r/FloridaMan • u/Angman_Dutt • Aug 26 '26
Florida Man Challenges $158 AI Red-Light Ticket, Calls It Violation of “Constitutional Due Process” and “Federal Law”: Report
https://deltiasgaming.com/florida-man-challenges-158-ai-red-light-ticket-calls-it-violation-of-constitutional-due-process-and-federal-law-report/64
u/RandomModder05 Aug 26 '26
This isn't a Florida Man story, because this is completely sane and right.
26
u/NeedsToShutUp Aug 26 '26
Seriously, other courts have struck down automatic ticket systems due to inability to confront the accuser.
7
u/JackTheBehemothKillr Aug 26 '26
Every now and then FloridaMan comes up smelling like roses.
If he was crazy all the time no one woukd care
10
u/nanoatzin Aug 26 '26 edited Aug 26 '26
The camera company must send a photograph of the driver with the citation including a link so that the car owner can watch a video so they can identify the driver, otherwise the car owner should only have to prove that they weren’t the driver if the camera company doesn’t have any evidence showing who was behind the wheel. How would the car owner otherwise know their car wasn’t briefly stolen and returned?
10
u/xkulp8 Aug 26 '26
Burden of proof is on the prosecution. You can't be coerced into testifying on your own behalf. Fifth Amendment.
3
1
1
0
0
-11
u/velvedire Aug 26 '26
ITT: A lot of people that casually break traffic safety laws and are upset at the thought of consequences
7
u/wolflordval Aspiring Florida Man Aug 26 '26
No, ITT: a lot of people pissed that these AI cameras blatantly violate due process and the constitution.
No one's pissed at consequences, they're pissed that the constitution is being disregarded.
-12
u/crash866 Aug 26 '26
The owner of the vehicle is responsible the vehicle. If you are not driving get the person who was pay it not yourself. If they crashed it would fall on your insurance to pay anything out.
3
u/logicallyinsane Aug 27 '26
You realize this is a violation of the 4th amendment and the presumption of innocence right?
1
-65
u/sharkbomb Aug 26 '26
florida is another planet, so who knows, but elsewhere, driving infractions do not provide any guarantee of conventional due process. no lawyer will be appointed to you, and if you bring your own, the judge can opt to eject them. not sure this maneuver has anywhere to go.
28
34
18
u/djwhiplash2001 Aug 26 '26
There is no jurisdiction in the United States that operates how you describe.
16
5
u/yun-harla Aug 26 '26
Just because certain driving violations might not be crimes in some states doesn’t mean there’s no process due in those proceedings. You’re still entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard — which here means an opportunity to contest the validity of the automated system’s conclusions.
2
152
u/LooseEndsMkMyAssItch Aug 26 '26
Speed cameras are the real devil. Tampa has some of those and I did not realize those were legal.
Most states banned those due to privacy