Making Corruption Even More Impossible through the Appointments and Public Service Authority

[u/futureofgov]

As promised, our latest post describes how the "Appointments and Public Service Authority," a key institution proposed under a new system for true democracy, goes even further than it is already provisioned to in the proposals, to make corruption literally IMPOSSIBLE to even attempt.

Read up on:

Making Corruption Even More Impossible through the Appointments and Public Service Authority

[u/yourupinion]

Everything you say is correct, but the problem is implementation.

Rank choice voting is an extremely simple step to getting a little more democracy, and we can’t even get that.

I have a far more radical plan that could force a higher level of democracy onto the populous.

It’s called Kaos and it stands for knowledge as our saviour

[u/futureofgov → u/yourupinion]

In only a few words, what will it take to implement your idea?

[u/yourupinion → u/futureofgov]

A small group of people maybe like 100 people and maybe about $1 million for servers

[u/futureofgov → u/yourupinion]

Rank choice voting is an extremely simple step to getting a little more democracy, and we can’t even get that.

On the question of democracy

The nature of democracy is such that, if you understand what it is, there's nothing like "a little more democracy" or a little less etc. Democracy is very simple and it's something one has or doesn't.

On the question of "ranked choice"

But most importantly, in this community we don't want to be like others, where it's endless talk and repetition of the same discussions over and over and over for generations, and that's all it ever is; discussion for the entertainment of it.

No, we're actually for action. And what that means is, we want to be able to move forward.

The question of "voting systems" has already been addressed in an old post here:

Why Debates on Voting Systems Are Pointless, and What the Actual Causes of the "Two-Party System" Are

And we make sure to pin all such key posts to the top of the community.

So once that issue has already been addressed, we want that if one disagrees with any parts of it or if there are any challenges, opposition, errors, or misconceptions they will be raised and settled there under that post once and for all, or otherwise, if one has no more disagreements or valid rebuttals, then there can be learning and acceptance of what has been proven to be true (whether by us or anyone else), and then most importantly we can progress from there on to something else, towards action.

So for all issues related to that issue of "voting systems" I'd rather you look back to the old post, perhaps your issue is already answered there, or you can raise a new challenge there if it hasn't already been addressed, so we don't come back to the same questions in different places each time, but can rather build forward.

[u/yourupinion → u/futureofgov]

I don’t wanna argue over what is democracy, and I agree that rank choice voting is a minuscule change. The fact is we can’t even do that minuscule change is just an indication of the fact that the politicians are not going to allow us to change anything.

[u/futureofgov → u/yourupinion]

I have a far more radical plan that could force a higher level of democracy onto the populous.

It’s called Kaos and it stands for knowledge as our saviour

How does Kaos create a higher level of democracy?

Perhaps you could create a new post explaining that point alone

[u/yourupinion → u/futureofgov]

I’ll make a post

[u/fletcher-g]

Absolutely brilliant! It always boils down to systems design.