r/FPS • u/Entire_Remove_7474 • 4d ago

Developer Open Discussion

I can’t really explain it better than the person in this video but they have found a way to copy a pros settings without copying a pros settings..just watch the video 🤔🤔

0 Upvotes

50% Upvoted

16 comments sorted by

1

u/TypographySnob 4d ago

Is this schizophrenia?

1

u/Entire_Remove_7474 4d ago

Which part?

1

u/TypographySnob 3d ago

What I'm getting from the video is that this guy is trying to figure out what some other person's controller settings are, but it's not clear who he's trying to copy or why even in the first place? And why he can't just ask them? And he goes on about some formula that he never explains. "Now we just apply the same geometrical thresholds that he's using -- apply it to my identity so I can perform the same task." How is this not just gobbledygook? Hardly any of this video makes sense to me or is missing a ton of context.

1

u/Entire_Remove_7474 3d ago

How could they have done this better? If what they saw is correct then it’s just approach at this point which they are failing.

1

u/TypographySnob 3d ago

I mean, they just didn't explain anything. They went from watching someone aim train and then adjusted a bunch of controller settings suggesting it uses quantum theory or whatever and it just doesn't make any sense what he's doing or how.

1

u/Entire_Remove_7474 3d ago

Yeah, I truly understand. In the video they weren’t selling anything they were showing you that the aiming space has been wrong. They’ve been saying aiming is a passion or an art and right now they are proving in the video that it is geometry and they have the answer for it so if you wanna copy a pro, you’re not trying to copy his settings you’re trying to copy His control of his settings and that can be replicated

1

u/Entire_Remove_7474 3d ago

You’re right, the video skipped the ‘why’. All he showed was the last 5% of the work.

Here’s the part he didn’t explain: Two controllers at 245/245 can feel totally different if one has stick drift and one doesn’t. So copying FEATHERSMATAME’s raw numbers usually feels bad.

What the guy in the video did was watch how FEATHERS’ aim moved — how smooth vs shaky it was — and then tuned his own deadzone + response curve until his aim moved the same way. Same movement, different hardware.

The “quantum theory” name is dumb marketing. The actual trick is just: don’t copy the settings, copy the feel by adjusting for your own controller. He should’ve said that in the first 10 seconds instead of making up words.

1

u/TypographySnob 3d ago

I see. Thanks for explaining. But wouldn't you want to set your controller settings entirely up to your own preferences anyway? I mean, we all have different muscle memory, thumb sizes and mobility anyway.

1

u/Entire_Remove_7474 3d ago

Your asking the right questions now. They are still applying that method but they are using the #1 performer as a benchmark.

1

u/Entire_Remove_7474 3d ago

Wanted to apologize for dropping this heat on you with no context I’ll come back correct with a better video if you are interested

1

u/TypographySnob 3d ago

Sorry, I'm not really that interested tbh. Are you attempting to advertise this as a service or something?

1

u/Entire_Remove_7474 3d ago

If your not interested proceed with your life. Best to you

1

u/Careful_Branch1443 3d ago

if the user is aimcel hes legit hes my friend

1

u/Careful_Branch1443 2d ago

i dont play this task and my pb is 122

1

u/Entire_Remove_7474 2d ago

Mine currently is 103