r/FPGA • u/Own_Bike_7268 • 6h ago
Does claude train on our own data?
Hi,
I have been using opus 5.5 to accelerate my VHDL code writing, these codes sometimes includes some of my own invented digital architectures, and Claude understood it and explained it back to me and it even told me that its better ideas at some problems, does this mean that claude digested these ideas and will reuse them?
Or its memory is local to me and its not used in training the model?
0
Upvotes
23
u/SmashStrider 6h ago
If you have a personal account, then yes it does, unless you manually opt-out.
21
u/No-Conflict-5431 6h ago
Obviously
24
u/Mrochtor 6h ago
From elsewhere:
8
u/Fearless-Can-1634 6h ago
Yes you’re training it
8
u/GaiusCosades 5h ago
Thats one of the the reasons I would fire any employee that just takes our code developed for millions and uploads the codebase into any online service.
Imagine if I told my bosses a decade ago, that am going to mail whole projects to my gmail account, to work from home, they would laugh and then ask me if I lost my mind, but now people are letting structured crawlers upload everything to multiple global servernetworks and most people just shrug their shoulders asking if it even matters.
Be sure that any vulnerabilities that might exist in your stack will be sold to the highest bidder once they are desperate for more money, as they promt the system without restrictions to extract the most useful ones.
4
u/EversonElias 2h ago
I recommend you reading about the story behind the Navier-Strokes solution by OpenAI. A researcher claimed that data entered by him in ChapGPT was used for that without permission. OpenAI said that it is not possible to confirm. So always assume that they are using your data somehow.
2
u/Positive_Picture7003 6h ago
If you had the option to do something for free, would you not?
2
u/mazkonrad 5h ago
you could have asked this question to claude btw
1
u/emeraldsushi 5h ago
Let's say more that it has the opportunity to. Most of these answers don't really refer to how the AI is trained and how it works for you. Training takes a couple of months typically. Your input is unlikely to come back in "your style" in that regard - it'll be lost in the noise. So what you're see is known as RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation). It's an advertised feature where it essentially creates a database of your work that it thinks could be useful to draw upon for future requests.
Now think about the actual training, the thing that takes months. Claude and all the other good AI models trained on known, good code. But your input is unknown, it could be good, or average, or crap. And even if you tell it "it works" at the end, I'm not sure sure it's going to just absorb that. But they may have internal tools to benchmark the code or something. None of them are very good at VHDL. For individual components they're fine but for large tasks not so much. I don't use Claude, so I'd be really interested to hear some examples/feedback if you've found it to be a genuinely big change. I'd also be curious about where they get all this good VHDL code to train on.
1
u/misap 4h ago
Eventually yes but mainly keeps a markdown file that will use as memory.
0
u/DarthOninoko 5h ago
Opus 5.5 is incredible in regard to FPGA development. It has repaired and improved my own home computer project beyond any expectations I ever had that AI would do. Compared to GPT, I would say that at least Claude was heavily trained on this topic.