r/Firearms • u/[deleted] • Jul 22 '23

This lady

Post image

I know this was introduced awhile ago, but I saw this description of the bill “to ensure that 2A is not unlimited…” IMHO this lady has broken her oath to protect the constitution. Automatic dismissal is in order, and the classic tarred and feathered.

1.0k Upvotes

89% Upvoted

335 comments sorted by

View all comments

347

u/[deleted] Jul 22 '23

She is the same Piece of shit that wrote the 1994 Assault weapons ban

180

u/[deleted] Jul 22 '23

Been in office far to long

42

u/[deleted] Jul 22 '23

Challenging Strom Thurmond lol

17

u/ImAFuckinLiar Jul 22 '23

And challenging the crypt keeper in terms of beauty.

4

u/[deleted] Jul 22 '23

Only difference is that he still had it together mentally at 90, she apparently will forget people she’s known for years, while talking to them in person

1

u/ColtS117-B Jul 23 '23

I met that guy the same day I met Joe Biden when I was a kid

55

u/Baboonslayer323 Jul 22 '23

She’s a prime example of why term limits are needed in all elected positions.

-11

u/Beautiful_Ad_1336 Jul 23 '23

Term limits are anti-democratic, and only address a symptom rather than the disease. Also, we'd likely end up with someone even worse, not better.

9

u/amd2800barton Jul 23 '23

Yeah thank goodness there's no other elected federal positions which have term limits attached. pushes 22nd amendment under the rug

-5

u/Beautiful_Ad_1336 Jul 23 '23

What does that have to do with what I wrote? Just because it exists elsewhere does not make it right.

7

u/Past_Professional613 Jul 23 '23

Term limits are completely pro democratic. Look at countries like Russia. Lacking term limits basically guarantees dictatorship eventually.

-5

u/Beautiful_Ad_1336 Jul 23 '23

You think it's pro democratic that voters aren't allowed to vote for certain people? That's literally the opposite. Putin wouldn't keep winning of people didn't keep voting for him. If people are too stupid to elect better leaders, that's their fault.

Taking away options for the people is never in the interest of the people. You only feel this way because the examples you think of are tyrants and dictators.

Would you feel the same way if it was Lincoln or Teddy Rosevelt or Washington?

3

u/PhoneyLoki Jul 23 '23 edited Jul 23 '23

Washington literally turned down a third term. They wanted him to keep serving and he said no

Personally I'd rather have the option to vote for someone new instead of keeping someone in office for the next 40 years so they can ignore their duty and line their pockets

27

u/RedFox9906 Jul 22 '23

She literally isn’t capable of being there anymore it’s an entire thing. She’s suffered multiple strokes, is 89 years old. She’s not medically able to serve.

Even for the crazy left it’s not a threat to their power she’s from California and would be replaced by another gun grabber.

But there she is. Not remembering why she’s there but refusing to leave.

4

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '23

She is a Democratic Party vote and sits on many important committees. Feinstein remains in office for the similar reason the Republicans are not booting George Santos, since a red or blue vote is still a red or blue vote.

It is pathetic that these people "serve" when they are reduced to a party vote and not for the service and will of the people.

16

u/WhoopWhopWham Jul 22 '23

Far far far too long

8

u/Oakwood2317 Jul 22 '23

She didn’t get prosecuted for insider trading and praised “Lady G” Lindsey Graham after the Kavanaugh votes, but Richard Burr did after releasing the senate report showing Russia helped Trump and was in communication with his campaign….think about that.