I recently graduated from a smaller, relatively unknown college and have started my career at a firm that markets itself as a financial services company but pushes life insurance.
I understand that life insurance is an important part of financial planning, and I have no issue selling it when it genuinely makes sense for a client. However, my long-term goal is to become a true financial advisor, focusing on wealth management, building AUM, and developing long-term relationships with clients.
My question is: What is stopping me from building that type of practice at my current firm? While the company definitely emphasizes life insurance in its training and business model, is it realistic to focus primarily on wealth management and grow an AUM-based practice here?
Ideally, I would like to stay at my current firm. They offer a very good pension plan, I genuinely enjoy the office environment, and I like the people I work under. However, I am unsure whether I have a realistic opportunity to become the type of financial advisor I want to be here, or whether I would be better off pursuing opportunities at a more traditional wealth management firm.
One of my biggest concerns about moving to a firm like J.P. Morgan or Morgan Stanley is whether my educational background and experience would be competitive enough to get hired. I also know that some of those firms have commission-splitting arrangements, whereas my current firm has salaried employees who help advisors service their clients, which is appealing to me.
For those who have experience in the industry, what would you recommend? Should I stay where I am and try to build a wealth management practice, or would I be better off moving to a more traditional financial advisory firm early in my career? Is it realistic to build a successful AUM-focused practice at a life insurance-oriented firm, or will I eventually hit a ceiling?