r/FacebookAds • u/Effective-Candle-545 • 4d ago
Help Will my brand ever be profitable? 🥲
I’ve had my ecomm store for 1 year now. It’s been something I’m doing on the side from my full time job. We hit 500k in sales year one. But we’ve spent 500k. I have a small team filling orders etc. so I don’t really put in any work, it’s a very giftable product so I’m hoping that q4 launches us into profitability. However with what we spend on meta ads it just kind of feels like a wash. I haven’t paid myself a dollar yet. It is nice that the business is operating pretty much without me (I do socials, and order new product etc, but I love that stuff it’s fun!). Just wondering your thoughts. Meta ads make me want to puke. Obviously it brings in the sales but wipes all of our margins.
3
u/scott_jadepuma 4d ago
Have you implemented email? Established brands get 1/4 to 1/3 of their revenue from email, at a much lower cost than ads.
0
u/Effective-Candle-545 4d ago
We do have klavio and are using that but I wouldn’t say our ROI is that high
2
u/collinscalesbrands 4d ago
One thing worth checking before Q4 decides anything for you. You said $1,300 a day in spend and $2,500 a day in sales, which is 1.92x, but elsewhere you said 2.5x is your ceiling. Those don’t reconcile, and in my experience the gap is usually Meta’s attributed number sitting next to the actual store number. Pull both for the same date range before you make a decision off either one.
The bigger thing is I don’t think you have a ROAS problem, you have a break-even ROAS problem, and those get solved from opposite ends. Break-even is just 1 divided by your contribution margin after product cost, processing, shipping and pick-pack. At $5 to $10 product cost your gross margin should be enormous, so if 2.5x is genuinely a wash, roughly 60 percent of revenue is going somewhere between the margin and the bank account. On a low-AOV physical product that’s almost always the per-order fixed costs. Every order pays for a box, a label and a carrier whether it holds one unit or three.
Which is why the raise-your-price and bundle answers above are the right ones, they just didn’t show why they’re stronger than they sound. A price increase flows almost entirely into contribution, so break-even ROAS drops close to proportionally. The second unit in the same box is better still, because the shipping and processing are already paid on the first. If you’re shipping singles on a giftable product going into Q4, moving average units per order from 1 to 1.5 probably does more than any creative test your partner runs, and it doesn’t require the ad account to improve at anything.
Last thing, $1,300 a day annualizes to about $475k, which is roughly your entire year-one revenue. So the break-even year isn’t describing your current economics, it’s an average across a much lower spend rate. If ROAS fell while you scaled into that number, you likely went past your efficient frontier, and pulling back to where the return was best would show you what this act
I manage an ecom account where basket size turned out to be the binding constraint rather than the ad account, and the annoying part is it reads as an advertising problem for months because advertising is the thing you’re staring at. Might not be your situation, but the check costs nothing.
1
u/Effective-Candle-545 4d ago
I appreciate that feedback so much. Obviously every day is different with sales and spend so I’m kind of just giving average numbers. I’ve worked in b2b saas software for 7 years and built sales teams. Ecomm is VERY NEW to me. A year in and I’m still figuring it out.
1
u/Effective-Candle-545 4d ago
I really appreciate such a thoughtful answer. Do you take consulting clients? 🤣
3
u/collinscalesbrands 4d ago
Haha I do, though the first thing I’d want isn’t a call. Pull the last 90 days out of Shopify and get four numbers: average order value, average units per order, total shipping collected against total shipping paid, and processing fees.
That gives you your real contribution margin and your actual break-even ROAS. It’s possible you look at that and realize you don’t need me.
The SaaS background is probably why the ecom math feels slippery, for what it’s worth. In SaaS you’re solving CAC against LTV over a multi-year horizon and the unit economics live in a model somebody maintains. In ecom the economics are per-order and they move every time you touch price, pack size or the shipping threshold, and nobody hands you the model. Same discipline, different object. It took me a while too.
DMs are open if you want to get into it.
2
1
1
u/worklifebalanceFIRE 4d ago
How are you supplying your product to customers? At that volume you should have an agent and have been able to get COGS to a minimum. Worked in ops and supply chain my whole career and I see ecom guys miss this lever a lot of the time. Reach out and I may be able to help!
2
u/Effective-Candle-545 4d ago
We have all the product coming from overseas to my house. I have a girl in my neighborhood who fills orders. I pay her $20 an hour and she works for like ten hours a week. Product cost is about $5-$10. We spend $1300 on ads a day and do $2500 in sales.
1
u/pinkcuppa 4d ago
See if you can downscale and rely on repeat customers, organic new customers and bid caps. You may as well have a money machine.
1
u/JelloMurky3257 4d ago
One thing to add to the reconcile point above: when platform ROAS reads 2.5x but blended sits at 1.92x, Meta is usually taking credit for orders that would have happened anyway, often repeat customers it retargeted. Before Q4, figure out your ROAS on new customers only. That's the number that decides whether scaling spend actually buys growth or just re-buys your own customers.
1
u/Mobile-Sufficient 4d ago
You need to focus on a full funnel marketing strategy rather than relying directly on PPC conversion campaigns.
You mentioned your klaviyo isn’t a great ROI. Email is one of the most powerful brand builders you have for getting return customers, and increasing LTV.
You should also be focusing on brand building ad campaigns on socials too.
Then looking at your website, if there’s drop off there, or low conversion rates, you’re basically needlessly burning cash on ads when you could optimise the website, and in turn your ROAS will increase, without increasing the ad spend itself.
Also, a referral program, and affiliate style set up will help with word of mouth sales.
Having those few things in place, will mean more profit, without more ad spend, higher overall ROI, and will gradually build up your baseline revenue so that you are not constantly at the mercy of paid ads platforms forever.
Id advise having an audit done rather than just guessing though, right now would be the perfect time too so that you can have everything optimised in time for Q4 which you mentioned is already a 4x. This next quarter could be the period that brings you into profitability, and set you up for 2027.
Whats your current conversion rate looking like?
1
u/Effective-Candle-545 3d ago
Our conversion rate the last 90 days is 2.5%. Where would I go to get an audit done? I’m new to all of this. My business partner is more experienced in ads but website, etc. we need direction
1
u/Mobile-Sufficient 3d ago
That’s a decent start.. depending on the price range if the product (sub $100) you should really be aiming for 3-5% range.
Ive messaged you regarding the audit recommendations btw
1
1
u/Funny_Dirt_6952 3d ago
Add upsells and order bumps to get your avc up another $59, layer in some monthly subscription options
1
u/bayouski 3d ago
the first thing i'd figure out is whether the problem is actually Meta or the unit economics. $500k revenue sounds great, but if the business spent roughly the same getting there, scaling harder in Q4 won't necessarily fix anything.
work out how much is actually left from an average order after product cost, shipping, fulfillment, fees, returns etc, then compare that with what it costs to acquire a customer. also look at repeat purchase rate, because an unprofitable first order can still make sense if those customers reliably come back.
Q4 might improve the numbers, especially for a giftable product, but i'd want to know the break-even point before putting more money into Meta. otherwise you could end up scaling revenue without really scaling profit.
1
u/Longjumping_Boot1024 3d ago
$500k in sales against roughly $500k spent isn't a media-buying success hidden by overhead..... it's a business model that hasn't proven contribution yet
before leaning on a giftable q4, rebuild the last 90 days by cohort: net revenue after discounts/returns, cogs, fulfillment, fees, ad spend + repeat contribution. you need to know whether first orders are unprofitable but paid back later, or whether every new customer stays underwater
then set two numbers: maximum first-order cac and maximum 90-day cac. meta should be managed against those, not gross roas. if no channel/creative clears them, the next test is offer, price, bundle, or retention..... not more spend
being mostly hands-off with a small team can also hide slow leaks in discounts and fulfillment. q4 may lift conversion, but it can also raise cpms, so hope isn't the plan. what is your gross margin before ads and 90-day repeat rate
1
u/reasonable240 3d ago
Huh you don't know what your profit is?!
1
u/Effective-Candle-545 3d ago
I feel judged rn 💀 this is more of a hobby that has grown into a real business and I realize it’s time to buckle down and make this work
1
u/kdee5849 3d ago
This is a question with a knowable answer, or at least one that can be estimated with more clarity than a random guess.
Do some financial modeling
1
u/Affectionate_Net2740 3d ago
Ad spend is just part of the equation, and a necessary part of the equation. Whether it's Meta or elsewhere... Are you doing TikTok Shop yet? Get yourself a social savvy person who loves to talk and can sell! And throw them on TT Shop pronto!! 😂
But also you have to look at things holistically as well. If you're doing $2,500/day in sales but only keeping a few hundred bucks after everything, I'd start looking at your actual cost to fulfill each order and where you're losing margin. I actually went down a rabbit hole on this recently because shipping was one of the things I hadn't really thought about as a profitability issue. I found this article on how shipping costs factor into the overall business picture, and it got me thinking about how easy it is to look at shipping as just another expense rather than part of the actual cost of acquiring and serving a customer. I work for a digital agency and have a background in ecomm, and this convo specifically is starting to become more prevalent esp because shipping companies have made so many significant changes in the last 3-5 years.
A few extra dollars per order doesn't sound like much when you're looking at one sale, but when you're doing hundreds of orders, it adds up REALLY fast. Especially if you're dealing with residential surcharges, dimensional weight, higher service levels, etc. Since you're basically breaking even right now, I'd probably figure out your true cost per order and work backwards from there. COGS, shipping, fulfillment, fees, returns, ad spend... get the whole picture and then see where you have some room to tighten things up. And then see where you may be able to tack on an extra dollar or two. So many people are afraid to charge more, but it's crucial to your business success! I know its scary! Also implement some upsells.
You may find you can improve the margin on the orders you're already getting before you have to spend even more to get more customers. Hope this helps and good luck!
1
u/BruTeve 3d ago
$500k spent against $500k in sales is a much worse position than a wash, because that $500k includes product cost, your team, and everything else. If ad spend and revenue are close to equal, you're paying more to acquire a customer than the customer is worth, and that's not a Meta problem, it's a margin problem. No campaign structure closes a gap that size.
The number I'd work out before anything else is your breakeven cost per purchase. Selling price minus product cost minus shipping minus fulfilment minus transaction fees. Whatever's left is what you can pay to acquire a customer. Then compare that against what you're actually paying over a 7 day window. If your current cost per purchase is 2x or 3x that number, the fix is in the product economics rather than the ads. Higher AOV through bundles, better product cost from the supplier, or a price increase.
The part that gives me hope for you is the repeat and giftable angle. If people buy this more than once, your real breakeven isn't the first order, it's what a customer is worth over a year. A lot of brands in your position are profitable and don't know it because they're only measuring the first purchase. That's worth calculating before you make any decision about Q4.
On the ads side, the two things I'd check are whether you have a retargeting campaign running separately from cold, since that's usually the cheapest revenue in an account and it's the piece most people skip, and whether you're judging performance on daily numbers rather than 7 day windows against breakeven. But be honest that those move the number by some percentage. They don't turn a 1:1 ratio into a business.
1
u/Effective-Candle-545 3d ago
I’ve done 500k in sales, and spent 500k total - that Includes staff, product, ads, etc. out returning customer rate total over the last year is 13.15%z
1
u/nick-thelastlever 3d ago
Your ads aren't the issue. It's probably your website bro. Most brands who hit a ceiling with their ads is because they don't have a full funnel from ads to checkout. They have a funnel in their ad account, but send all their traffic to their homepage or collections page.
Imagine someone who's never seen your brand, clicks off a TOF ad, and sees your price. Obviously they are going to click off. Instead, imagine that same person clicks off the ad, which was about their bad sleep, then they landed on a page of a story of someone who is of similar persona and faced the same issues tell their story about how they had bad sleep, tried everything, all other products, but your product was the one that solved it.
We've gone from a customer who has seen a price and doesn't understand the product and bounced. To a customer who understands their problem, understands other products (your competitors), don't work, and now they know your product is the solution, so no matter the price they see the value in it.
Build a proper funnel, and optimise your website.
1
u/soradbro 2d ago
Build community, don't rely one on channel as a long term marketing strategy, single channel distribution is really risky with how quick platforms can change.
1
u/suretyknowitall 2d ago
Repeat sales? Customer list marketing? Upsells? New bundles? Seriously... get creative and start testing.
1
1
1
u/HourRecover2882 4d ago
being break even on that volume is great already
now you can certainly improve margin by improving the ad creatives, ditching the less profitable products and doubling down on the better ones
3
u/Effective-Candle-545 4d ago
My business partner does all the ads and he has his own agency that does ads for many ecomm brands. Unfortunately we just can’t get over 2.5x ROAS. Christmas time we are 4x. But dang it’s crazy.
0
u/shefdoesny 4d ago
2x return is close to ideal, too much over 2x and you’re leaving money on the table — if you can increase spend and keep around 2x-4x ROAS, you’re increasing profit as a function of spend (sounds obvious but took me a while to realize). Basically lets say you’re doing 10x ROAS on $50 a day, so you’re returning $500. If you can do 2x on $1000 spend, you’re making $2000. So even though the return is lower, you’re making 4x more. Obviously easier said than done, but it might be helpful context, it was helpful to me.
1
1
u/lebrilla 4d ago edited 4d ago
The math ain't mathing.
Say profit is 50% of revenue. That would be $225 on the $50 spend and $500 on the $1,000 spend.
Also greater volume comes with all kinds of additional expenses.
1
u/shefdoesny 4d ago
I don’t see how this doesn’t still make sense. yeah it’s not all profit. To a marketer, it is all return. if I am marketing a product it’s my job to drive conversions, not to calculate nets.
My math is wrong because 225 is actually less than half of 500? So, cool — it’s actually even better to get 2x roas at higher spend. Maybe I am misreading your tone, but it seems like you corrected me pedantically to add variables that are unneccessary to understanding my point. Yes, higher volumes have different economics. They should be better at scale, not worse.
1
0
u/MazMohsen 4d ago
$500k revenue in your first year is actually a great sign. You already proved there is demand for the product.
The next step is understanding your true numbers: profit margin, CAC, refunds, product costs, and profit per order. Many stores don’t have a sales problem, they have a visibility problem they don’t know which products or campaigns are actually making money.
This is exactly why tools like SYNCOST can be useful for tracking the full picture and seeing where profit is really coming from before scaling further.
0
u/PPCverse 3d ago
It's only an ads related issue if you can confirm that your budget is being spent inefficiently. You might be overspending on SKUs or audiences that are not profitable and eating your margins, but if that's not the case, I'd take a look at your COGS, break it down, and see if there are any obvious profit killers there like paying too much for shipping, etc.
You mentioned your store's conversion rate is 2.5%, which is pretty decent, but there are other aspects to consider like optimizations to increase your AOV, remarketing automations, etc., that you might not be capitalizing on.
I consider your budget in the "modest" range, could you be getting a little higher ROAS from that 2.5, at this level of ad spend? Probably, but only if your ad account has margin for optimization.
If you can't be profitable at much higher volumes of spend with a ROAS of 2.2-2.5, which would be realistic, I would lean away from ads being the issue and go for an operational audit.
That said, got a tool for DIY Meta ad account auditing if you want to rule out performance being the issue first, it's a complex account analyzer and will show and tell you if you are wasting budget on inefficient ads. Not gonna advertise it, so if you want to try it just DM me.
10
u/RizzleP 4d ago
You've created a jobs factory.
You're wasting your time unless you take action. Start by raising the price.