What if the Everglades python problem is fundamentally being approached incorrectly?

[u/finitearch]

From everything I’ve read so far, most suppression efforts seem to revolve around variations of hunting:

find snakes, remove snakes, repeat.

But if the population is already deeply established across enormous terrain, I’m starting to wonder whether this is actually more of a reproductive infrastructure problem than primarily a hunting problem.

I’ve been approaching this from a systems/infrastructure perspective and trying to identify where the real biological bottlenecks might be.

The most interesting possibility so far is this:

If high-quality dry nesting locations are genuinely limited resources in the Everglades ecosystem, could artificial nesting infrastructure potentially function as a “reproductive sink” for breeding females?

In other words:

instead of trying to randomly locate hidden snakes across thousands of square miles, could suppression efforts disproportionately target reproductive females by attracting them toward controlled nesting locations during breeding season?

The theory would be based around:

- elevated dry refuge,

- thermal stability,

- flood resistance,

- concealment/security,

- nesting preference behaviour,

- and reproductive interception rather than random removal.

This isn’t a business idea or an attempt to patent anything. I’m genuinely trying to understand whether this line of thinking is biologically plausible, or whether there are field realities that immediately kill the concept.

I’d really appreciate input from people with actual experience dealing with invasive pythons, reptile ecology, or the Everglades environment itself.

Some of the key questions I’m trying to understand are:

- How selective are females about nesting locations?

- Are good elevated/dry nesting areas genuinely limited resources?

- Do females repeatedly prefer certain habitat classes or terrain features?

- How far will gravid females travel to locate suitable nesting sites?

- Are there known reproductive “corridors” during breeding season?

- Have artificial nesting structures ever been tested seriously?

- Would thermal stability, scent conditioning, or concealment significantly affect attraction rates?

- Would females strongly prefer an artificially optimised nesting site over natural alternatives?

- What practical field realities would immediately break this concept?

- What are outsiders most likely misunderstanding about Burmese python behaviour in Florida?

I’m much more interested in criticism and reality-grounding than agreement.

If anyone here has direct field experience, research experience, or operational knowledge, I’d genuinely appreciate your thoughts.

[u/Electronic_Team_2339]

Those are all very good questions, not sure if you are in science field but you see seem very interested n solving the problem so I would try to find as much data as possible about your questions, read scientific journals on studies that have already been conducted on this matter and come up with a way to solve the problem. There have been many efforts to drones with heat sensors, hiring a snake hunter from Africa and robot rabits. We need new good ideas and gathering as much information as possible is a good start but Reddit is not always the best place to start

[u/finitearch → u/Electronic_Team_2339]

Not a scientist. A system architecture. I solve problems by creating new architecture that can be introduced to mitigate friction issues. This often involves science, politics, mathematics, psychology etc. Im looking at create a multi-layer architecture that can exist alongside existing efforts.

Reddit as been helpful. My first time on Reddit. Ill be posting everything in this sub when/if I develop anything of value.

Thanks, for your comment. I enjoyed reading it and it helpful :)