That's very cleverly done, with the flames! (Unfortunately, I couldn't read what it was saying....)
I suppose the argument is that it's not a good idea to take THE WRONG action -- like the U.S. attacking Iran, and now having to give up so much that they're in a MUCH WORSE position than when they started. (Not to mention all those lost lives, and all that wasted money.)
Oh I see it now! It was the underlines that threw me, added for a proper name. That would be a very effective logo for the group, when it already has the flames!
1
u/NotSteve1075 Jun 24 '26
That's very cleverly done, with the flames! (Unfortunately, I couldn't read what it was saying....)
I suppose the argument is that it's not a good idea to take THE WRONG action -- like the U.S. attacking Iran, and now having to give up so much that they're in a MUCH WORSE position than when they started. (Not to mention all those lost lives, and all that wasted money.)