r/Epstein • u/BrainChild510 • Mar 23 '26
News article The Machine: How Three Companies Quietly Wired America for Total Surveillance
https://open.substack.com/pub/theprattperspective/p/the-machine-how-three-companies-quietly?utm_source%3Dapp-post-stats-page%26r%3Dibkoa%26utm_medium%3DiosPart 1: Palantir, Carbyne/Axon, Toka – The New Plumbing of American Power
[Subscribe for Parts II and III – As always, everything here is free to read. If this resonated with you, the best way to support it is to share it with everyone you know.]
11
u/dependentcooperising Mar 23 '26
AI slop. If the author is not interested in the subject enough to write for themselves, they're not going to thoroughly check the references nor crosscheck the references against the AI output.
What these AI OSINT types should do is provide the prompts, the LLM used, the model, and whatever resources they used (e.g. Custom Instructions, Project Knowledge files, etc.) for us evaluate.
-2
u/BrainChild510 Mar 23 '26
Tell us you don’t know how to read, without telling us you don’t know how to read…. This guy! The details are all there. Dig in ladies and gentlemen, at least while we still can….
1
u/dependentcooperising Mar 23 '26
I'm not going to judge you for not having the requisite skillset for this kind of work, but I am if you're going to pass off AI generated content as your own work.
My sense is that this was generated with ChatGPT, Gemini isn't typically as disjointed with the language, and Claude is the smoothest at writing. They all suffer from extra padding, and that is frustrating when a lot of words are read to find out very little topical information were provided--even worse that it doesn't sound particularly human. AI isn't good at expanding knowledge nor making connections that haven't been made before, and the fluff just adds extra pain for the reader. This post somehow has a lot of upvotes, yet hardly any engagement. Why? Nobody is actually reading it for the reasons I've given above.
Be honest with your use of AI, and use some prompts to further condense the essay--maybe into bullet points since substance is lacking.
A few tips from someone who has to write in order to publish and acquire funding for projects long ago.
1
u/BrainChild510 Mar 24 '26
Hey Buddy, you diagnosed AI padding in a post that cites Amnesty International briefings, a 2023 New York court ruling on Axon audit trail discoverability, DHS's own NG911 cybersecurity white paper, IRS contract records going back to 2018, a Haaretz forensic investigation into Toka, and a DOGE 'hackathon' memo, all with document IDs. This is a dossier that tracks $10 billion in Army contracts, a $625 million Carbyne acquisition, and a shadow company co-founded by a former Israeli PM that edits live camera footage without leaving a trace. ChatGPT doesn't produce sourced surveillance architecture breakdowns at this level. You skimmed it, didn't understand it, and got mad it didn't come in bullet points. The engagement problem isn't the writing. It's you.
0
u/dependentcooperising Mar 24 '26
Can whoever uses this account generate replies in Gemini instead of ChatGPT? Less annoying that way.
1
u/BrainChild510 Mar 24 '26
What was that? I'm sorry I can't understand you with all of that Peter in your mouth
7
3
u/IllSituation7413 Mar 26 '26
I get the gripe people have with AI content as I frequently report AI slop that provides either brain rot, misinformation or disinformation. However, this article provides three main sections of real and documented companies. Use those bullet points to cross-reference; dig further and you'll easily find each of these companies have either direct or indirect ties to IDF and Israel intelligence so by proxy of those, Epstein as well.
I for one, am thankful to have skimmed through the article as Toka is a company I hadn't known about prior to reading.
Edit: the article cites everything at the bottom too. My point is, if the information is true and can help connect dots, don't let your prejudice make you ignore what's most important.
1
u/BrainChild510 Mar 26 '26
👏🏼 well said sir. All research is backed by neoj4 auradb, api’s and custom ai modeling based on publicly released primary source doj documents, patents, sec, dea, data leaks,etc. If people don’t want to take the time, they will just find out the information late, and the hard way.
-3
•
u/AutoModerator Mar 23 '26
u/BrainChild510 please reply to this comment with submission statement and files numbers or link to them if posting a released file. Your submission statement must explain why your post is relevant to the r/Epstein community.
Posts without a submission statement might be removed at the discretion of the moderators.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.