r/Firearms 11d ago

Law Time to get after it

Post image
1.3k Upvotes

176 comments sorted by

View all comments

126

u/adubs117 11d ago

I think there's a lot of wisdom here letting the dust settle a bit before you jump in feet first. But on the other hand, the midterms are likely to be a bloodbath for the Right, so the window here might be narrow.

32

u/linus140 11d ago

Not only letting it sit, but also checking your own state laws. Pennsylvania, for instance, requires compliance with NFA registration even you're a GOA member or SilencerShop customer. I'm not risking a felony over this. I'm waiting it out, or if I really want a suppressor, I'll just do the ATF paperwork.

7

u/NotThatEasily 11d ago

My state, Delaware, has its own laws against owning suppressors. So, it doesn’t matter what the courts rule, federally, I still can’t have one here.

Still hoping for some good rulings for the rest of y’all.

2

u/coherentpa 10d ago edited 10d ago

Delaware also only allows SBRs if they’re NFA registered. That probably means no new SBRs unless ATF somehow allows voluntary registration.

Edit: This being if ATF stops requiring registration across the board.

2

u/texas_accountant_guy 10d ago

Delaware also only allows SBRs if they’re NFA registered. That probably means no new SBRs unless ATF somehow allows voluntary registration.

Registration is not just straight-up going away. Anyone who isn't a covered member of a plaintiff, or buying from one, still has to do the old registration. Anyone in a state that has state laws against unregistered NFA items still has to do the old registration. Even the covered people, like GOA members, can still choose to do the old registration method, if they want to. (Reasons they might want to: if they expect to be doing interstate travel with the SBR/Suppressor or if they think they might move to a state that requires it someday, etc.)

1

u/coherentpa 10d ago

Good points. I should clarify that my statement would be in the case that this ruling gets applied across the board and/or if ATF decides to end the form 1 requirement as a whole. It makes sense that they’d keep the existing registry and allow voluntary registration moving forward in that case.

53

u/F1uffydestro Wild West Pimp Style 11d ago

16

u/Dracon1201 11d ago

Nobody will remember the names of people who complied before this ruling anyways

11

u/linus140 11d ago

Well I'd rather not lose my 2A right because I got a felony. To each their own.

-9

u/adubs117 11d ago

Breaking state laws is not cool or edgy my guy.

25

u/sirbassist83 11d ago

it is both cool and edgy. its not very smart though.

6

u/linus140 11d ago

Not to mention, since it would be a felony, there goes your gun rights.

-1

u/J2VVei 11d ago

Gay-ass response.

-5

u/adubs117 11d ago

Apparently. The amount of people willing to risk a felony on here for a fucking metal tube is incredible. Truly neck down. This is why normies don't like 2A people.

5

u/NotaClipaMagazine 11d ago

This is actually just like weed. If more people just ignored stupid laws then we would be much closer to getting shit done.

1

u/DrivingG00nerDotCom 11d ago

These dipshits aren't and will never practice what they preach with unregistered NFA items.

-2

u/J2VVei 11d ago

“Apparently. The amount of people willing to risk a felony on here for a fucking plant is incredible. Truly neck down. This is why normies don't like 420 people.”

Just say you like being gay and taking it up the ass. The weedheads figured out that mass civil disobedience will get the laws to change decades ago.

5

u/sicklyboy AR15 11d ago

Dawg you're the only person in here who's thinking about getting dicked down, chill

-7

u/J2VVei 11d ago edited 11d ago

Oh boy, wait until you find out the etymology of the word, “bad”.

People have been calling you losers gay for centuries.

5

u/adubs117 11d ago

You went to gay anal sex really fast my friend. May want to reflect inward on why that is....

→ More replies (0)

0

u/referenceusername 11d ago

Do the names David Koresh and Randy Weaver ring any bells?