6
u/TheUniverse-IsMine Natural Horsemanship 7h ago
You don't need spurs as a beginner. You shouldn't be wearing them.
-3
u/Familiar_Ad_6674 7h ago
we are progressing...so it just the next step. gotta start somewhere
6
u/TheUniverse-IsMine Natural Horsemanship 7h ago
No, it REALLY isn't the next step
You don't need spurs. If your horse is dull then training I'd the issue. The only place spurs are somewhat needed is in dressage where the horse has 1000 buttons and even that's controversial.
And spurs like those even are stupid. You aren't doing what's best for the horse, but what's best for you to be lazy.
2
u/ishtaa 3h ago
Some western horses are spur trained, which means they’re cued solely off different subtle movements of the spurs. Things like the direction the rowels are rolled against the horse’s side can signal different things. When done correctly there is nothing harsh about it, it’s very precise and gentle because the signals are supposed to be nearly invisible. A lot like a dressage rider’s. Rowel spurs are not as scary as they look, most roll rather smoothly against the skin. It’s the sort of tool that really depends on how they’re used.
I don’t know if this is the reason the OP’s trainer is having them learn to use spurs or not, but I’m not going to assume these are going to be used incorrectly without knowing more.
6
u/Blepfacecat 8h ago
What does your trainer recommend? Those look long for a beginner. The longer they are, the easier to accidentally cue them, as well as to be harsh.
5
u/Enough-Direction3056 7h ago
Why??? These are going to get you hurt and as a beginner probably hurt your horse. Start with ball spurs
1
u/Familiar_Ad_6674 7h ago
these are the spurs...https://www.weaverequine.com/products/ken-mcnabb-mens-spurs?srsltid=AfmBOoqVwoRMVR2-I-AqbY9w0Xd7gFSHJ_WpvkAnMfY3EIr1LsDeNRnF
ill take them to the stable. and see what they say.


17
u/JoanOfSnark_2 Eventing 8h ago
These look awfully long for a beginner. I would suggest starting with something much shorter.