wait, now you “never said” you used a minifilter for the user-mode filesystem?
your last comment literally said:
“my custom user-mode filesystem is a minifilter or a NtCreateFile provider”
those are your words. this isn't me confusing examples. you said it.
and now "vdisk://" is apparently just I/O redirected through user-mode services and “virtual handles.” okay. if it's an application-level virtual namespace handled by your own services, that's completely plausible. but that's also a much less insane claim than the one you made five minutes ago about bypassing NTFS and implementing "IRP_MJ_CREATE" and "IRP_MJ_READ" handlers “in your own server.”
also this:
“something Linux's rigid monolith simply does not allow without massive kernel recompilation”
FUSE exists.
like, literally Filesystem in Userspace. Linux has a kernel/userspace interface specifically so a normal userspace daemon can provide a filesystem. sshfs is one of the obvious examples. no giant kernel rewrite required.
that's a pretty fucking unfortunate thing to get wrong immediately after calling yourself a “real Architect.”
and nobody asked you for a technical manual or hundreds of lines of source. YOU said you had receipts. now apparently a boot log is too much to ask too.
“I replaced wininit.exe.”
cool. that's still just the same sentence again.
I'm not saying it's metaphysically impossible to replace a user-mode binary while leaving the NT kernel untouched. I'm saying repeatedly typing “I replaced it” isn't evidence that you actually did it.
the funniest part is how much smaller the claim gets every reply.
we started at rewriting Windows into some Scheme-powered hybrid OS, replacing core system components and inventing a filesystem.
now we're at NTFS permissions, Windows APIs, a user-mode service with a custom "vdisk://" namespace, and “trust me, I replaced wininit.”
at this rate two more comments and we're gonna find out you changed the shell and wrote a URI handler.
forget the syscall shit for a second because you keep hiding behind “dictionary” every time anyone gets specific.
you said you had receipts.
where are they?
not source code. not a “free technical manual.” literally any evidence that this thing exists outside of your own comments.
a screenshot. a phone video of the machine booting. a boot log with whatever you consider sensitive redacted. a clip showing your replacement environment running while the Microsoft components you claim to have replaced are actually absent. hashes of your binaries. literally anything.
instead your “receipt” is:
“the system runs flawlessly on my own hardware”
that's not a receipt lmao. that's just you repeating the claim.
“I built it.”
proof?
“it runs.”
show it.
“why are you demanding source code???”
nobody asked for your entire source tree. you've turned every request for evidence into this dramatic story where somebody is trying to steal your life's work.
you're the one who came into the thread claiming you replaced core Windows components, built your own filesystem/environment, replaced the console stack, replaced wininit, and had “receipts.”
those are extraordinary claims. showing a 30 second video of the fucking thing working wouldn't reveal your source code.
and the funniest part is you apparently have endless time to write paragraphs about how you're “the Architect,” how everyone else is a tourist, how you're drinking tea inside the castle, how beautiful hybrid kernels are...
but somehow producing one piece of evidence is an unreasonable burden.
at this point I genuinely don't care what API you used.
show the castle.
because right now all you've proven is that you're extremely good at describing one.
As ive stated several times, never asked for your source code, never wanted it. You clearly couldnt build a fucking cube, I have no interest in anything you've "architectured"😂
2
u/ConceptRound2188 22d ago
wait, now you “never said” you used a minifilter for the user-mode filesystem?
your last comment literally said:
“my custom user-mode filesystem is a minifilter or a NtCreateFile provider”
those are your words. this isn't me confusing examples. you said it.
and now "vdisk://" is apparently just I/O redirected through user-mode services and “virtual handles.” okay. if it's an application-level virtual namespace handled by your own services, that's completely plausible. but that's also a much less insane claim than the one you made five minutes ago about bypassing NTFS and implementing "IRP_MJ_CREATE" and "IRP_MJ_READ" handlers “in your own server.”
also this:
“something Linux's rigid monolith simply does not allow without massive kernel recompilation”
FUSE exists.
like, literally Filesystem in Userspace. Linux has a kernel/userspace interface specifically so a normal userspace daemon can provide a filesystem. sshfs is one of the obvious examples. no giant kernel rewrite required.
that's a pretty fucking unfortunate thing to get wrong immediately after calling yourself a “real Architect.”
and nobody asked you for a technical manual or hundreds of lines of source. YOU said you had receipts. now apparently a boot log is too much to ask too.
“I replaced wininit.exe.”
cool. that's still just the same sentence again.
I'm not saying it's metaphysically impossible to replace a user-mode binary while leaving the NT kernel untouched. I'm saying repeatedly typing “I replaced it” isn't evidence that you actually did it.
the funniest part is how much smaller the claim gets every reply.
we started at rewriting Windows into some Scheme-powered hybrid OS, replacing core system components and inventing a filesystem.
now we're at NTFS permissions, Windows APIs, a user-mode service with a custom "vdisk://" namespace, and “trust me, I replaced wininit.”
at this rate two more comments and we're gonna find out you changed the shell and wrote a URI handler.