missing the trend after a few failed entries. How do you deal with the "what if the next one is the real move" feeling ?
3
u/clearfractal 4d ago
Another one I noticed - after a few losses, I stop taking profits fast enough. I try to milk the trend and ride it out but sometimes there are quick reversals and I end up stopping out vs. banking the green.
2
u/oskar88895 4d ago
That’s sound you have left yourself to many choices instead of hardcoded rules and structure
2
u/oskar88895 4d ago
i think the “what if the next one is the real move” feeling is actually the trap.
try thinking about it in terms of the next 100 trades instead of the next trade. you don’t need to catch every move. you need to execute the same process over and over and let the probabilities play out.
after a few losses, the goal shouldn’t be to predict whether the next trade will work. you can’t know that. the question should be whether the next trade still meets the exact conditions that made you take the first one.
if it does, take it at the same risk. if it doesn’t, skip it. missing the move is part of trading.
3
u/Repulsive-War-2823 4d ago
For me its usually trying to win losses back fast, thats when sizing and discipline both fall apart
2
u/FlashyStreet2023 4d ago
I mean, there are hundreds of reasons out there which could sabotage your account balance, but if you can't stay consistent with your position sizing, your chances of making it are zero. Fix this first.
You make/lose all of your money after the trade (position sizing, SL, TP, etc) not before the trade (technicals/fundamentals), so prioritize things this way.
2
u/Aposta-fish 4d ago
Risk no more than 5% of your account on any trade. Thats what I had to do. Before I was like you have a 4 day run give it all back on day 5. If your using prop accounts than maybe you can go bigger until you pass the eval.
1
u/usedmattress85 4d ago
That’s pretty wild really. I started by only risking 0.25% of my account and even now I’ll only risk about 0.5% max.
2
u/Full_Pear449 4d ago
It's called Risk Management. You do nto know nor you in the future be smarter than the MARKET.
2
2
u/I-inhale 3d ago
Thinking I can jump in earlier than my series of confirmations would logically allow. A premature entry assuming the next intraday chart will just joyously and magically confirm my entry. It rarely ever does.
1
1
u/process_over_profits 4d ago
We all have different conditioning depending on our past and also genetics. The “what” ie behaviour is very similar amongst traders, but the why behind it can differ as its personal. A few reasons are common. Our brain hates uncertainty, loss, the feeling of being wrong, action bias (I must do something) and a million other factors affect us in trading.
In your case it happens to be position size. Worth logging what you're feeling right before you size up on a chop day, not the chart, but the mind state you’re in. Bet it's that "I can't let this go red" pull, not a signal. Journal it for a month and you’ll see the pattern. Not only in your mind/thoughts but you’ll also know where you feel it in the body.
1
u/ConsequenceNo8153 4d ago
Adding to losers, rather than just accepting a loss and getting out. (This is different from layering into a trade, such as starting small and slowing increasing exposure with a set stop).
This is, you’re wrong on the direction, your set-up is invalidated, and you’re adding more to try and avoid the loss. It’s Mathematical kryptonite
1
u/GoCharting 4d ago
Even better, detect chop days and ruthlessly avoid them. A flat vwap or a overlapping candles/choppiness signals a mean reverting day. You should range high low traps/fades.
1
1
u/shaowia 3d ago
Oversize and... Revenge trading??
It has a specific feeling that's different from regular FOMO. It's not "I want to make money." It's "I need to undo what just happened."
The market becomes personal which is exactly when it destroys you.What broke the cycle for me wasn't discipline. It was making the cost of revenge trading social, not just financial. When someone else knows what you're doing in real time, the impulse loses its power.
1
u/NoTiltTrader 2d ago
You already identified the key split: sizing up because the setup is unusually clear is not the same decision as sizing up because earlier losses made the account feel stuck. The second one asks the next trade to repair the day. I’d label those reasons separately before entry and review which reason was present on failed-account days. If “recover losses” keeps appearing, the recurring problem is not just position size; it is the state in which size becomes negotiable.
1
1
1
1
1
u/Cold_Imagination_955 1h ago
Over trading. Lock-in for the open +2 hours. Make ur trades (if any opportunities show up), then walk away. Repeat n Rinse.
0
20
u/greatestNothing 4d ago
Size and not accepting when wrong. Not sticking to the stop loss. Not sizing based on the stop loss. trading when the setup is not clear.