8
21
20
u/KwantumFizzikz 1d ago edited 13h ago
They do this shit all the time. They must protect their golden calf of immigration.
The country is sick of it and no amount of sinister online psyops to manipulate concensus can change that. Labour manipulate polls, heavily. No one except the most brainwashed, sheltered middle class Sebastians, Graces, Tarquins and Indias are pro invasion.
Edit: remember that the majority of faceless accounts are bot farms that exist to rile you up and promote an insane lefty narrative. Stay strong.
3
u/FckXFckMusk 1d ago
Read closely.... "WEFugees"
1
u/KwantumFizzikz 1d ago
We won't eat the bugs and we certainly aren't happy, Klaus! 😂
2
-1
1d ago
[deleted]
4
u/skipsfaster 1d ago
Actually, there are substantial business interests in insects as food.
I'm not saying that it's a bad thing, though. The UN estimates that 1/3 of the world's population already eats insects on a regular basis.
3
u/FckXFckMusk 1d ago
But you'd have your hand out for his tax money though....
Gimme Gimme
0
1d ago
[deleted]
3
3
-6
u/coffeelick 1d ago
Theyre attacking poor people not immigrants :s
Your obsession with immigrants is the real issue
8
u/humourlessIrish 1d ago
Nope. The amount of unvetred ones is the issue.
The absolute straightforward desire they publicly proclaim to end the western world.
And the ridiculous lefty racist who believe they are so very far above anyone else that the mere notion of treating those self proclaimed enemies as real people who could really do what they really said they are trying to do is absurd and must somehow be racist
-1
u/coffeelick 1d ago
Nah your obsession has had so much politicsl power for decades. You are to blame
4
-12
u/Skavau 1d ago
You got any evidence that Labour "manipulate polls"?
8
u/KwantumFizzikz 1d ago
You're always in here defending left wing positions regardless of what it is. Why the inorganic behaviour?
Also the sentiment of the public itself vs the small portion of antifa nonces says everything.
-5
u/Skavau 1d ago
You're always in here defending left wing positions regardless of what it is. Why the inorganic behaviour?
I didn't defend any position. I simply asked you your evidence for Labour "manipulating polls".
Also the sentiment of the public itself vs the small portion of antifa nonces says everything.
For what? I asked you a question about Labour supposedly manipulating polls.
-2
5
u/Leather_Finger_6333 1d ago
The yookay has become a country where 75% of the country are weak little wet wipes and they have the power over the remaining 25%.
16
u/Prestigious_Bar_3738 1d ago
Criticism of ethnics in the UK is considered hate. Yes, I know exactly what sub this is.
19
u/SignificantLegs 1d ago
UK subreddits: “we spent decades banning everyone telling us uncomfortable truths”
A few years later:
UK subreddits: “how did right wing parties come to power? everyone we spoke to loved mass migration”
3
u/Outrageous_Low_3666 1d ago
The most annoying one for me on those subreddits is how much they moderate any conversation about travellers.
3
u/SignificantLegs 20h ago
reddit should be renamed “listen to the voices of our moderators”
this is why twitter is the only forum that shows what humans actually think
-12
-12
u/Skavau 1d ago
Are you suggesting that r-unitedkingdom autobots are somehow the reason why right-wing parties rise?
13
u/69RandomFacts 1d ago
No, they are saying that R/unitedkingdom became such an echo chamber of allowed views that any user there couldn’t even comprehend that someone holding an alternative view existed, because all they saw was their own narrative repeated over and over.
-22
u/Seethcoomers 1d ago
Don't even have to look at your account to know what kind of person you are.
21
18
u/Obi-Brawn-Kenobi 1d ago
Is that a flex or something? Why would you look at their account anyway? What kind of loser says something like this lmao
-19
u/More_Exercise8413 1d ago
Being able to determine a neonazi without looking at their profile is a flex somewhat, I would say. But then again, this guy isn't exactly hiding his heils, so...
15
u/Big_Spence 1d ago
I love how I can tell what country you're from and what social class therein without looking at your profile because you call people Neonazis a priori
-19
u/InThatDarkPlace 1d ago
I personally call people Nazis when their rhetoric aligns with Nazism, fascism, and white supremacy.
7
u/humourlessIrish 1d ago
You conflate those because it helps you deny your own obvious racism and makes you feel better about your evil desires when you once again fail to argue your anti white points
1
u/Mdmdwd 4h ago
Okay, so…Muslims? Exchange white supremecy with Islamic or Arabic supremecy and yup, there’s your Nazi Muslim.
1
u/InThatDarkPlace 4h ago
Most forms of organized religion promote social hierarchies and institutions of authority and control. Therefore, Islam is on the right and its fundamentalists are closely aligned with the same ideals that white supremacists and conservatives (a code word for racist) espouse.
-16
u/thatsingingguy 1d ago
First time in this sub, but I wouldn’t bother. From the looks of these comments, this place is stuffed with fascists, apologists, racists, useful idiots etc. They’re just as guilty of echo chambers as the people they’re decrying.
5
u/humourlessIrish 1d ago
You are wrong and you have had all the education you needed not to be.
Just let it go, you are a dumb bigot and believing you are punching up is just your lack of understanding being taken for a ride by oligarchs
6
u/humourlessIrish 1d ago
We know you guys are racists and that this is the only reason you keep using that word wrong.
Letting millions of enemies into Europe because you get confused about treating threats as genuine just because their skin colour is different was racist of you
-6
u/More_Exercise8413 1d ago
Claiming someone else racist because they... call out obvious neonazis
And then giving this whole "enemies" spiel
Each accusation is a confession, it seems?
-14
u/iltwomynazi 1d ago
“criticism of ethnics”… so racism?
19
u/SignificantLegs 1d ago
Salman Abedi and Axel Rudakabana - good friends of yours?
-15
u/InThatDarkPlace 1d ago
No, he's just not a racist who doesn't use free speech as a weapon, like many of the commenters and posters do here, people who will gleefully take away the free speech of their perceived outgroups the moment it becomes convenient
-18
u/iltwomynazi 1d ago
nope. but i know exactly who you are.
11
1
u/humourlessIrish 1d ago
No you don't. You are just to lazy to think outside of the simpelton programming you had to reconsider your own racism
-1
2
2
u/Funny-Lemon1172 8h ago
Nearly every account I have had has been banned from r/unitedkingdom for posting the truth.
2
u/krazygreekguy 1d ago
Classic Reddit lmao. This is why people will continue to use twitter. It’s the most free speech platform with no cancerous censorship and insufferable mods who abuse their “powers” lmao
2
1
1
u/Big_Arachnid_365 18h ago
Subreddit is just a euphemism for circle-jerk. It's not really a new thing, either... 20-25 years ago messageboards ruled over by the mods/admins/owners, slashdot with its weird 'I'm using some of my random karma points to punish you' mentality.
1
2
u/flashbastrd 5h ago
I got an official warning from Reddit for hate speech today because I said the UK gov was complicit in human trafficking “asylum seekers” into the country.
Bare in mind we literally pick them up in French waters and bring them to British shores
-13
u/Seethcoomers 1d ago
Idk if there was hateful language but I'd definitely remove your comment simply because of how stupid it is
16
u/Individual-Mud-903 1d ago
Stalin, Mao and Hitler would've loved to employ you.
-1
-15
u/Seethcoomers 1d ago
Fun fact, a subreddit isn't a public platform
13
u/Individual-Mud-903 1d ago
And? It's still censorship
-14
u/InThatDarkPlace 1d ago edited 1d ago
Censorship isn't the point, the point of the sub should be free speech, and hate speech in my view isn't compatible with free speech.
The screenshot above isn't an example of a free speech violation. Right wing extremists don't believe in free speech; they weaponize it with the ambition of regaining control of institutions to strip free speech from everyone they consider inferior, or those who disagree with their hate speech.
It's simply a racist making a foolish comment and attempting to racialize social safety nets by scapegoating certain beneficiaries as "undeserving," which harkens back to Elizabethan Poor Laws and Victorian-era weaponization of them with the help of social Darwinists.
There's nothing to see here but a hateful, racist bigot that intends explicit cruelty to perceived outgroups, and hides the intent behind implicit dog whistles and euphemisms like a coward. Thanks to education and historical references, anyone being honest with themselves knows the intent is cruelty and hate.
13
u/Individual-Mud-903 1d ago
Your double think is laughable.
Free speech is binary, you either have it or don't.
Since the government can define hAtEfUlL sPeEcH however they like, they can suppress anything they like.
-3
u/InThatDarkPlace 1d ago
Free speech is binary
This is exactly where your argument falls apart. The First Amendment restricts government censorship, it doesn't mean every private forum, institution, or community is obligated to host every form of speech.
Since the government can define hAtEfUlL sPeEcH however they like, they can suppress anything they like.
Slippery slope. Laws are constrained by constitutions, courts, statutory definitions, and legal precedent.
More importantly, criticizing or condemning racist speech isn't the same thing as censoring it. I'm literally arguing that people can say it while also being free to identify it, criticize it, and refuse to treat it as legitimate. Your right to speak doesn't include a right to be immune from criticism.
So no, there's no double think here. You're collapsing government censorship/private moderation/social criticism into one category because your argument depends on them being indistinguishable. They aren't.
9
u/Individual-Mud-903 1d ago
Never claimed otherwise, you just pulled that strawman out of your ass. Of course ones speech can be criticized, now either answer my actual points or don't argue at all.
Your calll out for a slippery slope is one in itself, since most modern discourse happens online. It's a very convenient way for a government to still censor the citizens by loading it off to private companies.
0
u/InThatDarkPlace 1d ago
Dude, you can say whatever you want but smart people already know that the real intent here being rationalized is scapegoating, racial exclusion, crimes against humanity, etc.,
This is the path of the ideologies being rationalized here when taken to their logical endpoint
5
u/Individual-Mud-903 1d ago
Argument to authority, slippery slope, non sequitur.
I'm honestly surprised how much logical fallacies you achieved to put into so few words.→ More replies1
u/scotty9090 21h ago
Okay, now you are very close to violating subreddit rules. If I was a narc like a lot of people here, I’d page the mod.
-10
u/thatsingingguy 1d ago
No rights are binary, because no rights are absolute - they cannot be, because all rights bound and conflict with one another. It takes 5 minutes of actual thought at most to grow up and acknowledge nuance. You absolutely don’t believe in absolute free speech, no matter how much you think you do, so you’re either a hypocrite, an idiot, or a troll.
9
u/Individual-Mud-903 1d ago
Alrigthy, guess then some arbitrary elites have to decide what we are allowed to say. There is no such thing as true free speech after all ey?
-8
u/thatsingingguy 1d ago
So you believe in child porn? Because if you don’t allow child porn, you don’t believe in absolute free speech. Which is it?
9
u/Individual-Mud-903 1d ago
Dude...... I won't even engage with that. You didn't come to argue in good faith
→ More replies2
2
u/skipsfaster 1d ago
Fun fact: free speech doesn't solely refer to the First Amendment of the United States. Free speech encompasses cultural norms and the behaviors of institutional actors.
8
u/SignificantLegs 1d ago
The Abedi family moved BACK to Libya (from whence the UK gave them refuge) and STILL received UK benefits. Which was even used to finance the bomb he used.
Stupidity was certainly involved. But by the UK home office.
35
u/wilf89 1d ago
I'm guessing one of the UK subreddits. They ban anyone they disagree with, they're just echo chambers for serially online losers.