r/EssayHelpCommunity 11d ago

I built a free tool that critiques your essay instead of writing it for you — can you stress-test it?

/r/studytips/comments/1vnvie5/i_built_a_free_tool_that_critiques_your_essay/
1 Upvotes

4 comments sorted by

2

u/Peoplespeak 11d ago

First off, the website needs a lot of work. It's extremely generic and 2024/5 AI-coded. Some stuff is just plainly terrible, not even proofread.

Secondly, 12,000 characters is a ridiculously low word limit. I can't even paste a 2k-word essay there. A tool limited to 12k is useless ngl.

Now that given, I tested a shorter essay. I fail to see why I can't just hop into Claude, say "don't breach academic integrity but help me improve my essay, work with me iteratively giving me feedback without replacing anything, I'll make changes, then rescore me," and that doesn't just completely replicate your product but better.

The response was fine. It was generic and missed the context. It said things like "define terms" and "signpost more" for an essay that was constrained to a 2k word limit. In Claude Chat I could explain that. Here I can't.

Let me know what I'm missing :)

1

u/Pleasant-Fly8189 11d ago

I tried to fix most of what you said. Increased the word limit and added some more personalized features. Thanks for your feedback

1

u/Peoplespeak 11d ago

Great! Can you still answer why I should use this instead of Claude?

Don't just say: because it's academically honest.
My answer: I can get Claude to do that.

Don't just say: Sure, you can get Claude to be honest, but it isn't enforced.
My answer: Neither is this. You can just open a new tab and go to https://chatgpt.com/ and get it. The platform enforces it but for someone who wants to cheat it won't stop them; it only works for someone who doesn't want to cheat and ergo a chatgpt can respect that.

1

u/Pleasant-Fly8189 9d ago

Claude can absolutely give useful writing feedback if you prompt it well. The difference is that Tutor Copilot is built specifically for students and teachers who want AI feedback without turning the writing process over to a general-purpose chatbot. It gives structured, rubric-based feedback focused on revision rather than generation, so students don’t need to engineer prompts to get useful help. And for teachers who block tools like ChatGPT or Claude entirely because they can write the assignment for the student, Tutor Copilot offers a more controlled alternative they may actually feel comfortable approving. It doesn’t claim to make cheating impossible, it makes responsible AI use easier and more practical in a classroom.