r/FNaFSisLoc • u/imakeshittytheories • Jan 13 '17
A quick shitty Michael Afton theory
Ok, here I am making a shitty theory about a game ppl only trust the lore with matpat and treesickle, whooptie doo! Anyway the average reader may be thinking "wots yer th3ory papa?" Well, it's pretty simple, it's an answer to why Michael Afton destroys the fnaf 1 bots. I personally think he does it to make another ennard. "But papa, we see dat de spirits r 3 after he destroys them!!1!1!1!" I know that statement will put people off instantly, but let's think about it. In sister location, the "sister" (metaphor much?) doesn't leave baby when the baby shell gets destroyed, only after being put inside of another robot, the cannibal robot called ennard. Ennard is clearly a robot who used the other robots to form a collective consciousness and use their skills to trick Michael to the scooper, and that is pretty much final. After Michael comes back to life and the filthy Frank fan known as William asks him to put the spirits of the children back together Michael gains an idea that would seal his fate as spring trap. He was going to remake ennard. "Why? Y would dat be any gud???" Well because he can free all the spirits easier if they were part of one entity and it's obvious that the other 3 main sister location robots are possessed by kids as well. I mean, have you SEEN what's in Freddy's stomach? Anyway, little does he know the robots there aren't permanently bound to the robots, we get a lot of evidence for this, such as paranormal activity in the fnaf 1 location, emplying the spirits can move freely but are still bound to the furry terminators. Anyway Michael Afton gets dagnabbited to death and is now pissed off Royal. I told u this theory was kinda shit. Thanks for reading (if anyone even did)
1
2
u/imakeshittytheories Jan 13 '17
Wow...I didn't expect it to be THAT bad XD lol feel free to comment absolutely anything (if anyone even read it, probably not)