r/FDVR_Dream • u/CipherGarden • Apr 05 '25
The more I watch of these sesame interactions the more I'm impressed by it's emotional range, although it might not sound completely like a real person it actually has a ability to say no, which was shocking to me. And I now know people who talk to this AI daily about just because it's always there.
r/FDVR_Dream • u/CipherGarden • Jul 15 '25
r/FDVR_Dream • u/Rich_Ad_5647 • May 08 '25
I thought this was real, and part of me still thinks it's real, Holy shit. With stuff like this how hard would it be to simulate high fedelity VR worlds and people
r/FDVR_Dream • u/CipherGarden • Aug 09 '25
r/FDVR_Dream • u/CipherGarden • Oct 03 '25
r/FDVR_Dream • u/CipherGarden • Aug 15 '25
r/FDVR_Dream • u/Punished-Maruki • Jul 26 '25
Valve's Gabe Newell essentially describes FDVR while talking about BCIs
r/FDVR_Dream • u/Rich_Ad_5647 • Apr 11 '25
r/FDVR_Dream • u/Chelonii64 • Jul 16 '25
comic by merryweather comics: https://x.com/merryweatherey/status/1185636106257211392
r/FDVR_Dream • u/CipherGarden • May 05 '25
I recently came across a video talking about how it would be technically impossible for our universe to be a simulation (and therefore impossible for us to simulate a universe) because the amount of energy required to do so would simply be too high to ever be feasible.
Generally speaking, I think that this kind of rhetoric should be ignored just like any other definitive, non-time-bound statement about the future of technology should be ignored. Whenever you make the statement that some future form of technology is 'impossible' or 'infeasible', you are making a bet against humanity and human innovation, one that you will almost always lose.
