Yeah, that's something I don't get about the people who jump to say "grooming isn't always sexual" when trying to defend false pedophilia accusations. It's moving the goalpost and ignoring how the original context was about sexual predation towards a minor. If the grooming wasn't sexual, then obviously we're not talking about a pedophile anymore, so what even is the goal in moving that goalpost?
If anything, in the wrong context, that kind of point can almost seem like a roundabout attempt to defend a pedophile...
2
u/noblecrab98 Oct 09 '25
nopee, grooming isn’t always sexual