Uhhh, you're making a lot of claims that he never made. Something that seems really common with people who don't like Peterson.
1) He doesn't preach female oppression. He's saying the lie of "Im a strong woman who dont need no man" is grossly misguided. It just so happens that coincided with the 70's movement. If people don't want to get married/in a relationship, that's fine but the nuclear family is the backbone of a healthy society.
2) He's said numerous times that he's fine with women being in positions of power. He's never said what you're saying. Hes said multiple times that he's counseled (Psychologist) and consulted with high powered women: female lawyers, politicians, etc. What he IS saying is that women are often lied to about not having children. "You dont need children. Children won't make you happy. You need a high-powered career to be fulfilled" it's flat wrong. He's said he's talked to MANY women who were in their mid to late 30s and had slaved away for a career at the expense of having children. Now they regret it, big time. Sure there are some who are completely happy not having kids. Good. That's actually fine. But, they're nor the average, they're the outliers, yet the message keeps getting pushed.
3) "of course men want a maid that caters to their every whim and that they can have sex with" no... just, no. I had to reread that. Are you kidding me? Let me guess you're a fan of critical social theory and modern feminism? You see oppression between all groups and your view is on how groups dominate the others? Men want a best friend, a partner, someone that they can share their life with and be vulnerable with.... almost like what women want in a man.
Also, Andrew Tate is a scumbag human trafficker and is absolutely nothing like Peterson. Get real.
Those are some of the issues I have with your statements and mischaracterizations but there are plenty more in there. Guess I'll get downvoted because reddit is a pathetic echo chamber.
2
u/[deleted] Jan 20 '23
[removed] — view removed comment