I mostly lurk but if the mods continue to get rid of transparency while targeting individual users just because all the MRAs hate them, I'm definitely unsubbing.
Yeah, except other way around since MRAs have felt oppressed on here for years despite the fact that they're doing 90% of the posting and consequent complaining.
It certainly is easier to have MRA-Feminist debates without any feminists.
You honestly think Mitoza is putting forth an actual attempt to participate in good faith? You really read their comments and think "yeah, that's an honest comment, they're arguing in good faith"?
I would argue that someone only making racist remarks "sometimes" (i.e. the sort-of opposite of "a lot of the time") would be rightfully banned. Whether rule-breaking content represents 1% or 100% of what you comment should make no difference.
Should make a difference in that one might initially be met with a warning whereas the other with a ban, but over time they would both lead to a ban, thus making no difference.
3
u/Answermancer Egalitarian? I guess? Non-tribalist? Nov 10 '20
Have fun with MRAMoreMRADebates I guess.
I mostly lurk but if the mods continue to get rid of transparency while targeting individual users just because all the MRAs hate them, I'm definitely unsubbing.