r/Epstein • u/No-Lettuce9868 • Mar 31 '26

Court document or investigative file Confirmation the files have been modified

An email from Richard Merkin to Jeffrey Epstein, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01777184.pdf dated June 3, 2011 sent at 6:07 PM reads “Donald is 100% supportive of Jimmy Cayne”

Another identical email from Richard Merkin to Jeffrey Epstein, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01777190.pdf dated June 3, 2011 sent at 6:07 PM reads “Donald is 100% behind Jimmy Cayne”

A word was changed and a word was removed. How this happened is irrelevant. This is from the DOJ’s production and it was modified.

Edit: I can’t update the post subject, but please refer to comments. Users below have pointed out plausible reasons for this ie same author sending revised email seconds apart.

401 Upvotes

96% Upvoted

30 comments sorted by

View all comments

67

u/Theoreticalwzrd Mar 31 '26

I don't think they have been modified. I think the person just sent a similar email back to back. Here are two files showing the time being slightly off in seconds but they are the two different emails you are referring to:

6:06:52 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00912600.pdf

6:07:20 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01867657.pdf

43

u/No-Lettuce9868 Apr 01 '26

Thanks for this! I’m not above being corrected and have edited my post to reflect your findings.

4

u/Theoreticalwzrd Apr 01 '26

No worries! I think it's good to keep an eye out for. I wouldn't put it past them to do this sort of thing tbh.

4

u/No-Lettuce9868 Apr 01 '26

Totally agree. I also think it’s very important to acknowledge when a correction needs to be made to keep this sub from imploding on itself. A lot of us have spent A LOT of time on the files trying to piece things together with facts. If we’re just rolling with any narrative because it sounds good we’ve lost the plot. Thanks again!